All
 
|
 
 


Open Government mechanisms as a way to increase openness, accountability and anti-corruption in Russia
 
PIIS086904990023198-9-1
DOI10.31857/S086904990023198-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Egor Artemenko 
Occupation: Expert of The Laboratory for Anti-Corruption Policy, National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University);
Affiliation: Higher School of Economics (HSE University)
Address: Russian Federation, 101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya str., 20
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 10
Pages64-77
Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the need for openness, transparency, accountability of government bodies, as well for the dialogue between society and the state regarding the implementation of management decisions. The paper presents a theoretical analysis of the relationship between the level of openness and the efficiency of public administration, supporting anti-corruption, including on the basis of foreign experience. The empirical basis of the research is the mechanism of "open government" that was implemented in 2011 in more than 70 countries including Russia, and analyzed by the author. The result of the research is the preparation of a methodological and organizational model for evaluating and carrying out international and new initiatives that have been successfully implemented in the field of public administration.

Keywordscorruption, openness, transparency, accountability, civil society, authorities
Received08.12.2023
Publication date08.12.2023
Number of characters28561
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 62

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Belyaeva A.D. Zarubezhnyj opyt stanovleniya i razvitiya informatsionnogo obschestva (Ehstoniya) // Gumanitarnyj aktsent. 2019. № 4. S. 29–34.
2. Blauberg I.I. Bergson // Filosofskaya antropologiya. 2019. № 2. S. 118–135.
3. Efimov A.A. Ehlektronnoe pravitel'stvo Yaponii v kontekste vnutrennej i vneshnej politiki gosudarstva // EhSGI. 2015. № 3 (7). S. 101–107.
4. Kasatkina N.M. Otkrytoe pravitel'stvo za rubezhom. Pravovoe regulirovanie i praktika: monografiya // INFRA-M. 2022. XXIV. – 234 s. URL: www.dx.doi.org/10.12737/7198
5. Klimenko A.S., Lezina E.P. Kontseptsiya "otkrytogo obschestva" Karla Poppera // Kontentus. 2018. № 1 (66). – 7 s.
6. Pimenov N.A. Problemy korruptsii v Rossii // Finansy: teoriya i praktika. 2011. № 4. S. 21–26.
7. Polterovich V.M. Transplantatsiya ehkonomicheskikh institutov // Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii. 2001. № 3. S. 24–50.
8. Bovens M., Hart P. (2016) Revisiting the study of policy failures, Journal of European Public Policy, 23:5, 653-666. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1127273
9. Cuéllar, M-F, Stephenson M. (2020) Taming Systemic Corruption: The American Experience and its Implications for Contemporary Debates. Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 20–29.
10. Hellmann O. (2017) The historical origins of corruption in the developing world: a comparative analysis of East Asia. Crime Law Soc Change 68, 145–165. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9679-6 
11. Howlett M., Mukherjee I. (2014) Policy design and non-design: Towards a spectrum of policy formulation types. Politics and Governance, 2(2), 57–71.
12. McConnell A. (2012) Understanding policy success. Rethinking public policy// Public Administration. 90 (4). DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02057.x
13. Nort D. (1981) Structure and Change in Economic History. New York.
14. Popa M. (2015) Elites and Corruption: A Theory of Endogenous Reform and a Test Using British Data. World Politics, 67(2), 313–352. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000040 
15. Rhodes R.A.W., Marsh D. (1992) Policy network in British politics. A critique of existing approaches // Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Roland G. (2000) Transition and Economics. Politics, Markets and Firms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
17. Schudson M. (2006) The Trouble with Experts – and Why Democracies Need Them.
18. Stiglitz J. (2000) Scan globally, reinvent locally: knowledge infrastructure and the localization of knowledge. In: Diane Stone (ed.) Banking on Knowledge. The Genesis of the Global Development Network. Rp. 24–43.
19. Wijnhoven F., Ehrenhard M., Kuhn J. (2020) The survival of open government platforms: Empirical insights from a global sample. Government Information Quarterly 38(1).
20. Zhenbin Y., Kankanhalli A., Ha S., Kumar Tayi G. (2020) What drives public agencies to participate in open government data initiatives? an innovation resource perspective. Inf. Manage. 57. 3. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103179

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up