The Structure of the National Economy of Russia: the Phenomenon of a Hy-brid

 
PIIS020736760028114-4-1
DOI10.31857/S020736760028114-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Institute of Economics (RAS)
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 10
Pages78-88
Abstract

In this compact article, the analysis is focused on the phenomenon of the heterogeneous structure of the modern national economy, which can rightfully be identified as hybrid. The relationship between the divergence of institutional orders and agency structures in Russian economy is considered. The objective reason for the approval of the state-capitalist structure, which dominates the hybrid national economic system, is substantiated.

Keywordseconomic system, institutions, agents, hybrid structure, state-capitalist structure
Received08.12.2023
Publication date08.12.2023
Number of characters19090
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 60

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Nikiforov L.V. Obschestvennye sistemy smeshannogo tipa: soderzhanie i istoricheskaya perspektiva / «Smeshannoe obschestvo»: rossijskij variant. Gl. 2. // M.: Nauka. 1999. S. 44–73.

2. Nikiforov L.V. Smeshannoe integratsionnoe obschestvo v Rossii: osobennosti i strate-gicheskie orientiry razvitiya / «Smeshannoe obschestvo»: rossijskij variant. Gl. 4. // M.: Nauka. 1999. S. 107–141.

3. Australian System of national accounts: concepts, sources and methods. Chapter 4. Institutional units and sectors. 9 July 2021. URL: https://www.abs.gov.au

4. Qian Y. 2000. “The Institutional Foundations of China’s Market Transition”, in Pleskovic, B and Stiglitz, J. (ed.) Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics 1999. // Wash., DC: World Bank, pp. 377–398.

5. Guriev S. Promezhutochnye instituty. Kakovy usloviya i riski ikh raboty. 20 noyabrya 2017 g. www.svop.ru.

6. Radygin A. Rossiya v 2000-2004 godakh: na puti k gosudarstvennomu kapitalizmu? // Vopro-sy ehkonomiki. 2006. № 4. C. 71–78.

7. Mal'ginov G.V., Radygin A.D. Smeshannaya sobstvennost' v korporativnom sektore: ehvolyu-tsiya, upravlenie, regulirovanie // M.: IEhPP. 2007.

8. Martynov A.V. Fenomen novogo gosudarstvennogo kapitalizma: pora politiko-ehkonomicheskogo osmysleniya // Reputatsiologiya. 2023. № 1-2. C. 46–53.

9. Minfin zayavil ob otsutstvii na povestke dnya voprosa o krupnoj privatizatsii. 11 maya 2023 g. URL: https://www.rbc.ru › Ehkonomika.

10. Strany s perekhodnoj ehkonomikoj: MVF rassmatrivaet ikh progress i perspektivy. 3 noyabrya 2000 g. URL: https://www.imf.org› external› 2000.

11. Wright M., Wood G., Musacchio A., Okhmatovskiy I., Grosman A., and Doh J. 2021. State capitalism in international context: Varieties and variations. Journal of World Business. 56, 101160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101160

12. Bremmer I. 2010. The end of the free market: who wins the war between states and corpora-tions? N. Y.

13. Nolke A. 2018. Dependent versus state-permeated capitalism: two basic options for emerging markets // International Journal of Management and Economics. 54(4), pp. 269–282. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2018-0026.

14. Rossijskaya ehkonomika v 2022 godu // Tendentsii i perspektivy. Vypusk 44. M., 2023, C. 155–158; C. 182–188.

15. Xiong W. Derisking Real Estate in China’s Hybrid Economy. NBER. WORKING PA-PER 31118. DOI: 10.3386/w31118.

16. Tsifrovaya transformatsiya: ozhidaniya i real'nost'. Doklad NIU VShEh // M.: izdatel'-skij dom VShEh, 2022. URL: https://www.issek. hse.ru › mirror › share

17. Strukturnaya modernizatsiya rossijskoj ehkonomiki: usloviya, napravleniya, mekhanizmy // SPb.: Aletejya, 2022.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up