Paradigmatic framework for the development of monetary theories: features of formation

The article discusses the features of the formation of the paradigmatic framework for the development of monetary theories. The neoclassical impasse in the development of the theory of value and the paradigmatic limitations of the monetary theories of the mainstream are shown. The specificity of the cognitive potential of K. Marx's institutional-evolutionary theory of money, proposed within the framework of the classical paradigm, is revealed. On this basis, the features of rethinking the paradigmatic framework for the study of monetary issues in the context of using the ideas of the classical tradition are considered.

Keywords

value theory, money, monetary theory, macroeconomics, classical paradigm, ethics, institutions

Publication date

20.01.2022

Number of characters

46791

Cite

GOST	Biryukov V. Paradigmatic framework for the development of monetary theories: features of formation // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2022. – Issue 1 C. 72-91 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760018278-4-1 (circulation date: 01.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760018277-3
MLA	Biryukov, Vitalij "Paradigmatic framework for the development of monetary theories: features of formation." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 1 (2022):72-91. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760018277-3
APA	Biryukov V. (2022). Paradigmatic framework for the development of monetary theories: features of formation. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (1), pp.72-91 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760018277-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 385

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Grinberg R. Kakoj budet novaya model' ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya? // Mir peremen. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-obschestvennyj zhurnal. 2020. № 2. S. 5-8.

2. Efimov V.M. O dvukh tipakh sotsial'nykh poryadkov. Ch. I // Voprosy teoreticheskoj ehkonomiki. 2018. № 1. S. 7-25.

3. Lawson T. The Constitution and Nature of Money // Cambridge Journal of Economics. Oxford University Press. 2018. Vol. 42. No 3. P. 851-873.

4. Kirdina-Chehndler S.G. O den'gakh i sotsial'nykh poryadkakh (razmyshleniya nad stat'ej V.M. Efimova) // Voprosy teoreticheskoj ehkonomiki. 2019. № 2. S. 32-42.

5. Khudokormov A.G. Novye dannye o «tret'em krizise» ehkonomiks // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii. 2021. № 1 (25). S. 103-125.

6. Biryukov V. Dualisticheskaya teoriya stoimosti i osobennosti izucheniya ehkonomiki kak slozhnoj sistemy // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2021. № 10. S. 20-40.

7. Baumol' U. Chego ne znal Al'fred Marshall: vklad XX stoletiya v ehkonomicheskuyu teoriyu // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2001. № 2. S. 73-107.

8. Pirs A. Teoriya sprosa, renta i suverenitet potrebitelya // Sovremennaya ehkonomicheskaya mysl' // M.: Progress. 1981. S. 317-358.

9. Viner Dzh. Kontseptsiya poleznosti v teorii tsennosti i ee kritiki // Vekhi ehkonomicheskoj mysli. Teoriya potrebitel'skogo povedeniya i sprosa. T. 1 // SPb.: Ehkonomicheskaya shkola. 2000. S. 78-116.

10. Reder M. W. Studies in the Theory of Welfare Economics // New York: Columbia University Press. 1947. 208 p.

11. Scitovsky T. Welfare and Competition // London: Allen and Unwin. 1952. 457 p.

12. Polterovich V.M. Stanovlenie obschego sotsial'nogo analiza // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2012. № 2. S. 101-111.

13. Ehrrou K.Dzh. K teorii tsenovogo prisposobleniya // Teoriya firmy // SPb.: Ehkonomicheskaya shkola. 1995. S. 432-447.

14. Nekipelov A.D. Krizis v ehkonomicheskoj nauke – priroda i puti preodoleniya // Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2019. T. 89. № 1. S. 24-37.

15. Dyurkgejm Eh. O razdelenii obschestvennogo truda // M.: Kanon. 1996. 432 s.

16. Shumpeter J. Istoriya ehkonomicheskogo analiza / Per. s angl. pod red. V.S. Avtonomova, v 3-kh t. T. 3 // SPb.: Ehkonomicheskaya shkola. 2001. 688 s.

17. Davis A.E. Money as a Social Institution. The Institutional Development of Capitalism // London: Routledge. 2017. 208 p.

18. Mizes L. fon. Teoriya deneg i kredita // Chelyabinsk: Sotsium. 2012. 808 s.

19. Huber J. Sovereign Money. Beyond Reserve Banking // London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2017. 206 r.

20. B'erg U. Kak delayutsya den'gi? Filosofiya postkreditnogo kapitalizma // M.: Ad Marginem Press. 2018. 312 s.

21. Dubyanskij A.N. Gosudarstvennaya teoriya deneg G. Knappa: istoriya i sovremennost' // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2015. № 3. S. 109-125.

22. Seligmen B. Osnovnye techeniya sovremennoj ehkonomicheskoj mysli // M.: Progress. 1968. 600 s.

23. Humphrey T.M. Nonneutrality of Money in Classical Monetary Thought // Economic Quarterly. 1991. Vol. 77. No. 2. Federal Reserve Bank Richmond. P. 3-15.

24. Kejns Dzh.M. Obschaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg // Antologiya ehkonomicheskoj klassiki. T.2 // M.: EhKONOV. 1993. S. 137-424.

25. Dehvidson P. Postkejnsianskaya shkola v makroehkonomicheskoj teorii // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2006. № 8. S. 82-101.

26. Dubyanskij A.N. Teoriya deneg Marksa: istoricheskij analiz // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ehkonomika. 2019. T. 35. Vyp. 1. S. 153-169.

27. Marks K. Kapital. T. 1. // M.: Politizdat. 1988. 981 s.

28. Marks K. Kapital. T. 3. Ch. 2. // M.: Politizdat. 1986. 1080 s.

29. Burlachkov V. Vosproizvodstvo i monetarnaya sfera // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2009. № 5. S. 129-135.

30. Maevskij V.I. O bazovykh predposylkakh ne-nejtral'nosti deneg v ehkonomicheskoj teorii // Journal of Institutional Studies. 2021. Vol. 13. № 1. S. 6-19.

31. Marks K. Kapital. T. 3. Ch. 1. // M.: Politizdat. 1986. 508 s.

32. Biryukov V. Tsennosti, instituty i ehkonomicheskoe razvitie // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2020. № 4. S. 5-24.

33. Mehnk'yu N.G. Makroehkonomist kak uchenyj i inzhener // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2009. № 5. S. 86-103.

34. Devidson P. Postkejnsianskaya teoriya deneg i problema inflyatsii / Sovremennaya ehkonomicheskaya mysl' // M.: Progress. 1981. S. 398-429.

35. Kharris L. Denezhnaya teoriya // M.: Progress. 1990. 750 s.

36. Mitchell W., Wray L. R., Watts W. Macroeconomics // London: Macmillan; Red Globe Press. 2019.

37. Andryushin S.A. Den'gi – ehto tvorenie gosudarstva ili rynka? (O «sovremennoj denezhnoj teorii», izlozhennoj v uchebnike U. Mitchella, L. R. Reya i M. Uottsa «Makroehkonomika») // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2020. № 6. S. 121-134.

38. Goryunov E. L., Drobushevskij S. M., Mau V. A., Trunin P. V. Chto my (ne) znaem ob ehffektivnosti instrumentov DKP v sovremennom mire // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2021. № 2. S. 5-34.