Health Of The Working Population Of Russia: The Role Of Hazardous Industries

This study provides an empirical assessment of the relationship between health and harmful and hazardous jobs. Based on RLMS-HSE data for 2009–2021 for the employed population aged 18–72 years, models of the relationship between the working conditions of an individual and the probability of good self-assessment of health are considered; absence of health problems in the last 30 days and comorbidities. Empirical models include time lags in health, employment in hazardous industries, and investment in health. Estimates of the model parameters confirmed the existence of an expected statistically significant negative relationship between harmful and (or) hazardous working conditions and workers' health.

Keywords

health, hazardous occupations, Grossman model, RLMS

Received

24.04.2023

Publication date

25.04.2023

Number of characters

32436

Cite

GOST	, Aistov A., Aleksandrova E. Health Of The Working Population Of Russia: The Role Of Hazardous Industries // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2023. – Issue 4 C. 86-104 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760025156-0-1 (circulation date: 20.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760025156-0
MLA	, , Aistov, Andrey, Aleksandrova, Ekaterina "Health Of The Working Population Of Russia: The Role Of Hazardous Industries." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 4 (2023):86-104. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760025156-0
APA	, Aistov A., Aleksandrova E. (2023). Health Of The Working Population Of Russia: The Role Of Hazardous Industries. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (4), pp.86-104 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760025156-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 187

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Baidin V., Gerry C. J., Kaneva M. How self-rated is self-rated health? Exploring the role of individual and institutional factors in reporting heterogeneity in Russia // Social Indicators Research. 2021. T. 155, №. 2. R. 675-696.

2. Buttner E. Entrepreneurial stress: is it hazardous to your health? // Journal of managerial issues. 1992. P. 223-240.

3. Cardon M., Patel P. Is stress worth it? Stress‐related health and wealth trade‐offs for entrepreneurs // Applied Psychology. 2015. Vol. 64, no. 2. P. 379-420. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12021.

4. Case A., Deaton A. Broken down by work and sex: How our health declines / eds. Wise D. Analyses in the Economics of Aging. 2005. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 416 p.

5. Contoyannis P., Jones A., Rice N. The dynamics of health in the British Household Panel Survey // Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2004. Vol. 19, n. 4. P. 473-503. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.755.

6. Cottini E., Lucifora C. Mental health and working conditions in Europe //ILR Review. 2013. Vol. 66, no. 4. P. 958-988. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391306600409.

7. Defebvre E. Harder, Better, Faster... Yet Stronger? Working Conditions and Self-Declaration of Chronic Diseases // Health Economics. 2018. Vol. 27, no. 3. P. e59-e76. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3619.

8. Fern´andez-Val I. Fixed effects estimation of structural parameters and marginal effects in panel probit models // Journal of Econometrics. 2009. Vol. 150, no. 1. P. 71–85. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.02.007.

9. Fletcher J., Sindelar J., Yamaguchi S. Cumulative effects of job characteristics on health // Health economics. 2011. Vol. 20, no. 5. P. 553-570. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1616.

10. Gerry C.J., Baydin V.M. Sources of bias in self-assessed health // Farmakoekonomika. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2018. Vol. 10. №. 4. P. 31-36. (In Russ.)

11. Giammarioli A. Working conditions and health inequalities / eds. Bankole F. Safety and Health for Workers-Research and Practical Perspective. United Kingdom: IntechOpen, 2020. 108 p.

12. Grossman M. On the concept of health capital and the demand for health // Journal of Political economy. 1972. Vol. 80, no. 2. P. 223-255. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/259880.

13. Hämmig O., Bauer G. The social gradient in work and health: a cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between working conditions and health inequalities // BMC Public Health. 2013. Vol. 13, no. 1. P. 1-13. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1170.

14. Hank K., Steinbach A. Families and health: A review / eds. Doblhammer G., Gumà J. A demographic perspective on gender, family and health in Europe. 2018. Switzerland: Springer Nature. 302 p.

15. Haveman R., Wolfe B., Kreider B., Stone M. Market work, wages, and men's health // Journal of health economics. 1994. Vol 13, №2. P. 163-82.

16. Lee J., Di Ruggiero E. How does informal employment affect health and health equity? Emerging gaps in research from a scoping review and modified e-Delphi survey // International Journal for Equity in Health. 2022. Vol. 21, no. 1. P. 1-12. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01684-7.

17. Llena-Nozal A. The effect of work status and working conditions on mental health in four OECD countries // National Institute Economic Review. 2009. Vol. 209, no. 1. P. 72-87. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950109345234.

18. Marmot M. Social differentials in health within and between populations // Daedulus. 1994. Vol. 123. P. 197–216.

19. Mathers C. Towards valid and comparable measurement of population health // Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2003. Vol. 81. P. 787-788.

20. Neyman J., Scott E. Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations // Econometrica. 1948. Vol. 16. P. 1–32. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914288.

21. Nomaguchi K., Milkie M. Costs and rewards of children: The effects of becoming a parent on adults' lives // Journal of marriage and family. 2003. Vol. 65, no. 2. P. 356-374. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00356.x.

22. Ravesteijn B., Kippersluis H., Doorslaer E. The wear and tear on health: What is the role of occupation? // Health economics. 2018. Vol. 27, no. 2. P. e69-e86. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3563.

23. Robone S., Jones A., Rice N. Contractual conditions, working conditions and their impact on health and well-being // The European Journal of Health Economics. 2011. Vol. 12, no. 5. P. 429-444. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-010-0256-0.

24. Saracci R. The World Health Organisation needs to reconsider its definition of health // BMJ. 1997. Vol. 314, no. 7091. P. 1409. URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7091.1409.

25. Schmitz L. Do working conditions at older ages shape the health gradient? // Journal of Health Economics. 2016. Vol. 50. P. 183-197. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.10.002.

26. Schram J, Groeniger J., Schuring M., Proper K., van Oostrom S., Robroek S., Burdorf A. Working conditions and health behavior as causes of educational inequalities in self-rated health: an inverse odds weighting approach // Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2021. Vol. 47, no. 2. P. 127. URL: https://doi.org/10.5271%2Fsjweh.3918.

27. Shokouh S., Mohammad A., Emamgholipour S., Rashidian A., Montazeri A., Zaboli R. Conceptual models of social determinants of health: a narrative review // Iranian journal of public health. 2017. Vol. 46, no. 4. P. 435.

28. Wagstaff A. The demand for health: some new empirical evidence // Journal of Health economics. 1986. Vol. 5, no. 3. P. 195-233. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6296 (86)90015-9.

29. World Health Organization. Basic documents: forty-ninth edition (including amendments adopted up to 31 May 2019) / Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

30. World Health Organization. Protecting workers' health. – URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/protecting-workers'-health (data obrascheniya: 29.01.2023)

31. Wuorela M., Lavonius S., Salminen M., Vahlberg T., Viitanen M., Viikari L. Self-rated health and objective health status as predictors of all-cause mortality among older people: A prospective study with a 5-, 10-, and 27-year follow-up // BMC Geriatrics. 2020. Vol. 20. P. 1-7. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01516-9.

32. Aistov A.V. Dokhody respondentov raznykh pokolenij // Prikladnaya ehkonometrika. 2018. T. 2, № 50. S. 23-42.

33. Rossijskaya Federatsiya. Trudovoj kodeks Rossijskoj Federatsii: Feder. zakon № 197-FZ: prinyat Gosudarstvennoj Dumoj 21 dekabrya 2001 g.: odobren Sovetom Federatsii 26 dekabrya 2001 g.: posled. red.// Konsul'tantPlyus: sajt. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34683/0ebdcb551bf2ed8c72f5a691d75f1aac5297f061/ (data obrascheniya: 10.02.2023).

34. Roschina Ya.M. Otdacha ot pozitivnykh i negativnykh investitsij v zdorov'e // M.: Izdatel'skij dom GU-VShEh. 2008. – 88 s.

35. Usloviya truda: Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/usl_trud1.xlsx (Data obrascheniya 01.02.2023).

36. Cherkashina T.Yu. Rabota na pensii: neobkhodimost' ili vozmozhnost'? // Vserossijskij ehkonomicheskij zhurnal EhKO. 2011. T. 4. № 442. S. 101-114.