State and Civil Society in Turkey: Interaction, Submission, Containment (the 2000s and 2010s)

 
PIIS013038640021312-1-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640021312-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 1
Pages164-182
Abstract

The paper explores the development of civil society in Turkey, analyzes the models and mechanisms of its interaction with the state in the context of power consolidation Recep Erdoğan and his Justice and Development Party undertook in the 2000s and 2010s. After long-lasting and eventually unsuccessful attempts of European integration Turkey embarked upon a search for a new balance in the interaction between the state and civil society, characterized by an increase in authoritarian tendencies, Islamization and de-secularization, which still, nevertheless, coexist with a high level of civic activism. The paper seeks to fill a gap in the academic literature on social and political transformations of modern Turkey which primarily focuses on expanding process of Islamization and de-secularization while the issue of specific interaction between the state and civil society institutions in Turkey generally remains beyond the radar of the scholars. The source base of the research includes a wide range of primary materials on the activities of Turkish non-governmental organizations (statutes, press releases, media publications), official government documents and regulations on civil society activities. The paper argues that despite quantitatively significant growth of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Turkey during the 2000s and 2010s most of them have failed to become agents of further Europeanization and political modernization of Turkey. On the contrary, massive financial and institutional support from the government for Turkish NGOs has enhanced the structural fragmentation of Turkish civil society and created large number of influential loyal civil society institutions which were willing to engage with the political regime while the mechanisms of external maintenance of liberal civil society institutions (primarily through the grant programs of European funds) have shown limited efficiency or even failed.

KeywordsTurkey, EU, civil society, Kemalism, Europeanization, Islamization, political modernization, non-governmental organizations, waqfs
Received03.10.2022
Publication date28.02.2023
Number of characters61634
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 153

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Baranovskii V.G., Naumkin V.V. et al. Blizhnij Vostok v menjajushhemsja global'nom kontekste [The Middle East in a changing global context]. Moskva, 2018. (In Russ.)

2. Abdelrahman M.M. Civil Society Exposed: The Politics of NGOs in Egypt. London, 2004.

3. Aknur M. Democratic Consolidation in Turkey: State, Political Parties, Civil Society, Civil-Military Relations, Socio-Economic Development, EU, Rise of Political Islam and Separatist Kurdish Nationalism. Boca Raton, 2012.

4. Altan-Olcay Ö.; İçduygu A. Mapping Civil Society in the Middle East: The Cases of Egypt, Lebanon and Turkey // British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. 2012. Vol. 39. № 2. P. 157–179.

5. Alvarez-Ossorio I. Civil Society and Political Change in Contemporary Egypt // The Arab Spring, Civil Society, and Innovative Activism. New York, 2017. P. 57–80.

6. Baser B., Akgönül S., Öztürk A.E. “Academics for Peace” in Turkey: a case of criminalising dissent and critical thought via counterterrorism policy // Critical Studies on Terrorism. 2017. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 274–296.

7. Bee C., Chrona S. Youth activists and occupygezi: patterns of social change in public policy and in civic and political activism in Turkey // Turkish Studies. 2017. Vol. 18. № 1. P. 157–181.

8. Beller-Hann I., Hann C. Turkish Region: State, Market and Social Identities on the East Black Sea Coast. Oxford, 2001.

9. Buttigieg J.A. The Contemporary Discourse on Civil Society: A Gramscian Critique // Boundary 2. 2005. Vol. 32. № 1. P. 33–52.

10. Cavatorta F., Durac V. Civil Society and Democratization in the Arab World: The dynamics of Activism. Oxford, 2011.

11. Diez T., Agnantopoulos A., Kaliber A. Turkey, Europeanization and Civil Society: Introduction // South European Society and Politics. 2005. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 1–15.

12. Diner Ç., Toktaş Ş. Waves of Feminism in Turkey: Kemalist, Islamist and Kurdish Women’s Movements in an Era of Globalization // Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. 2010. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 41–57.

13. Esim S., Cinoğlu D. Women’s Organizations in 1990s Turkey: Predicaments and Prospects // Middle Eastern Studies. 1999. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 178–188.

14. Hardt M. The Withering of Civil Society // Social Text. 1995. № 45. P. 27–44.

15. Hawthorne A. Middle Eastern Democracy: Is Civil Society the Answer // Carnegie Papers: Middle East Series. 2004. Vol. 44. P. 3–24.

16. Heurlin C. Governing Civil Society: The Political Logic of NGO–State Relations Under Dictatorship // Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 2010. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 220–239.

17. Kalaycıoğlu E. Turkish Dynamics: Bridge Across Troubled Lands. New York, 2005.

18. Kamrava M. The Middle East’s Democracy Deficit in Comparative Perspective // Perspectives on Global Development and Technology. 2007. Vol. 6. P. 189–213.

19. Kubba L. The Awakening of Civil Society // Journal of Democracy. 2000. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 85–86.

20. Kubicek P. Political Conditionality and European Union’s Cultivation of Democracy in Turkey // Democratization. 2011. Vol. 18. № 4. P. 910–931.

21. Kubicek P. The Earthquake, the European Union and Political Reform in Turkey // Mediterranean Politics. 2002. Vol. 7. № 1. P. 1–18.

22. Kubicek P. The European Union and Grassroots Democratization in Turkey // Turkish Studies. 2005. Vol. 6. № 3. P. 361–377.

23. Levitsky S., Way L.A. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York, 2010.

24. Norton A.R. Civil Society in the Middle East. Leiden, 1994.

25. Öktem K. Turkey since 1989: Angry Nation. Nova Scotia, 2011.

26. Plagemann G. Human Rights Organizations: Defending the Particular or the Universal // Civil Society in the Grip of Nationalism. Istanbul, 2000. P. 433–471.

27. Seckinelgin H. Social policy and conflict: the Gezi Park–Taksim demonstrations and uses of social policy for reimagining Turkey // Third World Quarterly. 2016. Vol. 37. № 2. P. 264–280.

28. Şen A.F., Şen Y.F. Online environmental activism in Turkey: The case study of “The Right to Water” // Global Bioethics. 2016. Vol. 27. № 1. P. 1–21.

29. Shlykov P. Non-western model of civil society in the Middle Eastern context: Promises and discontents // Russia in Global Affairs. 2021. Vol. 19. № 2. P. 134–162.

30. Shlykov P. The Secularization and Desecularization Nexus in the Turkish Context: What is behind? // Politics and Religion Journal. 2019. Vol. 13. № 2. P. 199–236.

31. White J.B. Civic Culture and Islam in Urban Turkey // eds C. Hann, E. Dunn. Civil society: challenging western models. London, 1996. P. 143–144.

32. Wiktorowicz Q. Civil Society as Social Control: State Power in Jordan // Comparative Politics. 2000. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 43–61.

33. Yabanci B. Populism as the problem child of democracy: the AKP’s enduring appeal and the use of meso-level actors // Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2016. Vol. 16. № 4. P. 591–617.

34. Yabanci B. Turkey’s tamed civil society: Containment and appropriation under a competitive authoritarian regime // Journal of Civil Society. 2019. Vol. 15. № 4. P. 285–306

35. Yom S. Civil Society and Democratization in the Arab World // Middle East Review of International Affairs. 2005. Vol. 9. № 4. P. 14–33.

36. Zihnioğlu Ö. European Union Civil Society Policy and Turkey: A Bridge Too Far? New York, 2013. P. 50–71.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up