The dualistic theory of value and the prculiarities of studying economics as a complex system

The article analyzes the cognitive potential of the classical paradigm and the theory of K. Marx for understanding the systemic connections of economics. The model of an isolated economy is considered as a prerequisite for studying the logic of the formation of basic economic notions. The author reveals the peculiarities of K.Marx’s dualistic approach to the analysis of value relationships, as well as to the development of the theory of supply of goods and to the theory of demand. The importance of this approach is shown for revising the ideas about the cost and productivity of labor as basic categories, as well as about the whole categorial grid of economic theory.

Keywords

cost, value, utility, labor productivity, dual measurement system, value, temporal structures, classical paradigm, economic models, economic institutions

Received

20.07.2021

Publication date

09.12.2021

Number of characters

50289

Cite

GOST	Biryukov V. The dualistic theory of value and the prculiarities of studying economics as a complex system // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2021. – Issue 10 C. 20-40 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760015969-4-1 (circulation date: 02.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760015969-4
MLA	Biryukov, Vitalij "The dualistic theory of value and the prculiarities of studying economics as a complex system." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 10 (2021):20-40. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760015969-4
APA	Biryukov V. (2021). The dualistic theory of value and the prculiarities of studying economics as a complex system. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (10), pp.20-40 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760015969-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 457

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Nekipelov A. D. «Novyj pragmatizm» professora G. Kolodko: al'ternativa ili dopolnenie chistoj ehkonomicheskoj teorii? // Voprosy teoreticheskoj ehkonomiki. 2017. № 1. S. 22–39.

2. Anan'in O. Ehkonomicheskie ontologii i ehkonomicheskie instituty // Federalizm. 2013. № 1. S.75 – 100.

3. Biryukov V. Formirovanie kontseptsiya ehkonomicheskogo vremeni v usloviyakh smeny nauchnoj paradigmy // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2019. № 5. S. 40 – 52.

4. Frumkin K. G. Karl Marks v istorii ehkonomicheskoj mysli // Istoricheskaya ehkspertiza. 2018. № 3 (18). S. 138 - 156.

5. Ehngel's F. Nabroski k kritike politicheskoj ehkonomii // K. Marks i F. Ehngel's. Soch. 2-e izd. T. 1. M.: Gos. izd-vo polit. literatury, 1955. S. 544 – 576.

6. Robinson J. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital // Review of Economic Studies. 1953 – 1954. Vol. 21. No 2. P. 81 – 106.

7. Koehn A., Kharkurt Dzh. Sud'ba diskussii dvukh Kembridzhej o teorii kapitala // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2009. № 8. S. 4 - 27.

8. Afanas'ev V. Metod ehkonomicheskoj dvojstvennosti // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2005. № 8. S. 4 – 18.

9. Voejkov M.I. O sotsial'noj versii stoimosti // Karl Marks: klassika i sovremennost' (k 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya) / Pod red. M.I. Voejkova. M.: IEh RAN, 2018. S. 42 – 47.

10. Robbins L. Predmet ehkonomicheskoj nauki // THESIS. 1993. Vyp. 1. S. 10 – 23.

11. Menger K. Osnovaniya politicheskoj ehkonomii // Avstrijskaya shkola v politicheskoj ehkonomii: K. Menger, E. Bem-Baverk, F. Vizer. M.: Ehkonomika, 1992. S. 31 – 242.

12. Pogrebnyak A. A. Isklyuchenie i pravilo. Politehkonomicheskie argumenty N.I. Zibera protiv marzhinalizma do ego triumfa // Terra Economicus. 2020, 18 (3). S. 108–124.

13. Ojken V. Osnovy natsional'noj ehkonomii. M.: Ehkonomika, 1996. 351s.

14. Chaplygina I. G. Traktovka tvorchestva M. I. Tugan-Baranovskogo v zapadnoj literature // Voprosy teoreticheskoj ehkonomiki. 2018. № 1. S. 50 – 57.

15. Avtonomov V. S. Metodologiya «Osnov politicheskoj ehkonomii» M. I. Tugan-Baranovskogo v sopostavlenii s «Printsipov» A. Marshalla // Voprosy teoreticheskoj ehkonomiki. 2019. № 1. S. 24 – 29.

16. Allison F. Value and Prices in Russian Economic Thought: A Journey inside the Russian Synthesis. 1890–1920. L.; N.Y.: Routledge, 2015. 202 p.

17. Marks K. Kapital. T.1. M.: Politizdat, 1988. 891 s.

18. Bekker G. S. Ehkonomicheskij analiz i chelovecheskoe povedenie // THESIS. 1993. Vyp. 1. S. 24 – 40.

19. Marks K. Kapital. T. 3. Ch.2. M.: Politizdat, 1986. 1080 s.

20. Aristotel'. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 4. M.: Mysl', 1984. 830 s.

21. Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov // Antologiya ehkonomicheskoj klassiki. T. 1. M.: Ehkonov-Klyuch, 1993. S. 79–396.

22. Kurts Kh. D. Marks i «zakon stoimosti». Kriticheskaya otsenka po sluchayu 200-letiya so dnya rozhdeniya // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2018. № 11. S. 27 – 49.

23. Marsden R. The Nature of Capital. Marx after Foucault. London; New York: Routledge, 1999. 256 p.

24. Marks K. Kapital. T. 3. Ch.1. M.: Politizdat, 1985. 508 s.

25. Knyazev Yu. O trudovoj teorii stoimosti // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2004. № 3. S. 137 – 148.

26. Afanas'ev V. Vklad avstrijskoj shkoly v razvitie trudovoj teorii stoimosti (k probleme edinstva ehkonomicheskoj teorii) // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2002. № 2. S. 102 – 117.

27. Anan'in O.I. V sisteme Marksa est' neskol'ko teorij // Karl Marks: klassika i sovremennost' (k 200-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya) / Pod red. M.I. Voejkova. M.: IEh RAN, 2018. S. 37 – 41.

28. Tugan-Baranovskij M. I. Sotsializm kak polozhitel'noe uchenie // Obraz buduschego v russkoj sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoj mysli kontsa XlX – nachala XX veka: Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Respublika. 1994. S. 202 – 250.

29. Maevskij V. Vosproizvodstvo osnovnogo kapitala i ehkonomicheskaya teoriya // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2010. № 3. S. 65 – 85.

30. Kejns Dzh. M. Obschaya teoriya zanyatosti, protsenta i deneg // Antologiya ehkonomicheskoj klassiki. T.2. M.: EhKONOV, 1993. S. 137- 424.

31. 31. Biryukov V. Tsennosti, instituty i ehkonomicheskoe razvitie // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2020. № 4. S. 5–24.

32. Adzhemoglu D., Robinson Dzh. A. Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. M.: AST, 2016. 695 s.

33. Stiglitz J. E. People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. New York; London: W.W. Norton, 2019. 366 p.