Digital Economy as Conceptual Voluntarism in Economic Management

Occupation: Professor at the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow
Affiliation:
Academy of Military Sciences of the Russian Federation
Public Administration Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation

Vladimir Nikolaevsky

Affiliation: Belarusian National Technical University
Address: Minsk, Republic of Belarus

S. Sidorenko

Occupation: Head of the Expert Management dept. Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation

Journal name

Obshchestvo i ekonomika

Edition

Issue 11

Pages

20-45

Abstract

The institutional model and structure of the economic system are considered as a methodological basis for understanding the essence of the "digital economy". The main elements and factors that clearly indicate that in scientific circulation the term "digital economy" is identified with one of the elements of the economic system – information and communication technologies - and in essence the concept is a scientific deviation. Which makes it difficult to form a new way of economic thinking and managerial decision-making. This is especially evident in the formation of the semantic core of concepts.

Keywords

economic system, information and communication technologies, "digital economy"

Received

25.12.2023

Publication date

26.12.2023

Number of characters

61003

Cite

GOST	Dadalko V., Nikolaevsky V., Sidorenko S. "Digital Economy" as Conceptual Voluntarism in Economic Management // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2023. – Issue 11 C. 20-45 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760028784-1-1 (circulation date: 03.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760028784-1
MLA	Dadalko, Vasily, Nikolaevsky, Vladimir, Sidorenko, S. ""Digital Economy" as Conceptual Voluntarism in Economic Management." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 11 (2023):20-45. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760028784-1
APA	Dadalko V., Nikolaevsky V., Sidorenko S. (2023). "Digital Economy" as Conceptual Voluntarism in Economic Management. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (11), pp.20-45 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760028784-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 87

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Butenko E.D. 2020. Opredelenie tsifrovoj ehkonomiki. Mneniya, vzglyady, otsenki // Vestnik Severo-Kavkazskogo federal'nogo universiteta. 2020. № 3 (78). S. 209–223.

2. Glaz'ev S.Yu. Otkrytie zakonomernosti smeny tekhnologicheskikh ukladov v TsEhMI AN SSSR // Ehkonomika i matematicheskie metody. 2018.Tom 54. № 3. S. 17–30.

3. Danilin I.V. Kitaj i SShA – lidery tsifrovoj ehkonomiki: sopostavitel'nyj analiz i vyvody / Doklad na Uchenom sovete IMEhMO RAN 11.09.2019 g. URL: https://www.imemo.ru/files/File/ru/events/2019/11092019_Danilin_Presentation.pdf

4. Ivanov V.V., Malinetskij G.G. Tsifrovaya ehkonomika: mify, real'nost', perspektiva. Rossijskaya akademiya nauk. 2017. – 64 s.

5. Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya ehpokha: ehkonomika, obschestvo i kul'tura. M.: GU VShEh. 2000.

6. Klejner G.B. Sistemnaya ehkonomika: shagi razvitiya / Monografiya. Izdatel'skij dom «Nauchnaya biblioteka». 2021. – 746 s.

7. Makarov V.L. Predislovie / Klejner G.B. Sistemnaya ehkonomika: shagi razvitiya: monografiya. Izdatel'skij dom «Nauchnaya biblioteka». 2021. – 746 s.

8. Marshal A. Osnovy ehkonomicheskoj nauki. M. «Izdatel'stvo «Ehksmo». 2008. – 832 s.

9. Mel'nik M.V., Salin V.N. Predposylki ehffektivnogo razvitiya tsifrovoj ehkonomiki // Uchet. Analiz. Audit. 2018. T. 5. № 6. S. 10.

10. Nikolaevskij V.V., Rudkovskaya O.G. Nelinejnaya dinamika razvitiya i proektnyj podkhod v metodologii strategicheskogo finansovogo planirovaniya // Nauchnye issledovaniya ehkonomicheskogo fakul'teta. Ehlektronnyj zhurnal. 2019. Tom. 10. Vyp. 3. S. 7–26.

11. Stepin V.S. Filosofiya nauki. Obschie problemy. M.: Gardariki. 2006. – 384 s.

12. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. M.: Progress-Traditsiya. 2003. – 744 s.

13. Shvab K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. M.: «Ehksmo». 2016. – 136 s.

14. Ehngel's F. Proiskhozhdenii sem'i, chastnoj sobstvennosti i gosudarstva. M.: AST. 2019. – 288 s.

15. Bukht R., Heeks R. Defining, Conceptualising and Measuring the Digital Economy // Manchester Centre for Development Informatics Working Paper № 68. 2017. – 26 r.

16. DER 2019. Digital Economy Report 2019 – UNCTAD 2019. URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/officialdocument/der2019_overview_ru.pdf

17. DER 2021. Digital Economy Report 2021: Cross-border data flows and development: For whom the data flow // Geneva: United Nations Publications. 2021. – 238 p.

18. Ebert C. Digital Transformation / C. Ebert, C. Duarte // IEEE Software. 2018. № 35. P. 16–21.

19. Goloventchik G.G., Kovalev M.M. Digital transformation and economic growth (on the example of the Belarusian economy) // J. Belarus. State Univ. Econ. 2018. №. 1. P. 102–121 (in Russ.)

20. Lane N. Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research. Department of Commerce. Remarks by Dr. Neal Lane. Assistant to the President for Science and Technology. 1999. URL:https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/textonly/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/99_6_9.html

21. Maddison A. The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Paris: Development Centre Studies OESD. 2003. – 273 p.

22. Milgrom P., Roberts J. The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization // American Economic Review. June 1990. Vol. 80. No 3. P. 511–528.

23. Milgrom P., Roberts J. Complementarities and Systems: Understanding Japanese Economic Organization (April 19, 1994). URL: https://web.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Milgrom-Roberts- complements%20&%20Japan.pdf

24. NIC2021. Global Trends 2040: A More Contested World. Washington D.C.: The National Intelligence Council. 2021. – 156 p.

25. NIST2013. Foundations for Innovation in Cyber-Physical Systems. Workshop Report. January 2013. Maryland : NIST. 2013.

26. OECD2020. Report for the G20 Digital Economy Task Force: A roadmap toward a common framework for measuring the digital economy. Geneva. OECD. 2020. – 123 r.

27. Tapscott D. 1995. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence // Semantic Scholar. P. 25. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a832/0ab8d4a6c0a1d0578c6e01288b03cb00de4a.pdf

28. WDR 2020. World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains// Washington D.C. The World Bank. – 293 p. (P.20).

29. WDR2016. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington D.C. The World Bank. 2016. – 359 p.