All
 
|
 
 


The Position of the Russian Federation Regarding the “Bulldozer Revolution” in Serbia in 2000
 
PIIS013038640023664-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640023664-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Aleksandr Naumov 
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Dmitry Demin
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 4
Pages189-202
Abstract

The authors examine the evolution of Russia's position regarding the “Bulldozer Revolution” in Serbia in 2000. The response of official Moscow to the 'colour revolutions' at the beginning of the twenty-first century is a blank spot in Russian scholarly discourse, and the issue is being analysed in Russian and international historiography for the first time. In the course of the study, the documents of the Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation, the Digital Library of B. Clinton (USA), the Federal Election Commission of Yugoslavia, statements by major Russian politicians and diplomats, materials from leading domestic and Western media, many of which are published for the first time in the academic literature. The authors come to the conclusion that the official reaction of the leadership of the Russian Federation to the crisis events of autumn 2000 in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was cautious and restrained, which excluded open support for one of the parties to the internal political confrontation. While the collective West openly advocated the removal of Slobodan Milošević from power, Russia sought to ensure that the president of the country was elected by the Yugoslav people legally, without foreign interference and internal unrest. That is why, during the elections and before the victory of the “Bulldozer Revolution”, Russian officials and diplomats did not speak out in favour of any candidate, but also did not succumb to the pressure of Western politicians who sought to use Moscow to put pressure on Milošević. Russia attempted to play the role of mediator between the authorities and the opposition, yet in the face of proactive action by Western countries to overthrow the ruling regime, this policy was doomed to failure.

KeywordsYugoslavia, Serbia, colour revolutions, “Bulldozer Revolution”, Slobodan Milošević, Vojislav Koštunica, Zoran Đinđić, Democratic Opposition of Serbia, Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Vladimir Putin, Igor Ivanov, Russia, foreign policy, Breakup of Yugoslavia, USA, NATO, international relations
Received18.04.2023
Publication date31.08.2023
Number of characters38182
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 173

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Antonich S. Pyatoe oktyabrya i perspektivy demokratizatsii Serbii [October fifth and prospects for the democratization of Serbia] // Serbiya o sebe [Serbia about yourself] / ed. M. Jovanovich. Moskva, 2005. S. 255–282. (In Russ.)
2. Ehlikh G. Serbiya: perevorot 2000 goda – shablon dlya “tsvetnykh revolyutsij” [Serbia: Coup of 2000 – template for “color revolutions”] // Ubijstvo demokratii: operatsii TsRU i Pentagona v postsovetskij period. Sbornik statej mezhdunarodnogo avtorskogo kollektiva [Killing Democracy: CIA and Pentagon operations in the Post-Soviet Period. Collection of articles by the international team of authors] / ed. V. Krasheninnikovoj. Moskva, 2014. S. 79–95. (In Russ.)
3. Gornostaev D. Kreml' priznal tsifry Miloshevicha [The Kremlin has acknowledged Milosevic's figures] // Izvestiya. 3.X.2000. S. 6. (In Russ.)
4. Gornostaev D. RF i Zapad sporyat o vyborakh v Kosovo [Russia and the West are arguing about elections in Kosovo] // Izvestiya. 16.IX.2000. P. 6. (In Russ.)
5. Gus'kova E.Yu. Yugoslaviya. Neob’yavlennaya vojna. Agressiya NATO i process mirnogo uregulirovaniya [Yugoslavia. An undeclared war. NATO aggression and the peace settlement process]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2020. (In Russ.)
6. Il'chenkov P. “Ehkspress-revolyutsiya” v Serbii [“Express Revolution” in Serbia] // Oranzhevye seti: ot Belgrada do Bishkeka [Orange networks: from Belgrade to Bishkek]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2008. S. 56–91. (In Russ.)
7. Ivanov I. Vneshnyaya politika Rossii v ehpokhu globalizatsii: stat'i i vystupleniya [Russia's foreign policy in the era of globalization: articles and speeches]. Moskva, 2002. (In Russ.)
8. Latunskij I. Yugoslavskie vojny – groznoe predznamenovanie dlya postsovetskogo mira [The Yugoslav Wars are a terrible omen for the post–Soviet world] // Voenno-politicheskaya analitika [Military-Political analytics]. 24.V.2021. URL: https://vpoanalytics.com/2021/05/24/yugoslavskie-vojny-groznoe-predznamenovanie-dlya-postsovetskogo-mira/  (access date: 10.12.2022). (In Russ.)
9. Martynova M.Yu. Vojna na Balkanah: istoki i realii (1991–1994 gg.) [The War in the Balkans: Origins and Realities (1991–1994)]. Moskva, 1995. (In Russ.)
10. Naumov A.O. “Bul'dozernaya revolyutsiyaˮ v Serbii 2000 goda: tekhnologii smeny politicheskogo rezhima [The “Bulldozer Revolutionˮ in Serbia in 2000: technologies for changing the political regime] // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg University. Ser. 6. Political Science. International relations]. 2016. № 4. S. 119–135. (In Russ.)
11. Nikiforov K.V. Serbiya na Balkanah. XX vek [Serbia in the Balkans. 20 century]. Moskva, 2012. (In Russ.)
12. Romanenko S.A. Yugoslaviya, Rossiya i “slavyanskaya ideyaˮ: vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XXI veka [Yugoslavia, Russia and the “Slavic ideaˮ: The second half of the 19th – the beginning of the 21st century]. Moskva, 2002. (In Russ.)
13. Stepanov G. Serb i molod [Serbian and young] // Izvestiya. 6.X.2000. S. 1. (In Russ.)
14. Sysoev G. Prezident Miloshevich ne mozhet sdvinut'sya s mesta [President Milosevic can't budge] // Kommersant'. 3.X.2000. S. 10. (In Russ.)
15. Sysoev G. Prezident Miloshevich priznal svoe porazhenie [President Milosevic conceded defeat] // Kommersant'. 28.IX.2000. (In Russ.)
16. Sysoev G. Prezident priznal prezidenta. Rossiya stanovitsya na storonu pobeditelej [The President recognized the president. Russia is on the winning side] // Kommersant'. 7.X.2000. (In Russ.)
17. Sysoev G. Vragi Miloshevicha – druz'ya Rossii [Milosevic's enemies are friends of Russia] // Kommersant'. 30.V.2000. (In Russ.)
18. Sysoev G. Zoran Dzhindzhich: Rossiya dolzhna vkladyvat' v demokratov [Zoran Djindjic: Russia should invest in Democrats] // Kommersant'. 31.V.2000. (In Russ.)
19. Timofeev A.Yu. Khronologiya odnogo perevorota. K desyatiletiyu sobytij oktyabrya 2000 g. v Serbii [The chronology of one coup. To the tenth anniversary of the events of October 2000 in Serbia] // Slavyanskij al'manakh [Slavic Almanac]. 2010. Moskva, 2011. S. 161–185. (In Russ.)
20. Yusin M. Samolet Slobodana Miloshevicha v Moskvu ne priletit [Slobodan Milosevic's plane will not arrive in Moscow] // Izvestiya. 3.X.2000. S. 1. (In Russ.)
21. Zamyatina T. Konflikt plokhogo s khudshim. Koshtunitsa gotov ekhat' v Moskvu [The conflict of the bad with the worst. Kostunica is ready to go to Moscow] // Izvestiya. 4.X.2000. P. 2. (In Russ.)
22. Albright M. Madam Secretary: A Memoir. New York, 2003.
23. Birch S. The 2000 Elections in Yugoslavia: The “Bulldozer” Revolution // Electoral Studies. 2002. № 21 (3). P. 499–511.
24. Bujosevic D., Radovanic I. The Fall of Milosevic: The October 5 Revolution. London, 2003.
25. Erlanger S. Serb Police Move into Key Mine as General Strike Looms // The New York Times. 2.X.2000. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/02/world/serb-police-move-into-key-mine-as-general-strike-looms.html?searchResultPosition-2  (access date: 10.12.2022).
26. Lancaster J. U.S. Sidelined as Putin Declines to Help in Yugoslavia // The Washington Post. 5.X.2000. URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2000/10/05/us-sidelined-as-putin-declines-to-help-in-yugoslavia/5013302e-34b6-430f-afda-0b200b9470c1/  (access date: 10.12.2022).
27. LeBor A. Milosevic. A Biography. London, 2004.
28. Marshall T. Shadowplay: Behind the Lines and Under Fire: The Inside Story of Europe’s Last War. London, 2019.
29. Perlez J. U.S. Fears Montenegro May Be Target For Milosevic // The New York Times. 5.VIII.2000. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2000/08/05/world/us-fears-montenegro-may-be-target-for-milosevic.html  (access date: 10.12.2022).
30. Talbott S. The Russia Hand: A Memoir of Presidential Diplomacy. New York, 2002.
31. Vucović S. Serbia: Moderation as a Double-Edged Sword // Arab Spring: Negotiating in the Shadow of the Intifadat / ed. W. Zartman. Athens, 2015. P. 364–391.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up