1. Balatskij E.V. Za predelami «ehkonomicheskogo imperializma»: preodolenie slozhnosti // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2012. № 4. S. 138–149.
2. Bredikhin S.V., Kuznetsov A.Yu., Scherbakova N.G. Analiz tsitirovaniya v bibliometrii// Novosibirsk: IVMiMG SO RAN. 2013. S. 267.
3. Vol'chik V.V. Mezhdistsiplinarnost' v ehkonomicheskoj nauke: mezhdu imperializmom i plyuralizmom // Terra Economicus. 2015. T. 13. № 4. S. 52–64.
4. Kobenko Yu.V. Anglijskij v rossijskom obrazovanii: yazyk nauki ili sotsial'noj vertikali? // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014. № 5; URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=14821  (data obrascheniya: 12.01.2017).
5. Kotsemir M.N. Dinamika rossijskoj i mirovoj nauki skvoz' prizmu mezhdunarodnykh publikatsij // Forsajt. 2012. № 1. S. 38–59.
6. Popova N.G., Kuznetsova L.B. Anglijskij v aspiranture XXI veka: a posse ad esse // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2016. № 5. S. 42–49.
7. Benatar S.R. Imperialism, Research Ethics and Global Health // Journal of Medical Ethics. 1998. Vol. 24. No. 4. P. 221–222.
8. Clarke S., Walsh A. Scientific Imperialism and the Proper Relations between the Sciences // International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2009. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 195–207.
9. Crystal D. English as a Global Language. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
10. Dupre J. Against Scientific Imperialism //Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy Science Association, 1994. Vol. 2. P. 274–381.
11. Flower L., Hayes T. A cognitive process. Theory of writing //College Composition and Communication. 1981. Vol. 32. No. 4. P. 365–387.
12. Friedman M. Explanation and Scientific Understanding //Journal of Philosophy. 1974. Vol. 71. No. 1. P. 5–19.
13. Friedman N. L. New Orders and Old: Historians, Educationists, and the Dynamics of Academic Imperialism // The American Behavioral Scientist. 1965. October. P. 24–29.
14. Grabe W., Kaplan R. Theory and Practice of Writing. New York: Longman, 1996.
15. Gross A. G., Harmon J., Reidy M. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article From the 17th Century to the Present. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2002.
16. Hall M.B. The Royal Society’s Role in the Diffusion of Information in the Seventeenth Century // Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London. 1975. Vol. 29. No. 2. P. 173–192.
17. Kitcher P. Explanatory Unification // Philosophy of Science. 1981. Vol. 52. No. 3. P. 507–531.
18. Lewis G. «It’s Academic»: Imperialism and the Australian Tertiary Book Industry //Journal of Media and Cultural Studies. 1990. Vol. 4. No.1. P. 92–108.
19. Maki U. Scientific Imperialism: Difficulties in Definition, Identification and Assessment // International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2013. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 325–339.
20. Philipson R. Linguistic Imperialism and Linguisism. Oxford, 1992. P. 50–57.
21. Prichard C. Challenging Academic Imperialism //Management Communication Quarterly. 2005. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 270–278.
22. Roland M.-C. Quality and integrity in scientific writing: prerequisites for quality in science communication. // Journal of Science Communication. 2009. Vol. 8. No. 2. A04.
23. Sunner J. From Academic Imperialism to the Civil Commons: Institutional Possibilities for Responding to the United Nationa Decade of Education for Sustainable Development // Interchange. 2008. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 77–94.
24. Trompenaars F. Riding the Waves of Culture. London: The Economist Books, 1991.
25. Turdy C. The Role of English in Scientific Communication: Lingua Franca or Tyrannosaurus Rex? // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2004. No. 3. P. 247–269.
26. Turdy C. The Role of English in Scientific Communication: Lingua Franca or Tyrannosaurus Rex? // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2004. No. 3. P. 247–269.
27. Wilmshurst P. Scientific Imperialism: if they won’t benefit from the findings, poor people in the developing world shouldn’t be used in research //Biological Medical Journal. 1997. Vol. 314. P. 840.
28. Wood A. An Examination of the Rhetorical Structures of Authentic Chemistry Text // Applied Linguistics. 1982. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 121–143.
29. Wouters P. The Citation Culture [Thesis]. Amsterdam University, 1999.