Assessing the economic performance indicators of the Russian far east as a territory of priority development

Occupation: associate professor of far Eastern state agrarian University
Affiliation: Far Eastern State Agrarian University
Address: Russian Federation

Elena Kharchenkova

Occupation: postgraduate student, national research University Higher school of Economics»
Affiliation: National research University «Higher school of Economics»
Address: Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg

Journal name

Obshchestvo i ekonomika

Edition

Issue 8

Pages

105-117

Abstract

The article gives a review of the world practice in the assessment of economic performance for special territories. The authors examine the current state of the Russian Far East as a priority development area and suggest a new approach to the evaluation of economic performance of the territories prioritized as the would-be zones of the expedited socio-economic growth.

Keywords

special economic zone (SEZ), territories of priority development (TPD), Russian Far East, evaluation method

Received

14.10.2018

Publication date

16.10.2018

Number of characters

235

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Simutina N., Kharchenkova E. Assessing the economic performance indicators of the Russian far east as a territory of priority development // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2018. – Issue 8 C. 105-117 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760000820-1-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760000820-1
MLA	Simutina, Natalya, Kharchenkova, Elena "Assessing the economic performance indicators of the Russian far east as a territory of priority development." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 8 (2018):105-117. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760000820-1
APA	Simutina N., Kharchenkova E. (2018). Assessing the economic performance indicators of the Russian far east as a territory of priority development. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (8), pp.105-117 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760000820-1

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 1768

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Praktika ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya territorij: opyt ES i Rossii // Moskva, EC-Tacis, 2001.

2. Chien-Hsun Chen, (1996),"Regional determinants of foreign direct investment in mainland China" // Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 23 Iss: 2 R. 18- 30.

3. Boschma R., Frenken K. The spatial evolution of innovation networks: a proximity perspective // Handbook on Evolutionary Economic Geography. – Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010. P. 120–135.

4. Filatotchey, I., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2009). The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: The effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs // Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 1005- 1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.105 (accessed 18.01.2018).

5. Pfotenhauer, S.M. Architecting complex international science, technology and innovation partnerships(CISTIPs): A study of four global MIT collaborations [Text] / S.M. Pfotenhauer, D. Wood, D. Roos, D. Newman// Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2016. № 104. P. 38-56.

6. Maximilian von Zedtwitz, Managing foreign R&D laboritories in China // R&D Management 34, 4. 2004. R. 439-452

7. L.M. Gokhberg, S.A. Zanchenko, G.A. Kitova, T.E. Kuznetsova. Nauchnaya politika: global'nyj kontekst i rossijskaya praktika // M.: Izd.dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2011.

8. Moutinho, R.F. Absorptive capacity and business model innovation as rapid development strategies for regional growth [Text] / R.F.F. Moutinho // Investigación Económica. 2016. vol. LXXV. № 295. P. 157-202.

9. Cheung K. and Lin P. Spillover Effects of FDI on Innovation in China: Evidence from the Provincial Data // China Economic Review. 2004. No. 15 (1). P. 25-44.

10. Yufei Sun (2002) China’s National Innovation System in Transition // Eurasian Geigraphy and Economics, 43:6. R. 476-492.

11. Porter M. Konkurentnoe preimuschestvo: Kak dostich' vysokogo rezul'tata i obespe- chit' ego ustojchivost' / Per. s angl. // M: Al'pina Biznes Buks. 2005.

12. Minakir P.A., Prokapalo M. Dal'nij Vostok: real'nye strategii i mnimye pro- grammy // Vestnik DVO RAN. 2007. № 5. S. 13-21.

13. Rosstat [Rosstat]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru (accessed 10.03.2018).

14. Razvitie Dal'nego Vostoka Rossii v kontekste buduschego Severo-Vostochnoj Azii [Ehlektronnyj resurs] : monografiya / Korejskij institut mezhdunarodnoj ehkono- micheskij politiki; Institut ehkonomicheskikh issledovanie DVO RAN // Khaba- rovsk: IEhI DVO RAN. 2017.

15. Minakir P.A. Tikhookeanskaya Rossiya: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti ehkonomicheskoj koopera- tsii s Severo-Vostochnoj Aziej // Prostranstvennaya ehkonomika. 2005. № 4. S. 5-20.

16. TOR «Belogorsk» nazvali odnoj iz samykh ehffektivnykh po itogam 2017 goda /Amur.info. 24 yanvarya 2018. http://www.amur.info/news/2018/01/24/134122 (accessed 12.03.2018).

17. Territorii operezhayuschego razvitiya na Dal'nem Vostoke riskuyut povtorit' sud'bu osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon, "Vedomosti" / Schetnaya palata RF. 25 Oktyabrya 2017 g. http://www.ach.gov.ru/press_center/publications-in-mass-media/31749?sphrase_id=7085741 (accessed 02.03.2018).

18. Utverzhdeny Plany perspektivnogo razvitiya TOR «Priamurskaya» i «Belogorsk» /Ministerstvo Rossijskoj Federatsii po Razvitiyu Dal'nego Vostoka. - 20.10.2017 https://minvr.ru/press-center/news/9207 (accessed 24.03.2018).

19. Byulleten' Schetnoj palaty Rossijskoj Federatsii /Schyotnaya palata Rossijskoj Federatsii. - № 12 (240) 2017 god http://www.ach.gov.ru/activities/bulleten/bulletin-of-the-accounting-chamber-12- december-2017.php?sphrase_id=7085846 (accessed 24.03.2018).

20. Rykova I.N. Ehffektivnost' byudzhetnykh raskhodov na realizatsiyu investitsionnoj i ehkonomicheskoj politiki v sub'ektakh Rossijskoj Federatsii / Tsentr otraslevoj ehkonomiki. NIFI. 2017. (Doklad).

21. S.V.Nekrasov. Territorii operezhayuschego sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya (TOR) kak instrument razvitiya monogorodov / Tsentr mezhbyudzhetnykh otnoshenij NIFI. 2017. (Doklad).

22. Platova V.V., Rostovskij N.S., Smirnov D.S. Analiz metodik otsenki ehffektivno- sti deyatel'nosti osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon Rossii / Nauchnye itogi goda: dosti- zheniya, proekty, gipotezy. №6. 2016 S. 178-185.

23. Gromov V. Analiz ehffektivnosti funktsionirovaniya osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon v Rossijskoj Federatsii / Russian Economic Development, Vol. 25. №2. 2018. S. 25-32

24. Kornienko O.V., Pestereva A.V., Tsyan' Lin'. Kriticheskaya otsenka dejstvuyuschikh pod- khodov k analizu ehffektivnosti rossijskikh osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon / Vektor nauki TGU. Seriya: Ehkonomika i upravlenie. 2016. №4(27). S. 49-54.

25. Rejting industrial'nykh parkov i osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon / Ehkspert. 2017.

26. Biznes-navigator po osobym ehkonomicheskim zonam Rossii – 2017 / I.V. Golubkin, M.M. Bukharova, L.V. Danilov i dr.; Assotsiatsiya klasterov i tekhnoparkov // M.: AKIT. 2017.

27. Platova V.V., Rostovskij N.S., Smirnov D.S. Razrabotka kompleksnoj otsenki ehf- fektivnosti funktsionirovaniya osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon Rossii // Innovatsii v nauke. 2017. № 4(65) R. 68-73.

28. Kuznetsova, O.V. Osobye ehkonomicheskie zony: ehffektivny ili net? // Prostran- stvennaya Ehkonomika. 2016. №4. S. 129-152. DOI: 10.14530/se.2016.4.129-152 (accessed 10.02.2018).

29. Otchet o rezul'tatakh funktsionirovaniya osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon za 2015 god i za period s nachala funktsionirovaniya osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon / Ministerstvo ehkono- micheskogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federatsii http://economy.gov.ru/minec/about/structure/deposobeczone/20160930 (accessed 24.03.2018).

30. Otchet o rezul'tatakh funktsionirovaniya osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon za 2016 god i za period s nachala funktsionirovaniya osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon / Ministerstvo ehkonomicheskogo raz- vitiya Rossijskoj Federatsii http://economy.gov.ru/minec/about/structure/depOsobEcZone/201703070 (accessed 24.03.2018).

31. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 07.07.2016 N 643 "O poryadke otsenki ehffektivno- sti funktsionirovaniya osobykh ehkonomicheskikh zon".