Spatial approach to the definition of digital economy

The paper considers a spatial approach to the definition of the digital economy phenomenon. The author uses the methods of comparative and interdisciplinary analysis. In the article a spatial-structural model of digital economy is proposed. The approach to designing such a model is infrastructurally determined and technologically neutral at the same time. The spatial-structural model allows us to conclude that various spatial fragments of the national economic system have achieved different development stages. Such an economic system development stage depends on the availability and type of infrastructure. The paper justifies the criterion (i.e. the necessary condition) for the economic system transition to the digital stage of development, and the definition of “big data infrastructure”. The research results are suitable for the purpose of spatial planning of infrastructural elements.

Keywords

digital economics, digital infrastructure, institutional regional studies, digital divide

Received

20.06.2021

Publication date

22.06.2021

Number of characters

26518

Cite

GOST	Sharifyanov T. Spatial approach to the definition of digital economy // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2014. – Issue 7-8 C. 48-60 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760015393-1-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760015393-1
MLA	Sharifyanov, Timur "Spatial approach to the definition of digital economy." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 7-8 (2014):48-60. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760015393-1
APA	Sharifyanov T. (2014). Spatial approach to the definition of digital economy. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (7-8), pp.48-60 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760015393-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 647

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Strategiya nauchno-tekhnicheskogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federatsii. Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federatsii ot 01 dekabrya 2016 g. № 642. Pasport natsional'nogo proekta «Tsifrovaya ehkonomika Rossijskoj Federatsii». Utverzhden Sovetom pri Prezidente Rossijskoj Federatsii po strategicheskomu razvitiyu i natsional'nym proektam (protokol ot 24 dekabrya 2018 g. № 16).

2. Pasport natsional'nogo proekta “Tsifrovaya ehkonomika Rossijskoj Federatsii”. Utverzhden prezidiumom Soveta pri Prezidente Rossijskoj Federatsii po strategicheskomu razvitiyu i natsional'nym proektam (protokol ot 24 dekabrya 2018 g. № 16).

3. UNCTAD, Digital Economy Report (United Nations publication, Geneva) https://unctad.org/meetings/en/SessionalDocuments/ciclpd54_ru.pdf

4. Makhlup F. Proizvodstvo i rasprostranenie znanij v SShA // M.: Progress. 1966. 462 s. («The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States». 1962).

5. Kornejchuk B.V. Informatsionnaya ehkonomika / Uchebnoe posobie // SPb.:Piter, 2006. 400 s.

6. Toffler Eh. Tret'ya volna /The Third Wave, 1980 // M.: AST. 2010. 784 s.

7. Bell D. Gryaduschee postindustrial'noe obschestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya / Perevod s anglijskogo // Moskva: Academia. 1999. 956 c.

8. Lappo G. M. Geografiya gorodov // M.: Vlados, 1997. 480 s. ISBN 5-691-00047-0. (obl.).

9. Ministerstvo tsifrovogo razvitiya RF. Prikaz ob utverzhdenii Kontseptsii postroeniya i razvitiya uzkopolosnykh besprovodnykh setej svyazi "Interneta veschej" na territorii Rossijskoj Federatsii. 2019.

10. Zubarevich N.V. Regiony Rossii: neravenstvo, krizis, modernizatsiya // M: Nezavisimyj institut sotsial'noj politiki. 2010. 160 s.

11. Friedmann John. Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela // MIT Press, 1966. 279 p.

12. Belousov Yu.V., Timofeeva O.I. Metodologiya opredeleniya tsifrovoj ehkonomiki.// Mir novoj ehkonomiki. 2019. № 13(3). S. 79-89.

13. Uehbster F. Teorii informatsionnogo obschestva // M.: Aspekt Press. 2004.

14. Stigler G. The Economic of Information // Journal of Political Economy. 1961. Vol. 69, 3.

15. Marshak J., Radner R. Economic Theory of Teams // Conn., 1972.

16. Lecrec B., Cale J. Big Data. 2020. Routledge. 148 p.

17. Gazeta "Kommersant'" № 205 ot 08.11.2018. S. 10. Bol'shie dannye idut na vyruchku. Sotovye operatory menyayut strukturu dokhodov https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3793127

18. Big Data Market Published Date: Mar 2020 / Report Code: TC 1521 Marketsandmarket. Analysis. URL: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/big-data-market-1068.html;

19. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2017/05/13/ibm-predicts-demand-for-data-scientists-will-soar-28-by-2020/#427b8e5c7e3b

20. Masuda Y. The Information Society as Postindustrial Society // Wash.: World Future Soc. 1983. 171 p.

21. Ermakov M.A. Sotsial'naya struktura informatsionnogo obschestva: sinteticheskaya model' // Sotsium i vlast'. 2014. №4 (48). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialnaya-struktura-informatsionnogo-obschestva-sinteticheskaya-model (data obrascheniya: 10.04.2020).

22. https://blog.globalwebindex.com/chart-of-the-day/social-media-captures-30-of-online-time/

23. Krugman P.R. Geography and Trade // MIT Press, Cambridge. MA. 1991.

24. Mesenbourg T.L. Measuring the digital economy // United States Bureau of the Census. 2001. P. 190-197.

25. Khabermas Yu. Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoj sfery: Issledovaniya otnositel'no kategorii burzhuaznogo obschestva // M.: Ves' Mir, 2016. 344 s.

26. Vershinskaya O.N. Suschestvuyuschie Modeli postroeniya informatsionnogo obschestva // Informatsionnoe obschestvo. 1999. S. 53-58.

27. Sharif'yanov T.F. Rasshirenie territorial'nykh granits tsifrovoj ehkonomiki // Voprosy regional'noj ehkonomiki №1 (42) 2020. S. 89-106.