About the feudalization of the current social and economic formation and the transition to a new one

 
PIIS020736760012606-5-1
DOI10.31857/S020736760012606-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: E. Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 11
Pages121-134
Abstract

The article shows that since the end of the 19th century society began to lose such values as "Freedom, Equality, Brotherhood", which had been conquered by the bourgeoisie in the 18th-19th centuries in the struggle against feudalism and its vestiges. The author states, that the process had its roots in the monopolization of production, and then, since the 1930s, in the state monopolization of economic management. Monopolization began to impart feudal forms to capitalist relations. The feudalization of relations deteriorated the economic and social indicators of developed countries. From that, the conclusion is drawn that the deepening of the contradictions caused by the monopolization of modern capitalism has led to the line beyond which the transition from capitalism to a new formation should follow.

Keywordshistorical process, capitalism, monopoly, remnants of feudalism, the state, outsiders, the cost of the necessary and surplus product
Received04.12.2020
Publication date04.12.2020
Number of characters30112
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 557

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bodrunov S. Disproportsiya mezhdu finansovym kapitalom i real'nym sektorom // Zhurnal «Vol'naya ehkonomika». 23 noyabrya 2018. https://zen.yandex.ru/media/freeconomy/disproporciia-mejdu-finansovym-kapitalom-i-realnym-sektorom

2. Vishnevskij V.P. Tsifrovaya ehkonomika v usloviyakh chetvertoj promyshlennoj revolyutsii: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ehkonomika. Tom 35. Vypusk 4. 2019. S. 606-627.

3. Voronov Yu.P. Ehksperimenty nad nischetoj (Nobelevskaya premiya po ehkonomike 2019 goda) // EhKO. 2020. №1(547). S. 76-94.

4. Dmitrieva O. Ushakov D. Inflyatsiya sprosa i inflyatsiya izderzhek: prichiny formirovaniya i formy rasprostraneniya // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2011. №3. S. 40-52.

5. Zabolotskaya V. Gosudarstvennye programmy podderzhki malogo biznesa v SShA // MEh i MO. 2019. T. 63. №12. S. 15-22.

6. Zamulin O.A., Sonin K.I. Ehkonomicheskij rost: Nobelevskaya premiya 2018 goda i uroki dlya Rossii // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2019. № 1. S. 11-36.

7. Kapkanschikov S. Struktura gosudarstvennykh raskhodov i ehkonomicheskij rost // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2020. №7. S. 16-31.

8. Kryukov V.A. Ot podkhoda 2D k podkhodu 4D // EhKO. 2020. №1(547). S. 4-7.

9. Lenin V.I., Karl Marks. Lenin V.I. Poln. Sobr. soch. T. 26. // Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury. Moskva. 1963.

10. Lenin V.I. Imperializm kak vysshaya stadiya kapitalizma / Lenin V.I. Poln. Sobr. soch. T. 27. // Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury. Moskva. 1963.

11. Liferenko Yu.V. Novyj vzglyad na denezhnye rezervy i ikh rol' v real'noj ehkonomike // Finansy i kredit. 2014. № 37(613). S. 42-53.

12. Marks K. Kapital. T. 1. K. Marks i F. Ehngel's. Soch. T. 23. Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury. – Moskva. 1955

13. Marks K. Kapital. T. III. K. Marks i F. Ehngel's. Soch. T. 25, chast' I. Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury. – Moskva. 1955.

14. Marks K. Kapital. / T. 1. K. Marks i F. Ehngel's. Soch. T. 23. // Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury. Moskva. 1955.

15. Marks K. Kritika Gotskoj programmy. / K. Marks i F. Ehngel's. Soch. T. 19.// Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury. Moskva. 1955.

16. Morozov O.V., Vasil'ev M.A., Biryukov A.G. Strategicheskoe planirovanie v Rossijskoj Federatsii: teoriya, praktika, metodologiya // Vestnik Rossijskogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta im. G.V. Plekhanova. 2019. №6(108). S. 124-148.

17. Nefyodkin V.I., Fadeeva O.P. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo v real'nom izmerenii // EhKO. 2020. №1(547). S. 8-28.

18. Neshitoj A.S., Ivanov M.Yu. Tvorcheskij mezhdistsiplinarnyj podkhod k razvitiyu novogo napravleniya v ehkonomicheskoj teorii (k itogam KhSh mezhdunarodnogo Puschinskogo simpoziuma po ehvolyutsionnoj ehkonomike) // Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2020. №1. S. 169-182.

19. Pavlenko Yu.G. Ehkonomicheskie problemy nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa v issledovaniyakh Instituta ehkonomiki RAN // Vestnik instituta ehkonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2020. № 2. S. 43-59.

20. Piketti T. Kapital v XXI veke // Moskva: Ad Marginem Press, 2016. 592s.

21. Ryazanov S. Poka esche ne pozdno // Argumenty nedeli. 2020. №18(712). 13 maya. S. 3.

22. Sledzevskij I. Tsivilizatsionnoe izmerenie sovremennogo mirovogo razvitiya: problemy i podkhody // MEh i MO. 2020. Tom 64. № 1. S. 82-90.

23. Smorodinskaya N.V., Malygin V.E., Katukov D.D. Rol' ehndogennykh mekhanizmov i faktora slozhnosti v dostizhenii sbalansirovannogo ehkonomicheskogo rosta // Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2020. №1. 2020. S. 113-129.

24. Sukharev A.S. Teoriya disfunktsij: problema upravleniya i utochnenie tselej ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya // Vestnik Instituta ehkonomiki Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2020. № 1. S. 95-112.

25. Khesin E. Ehkonomika Evropejskogo soyuza: itogi postkrizisnogo desyatiletiya // MEh i MO. 2020. Tom 64. № 1.S. 73-81.

26. Ehngel's F. Dialektika prirody / Marks K. i Ehngel's F. Soch. T. 20. // Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury. Moskva. 1955.

27. Yu, Li Kuan. Iz tret'ego mira − v pervyj. Istoriya Singapura (1960-2000) / per. s angl. Aleksandra Bonya. 6-e izd. Gl. 7.// M.: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2018. 576 s.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up