Values, institutions, and economic development

The article deals with the problems associated with the formation of a new wave of research in economic development implying certain paradigmatic constraints; the author substantiates the need to move to an intersubjective paradigm.

Economic development is interpreted as a process of mutually conditioned cultural and institutional changes; the features of economic models associated with various combinations of incentive and coercive methods of institutional regulation are revealed.

Keywords

methodology of economics, economic development, neomodernization theory, neoinstitutionalism, constructivism, ideas, values, institutional changes, institutional violence

Received

08.04.2020

Publication date

06.05.2020

Number of characters

53023

Cite

GOST	Biryukov V. Values, institutions, and economic development // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2020. – Issue 4 C. 5-24 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760009149-2-1 (circulation date: 24.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760009149-2
MLA	Biryukov, Vitalij "Values, institutions, and economic development." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 4 (2020):5-24. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760009149-2
APA	Biryukov V. (2020). Values, institutions, and economic development. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (4), pp.5-24 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760009149-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 683

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ventsel' K. Rozhdenie svobody // M.: VTsMOM, 2017.

2. Inglkhart R. Kul'turnaya ehvolyutsiya: kak izmenyayutsya chelovecheskie motivatsii i kak menyaetsya ehtot mir // M.: Mysl', 2018.

3. Munk G. L. Modernization Theory as a Case of Failed Knowledge Production / Annals of Competitive Demonstration. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pr. 37 – 41.

4. Nort D., Uollis Dzh., Vajngast B. Nasilie i sotsial'nye poryadki: Kontseptual'nye ramki dlya interpretatsii pis'mennoj istorii chelovechestva // M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara, 2011.

5. Adzhemoglu D., Robinson Dzh. A. Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye // M.: AST, 2016.

6. Kapelyushnikov R. I. Contra paninstitutsionalizm. Chast' I // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2019. № 7. S.119 – 146.

7. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. Ehkonomicheskoe razvitie kak smena kachestvenno raznykh sistem sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskikh otnoshenij: k kritike «paninstitualizma» i «ideatsionnogo» podkhoda // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2019. № 10. S. 99 – 114.

8. Polterovich V. M. K obschej teorii sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. Chast' 1. Geografiya, instituty ili kul'tura? // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2018. № 11. S. 5 - 26.

9. Boyer P., Petersen M. B. The naturalness of (many) social institutions: Evolved cognition as their foundation // Journal of Institutional Economics. 2012. Vol. 8. No. 1. Pr. 1-25.

10. Efimov V. M. Institutsional'nyj podkhod v ehkonomicheskoj nauke i k ehkonomicheskoj nauke. Chast' I. // Journal of Institutional studies (Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovanij). 2015. Tom 7. № 3. S. 6-40.

11. Louson T. Sovremennaya «ehkonomicheskaya teoriya» v svete realizma // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2006. № 2. S. 75 – 98.

12. Biryukov V. Kul'turologicheskaya paradigma videniya ehkonomicheskoj real'nosti // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2018. № 9. S. 91-101.

13. Panov P. V. Institutsionalizm(y): ob'yasnitel'nye modeli i prichinnost' // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 3. S. 39 – 55.

14. Rodrik D. Kogda idei vazhnee interesov: predpochteniya, vzglyady na mir i innovatsii v ehkonomicheskoj politike // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2015. № 1. S. 22 – 44.

15. O`Khara F. Sovremennye printsipy neortodoksal'noj politicheskoj ehkonomiki // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2009. № 12. S. 38-57.

16. Knyazev Yu. Ob'ektivnyj rynok i sub'ektivnoe tselepolaganie // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2017. № 7. S. 5 – 20.

17. Ehlsner V. Snova ob institutsionalistskoj teorii institutsional'nykh izmenenij: institutsional'naya dikhotomiya v bolee formal'nom predstavlenii // Journal of Institutional Studies (Zhurnal institutsional'nykh issledovanij). 2017. T. 9. № 2. S. 6 - 17.

18. Khabermas Yu. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe dejstvie. SPb.: Nauka, 2001.

19. Shumpeter J. Nauka i ideologiya / Filosofiya ehkonomiki. Antologiya. Pod red. D. Khausmana // M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara, 2012.

20. Shvab K., Dehvis N. Tekhnologii Chetvertoj promyshlennoj revolyutsii // M.: Ehksmo, 2018.

21. Baumol' U. Predprinimatel'stvo: proizvoditel'noe, neproizvoditel'noe i destruktivnoe // Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta. 2013. T. 11. № 2. S. 61 – 84.

22. Teveno L. Mnozhestvennost' sposobov koordinatsii: ravnovesie i ratsional'nost' v slozhnom mire // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 1997. № 10. S. 69 – 84.

23. Biryukov V. Formirovanie kontseptsii ehkonomicheskogo vremeni v usloviyakh smeny nauchnoj paradigmy // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2019. № 5. S. 40–52.

24. Berdyaev N. A. O naznachenii cheloveka // M.: MGU, 1993.

25. McClurg S. D., Lazer D. Political Network // Social Network. Vol. 36. No.1. Pr. 1 – 4.

26. Solov'ev A. I. Gosudarstvennye resheniya: kontseptual'nyj prostor i tupiki teoretizatsii // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 3. S. 127 – 146.

27. Bourdieu P., Wacquant J. An invitation to Reflexive Sociology // Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992.

28. Andrianov V. Blagosostoyanie ne dlya vsekh // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2018. № 1. S. 67 – 95.

29. Edelman Trust Barometer 2020. URL: https:// www.edelman.com/ sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2020-01/2020%20Edelman% 20Trust%20Barometer%20Global%20Report.pdf - Zagl. s ehkrana. – (data obrascheniya 01.02.2020).

30. Khanafi S. Global'naya sotsiologiya: navstrechu novym napravleniyam // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2019. № 8. S. 3 – 7.

31. Tserovich D. M. Institutsional'noe nasilie v vospriyatii naseleniya stran Yugo-Vostochnoj Evropy // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2019. № 5. S. 158 – 163.