British Project in Palestine: Colonial “National Home”

 
PIIS013038640017183-9-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640017183-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 6
Pages80-92
Abstract

Mandatory Palestine proved to be a unique example of an attempt to create a “national home” within the framework of the colonial system. The present article aims to analyse the combination of the national and the colonial in the implementation of the “home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, as well as the role of cultural-religious narratives in the mindset of both the British administrators and the Zionist settlers. The research is based on British official documents and archive materials, as well as on the memoirs of Jewish settlers in Eretz Yisrael, some of which are introduced into the Russian academic circulation for the first time. Many British politicians viewed the return of the Jews to their historical homeland as a specific noble mission, which fit both into the framework of “Christian Zionism” and the notion of the civilizing nature of imperial colonialism. Palestine, along with its religious and cultural significance, was at the same time playing a thoroughly practical strategic role, and in that sense served as a highly convenient “foothold”. The British politicians and administrators perceived the Zionists as loyal agents of European colonial influence in the Middle East region. Based on the conducted research, the author reached the following conclusions. Even before ethnic confrontation in mandate Palestine intensified, some representatives of the British Empire anticipated that the Jews would not be a loyal minority, always ready to act in the Empire’s interests to the full extent. The main finding of the research is that despite the superficial similarity between the outlooks of the European Zionists and the official representatives of the British Empire, their perceptions of Palestine and their aims and purposes there were fundamentally different. On the one hand, the notions of the leaders of the Zionist movement about Eretz Yisrael were indeed in many respects close to the positions of British politicians and administrators. Jewish nationalism emerged under the influence of European ideas and concepts, and even orientalism influenced it to a certain degree. On the other hand, the Zionists perceived the Europeans as situational allies, therefore their interests coincided only in the short-term perspective. The idea of the national revival of the people of Israel in its historical homeland played a key role for them. This laid the foundation of the new Jewish identity, which also included multiple elements of religious traditions and legal bases of Judaism.

Keywordsmandated territories, Palestine, British colonial empire, colonial system, orientalism, Zionism, nationalism, the Jews, nation-state building
Received07.05.2021
Publication date19.10.2021
Number of characters31793
Cite  
1 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 597

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Epstein A.D., Kozheurov S.A, Fadeev I.A. Poslednee gosudarstvo krestonoscev: britanskoe mandatnoe pravlenie v Palestine v zerkale zarubezhnoj istoriografii [The last state of the crusaders: British mandate rule in Palestine in the mirror of foreign historiography] // Ural'skoe vostokovedenie [Ural Survey of Oriental Studies]. 2011. № 4. S. 162–180. (In Russ.)

2. Iaari A. Strana Izrailia v pis'makh i vospominaniiakh XVII–XX vekov: v 2-h t. / perevod s ivrita G. Maizel'; pod red. I. Lur'e, pri uchastii L. Trembovler-Amir, Kh.-B. Korzakovoi. T. 2. [The Land of Israel in letters and memoirs 17th–20th centuries: in 2-x vol. / translated from Hebrew by G. Maizel; eds I. Lurie, with L. Trembovler-Amir, Kh.-B. Korzakova participating. Vol. 2]. Moskva, 2018. (In Russ.)

3. Izrail': novoe gosudarstvo – novaia natsiia. Glava 7 [Israel: a new state – a new nation. Ch. 7] // Blizhnii Vostok: politika i identichnost' / pod red. I.D. Zviagel'skoi [The Middle East: politics and identity / ed. I.D. Zvyagelskaya]. Moskva, 2020. S. 111–125. (In Russ.)

4. Krupin S.V. Protivostojanie arabskogo i evrejskogo naselenija v Palestine: dominirovanie nasilija i mezhdunarodnyj kontekst (pervaja polovina XX veka) [Conflicts of the Arab and Jewish population in the first half of the 20th century: the domination of violence and the international context] // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Izvestiya of Saratov University. History. International Relations]. 2019. Vol. 19. № 2. S. 214–218. (In Russ.)

5. Sagimbaev A.V. Kolonial'naia politika Velikobritanii v mezhvoennyi period: prichiny i osobennosti transformatsii [Colonial policy of Great Britain in the interwar period: the causes and features of transformation]. Moskva, 2018. (In Russ.)

6. Shapovalov M.S. Britanskie ekonomicheskie interesy v Palestine v kontse XIX – nachale XX v. [British economic interests in Palestine in the late 19th – early 20th centuries] // Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost' [East. Afro-Asian societies: history and moder-nity]. 2014. № 6. S. 89–98. (In Russ.)

7. Shchevelev S.S., Kryzhko E.V. Problema zaseleniya Palestiny evrejskim naseleniem v pervoj polovine XX v. i obrazovaniya Gosudarstva Izrail' [The problem of relocation by the Jewish populatiob to Palestine in the first half of the 20th century and the creation of the State of Israel] // Uch. zap. Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo. Seriya “Istoricheskie nauki” [Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Historical science]. Vol. 6 (72). № 1. S. 143–156. (In Russ.)

8. Antonius G. The Arab Awakening. The Story of the Arab National Movement. Philadelphia, 1939.

9. Azoury N. Le Réveil de la Nation Arabe dans l’Asie Turque. Paris, 1905.

10. Berlin I. The Origins of Israel // The Middle East in Transition / ed. W.Z. Laqueur. New York, 1958. P. 204–221.

11. Browne B.C. Disrupting Settler-Colonialism or Enforcing the Liberal “Peaceˮ? Transitional (In)justice in Palestine-Israel // Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies. 2021. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 1–27.

12. Essaid A.A. Zionism and Land Tenure in Mandate Palestine. Abingdon, 2014.

13. Fieldhouse D.K. Western Imperialism in the Middle East 1914–1958. Oxford, 2006.

14. Gelber Y. Is Zionism Colonialism? // The British Mandate in Palestine. A Centenary Volume, 1920–2020 / ed. M.J. Cohen. Abingdon, 2020. P. 221–234.

15. Gerber H. Zionism, Orientalism, and the Palestinians // Journal of Palestine Studies. 2003. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 23–41.

16. Hogan A. Competing Administrations in Palestine: Imperial Power and Settler Regimes in the British Empire // Journal of Holy Land and Palestine Studies. 2020. Vol. 19. № 2. P. 191–209.

17. Jacobson A., Naor M. Oriental Neighbors: Middle Eastern Jews and Arabs in Mandatory Palestine. Waltham, 2017.

18. Jazeel T. Postcolonialism. Oxon, 2019.

19. Johnson R. British Imperialism. Basingstoke, 2003.

20. Laqueur W. A History of Zionism. From the French Revolution to the Establishment of the State of Israel. New York, 2003.

21. Makover R. Shilton u-minhal be-Eretz-Yisrael 1917–1925 [Government and administration of Palestine 1917–1925] Yerushalaim, 1988. (In Hebrew)

22. Mandate for Palestine – League of Nations 15th session – Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission. 19 July 1929. HTML: https://unispal.un.org/DPA/DPR/unispal.nsf/0/0BCA96A75252EC7B052565F0004E57C4 (access date: 01.05.2021).

23. Masalha N. The Zionist Bible: Biblical Precedent, Colonialism and the Erasure of Memory. Abingdon, 2014.

24. Melamed E. Peninei Halakhah, Shabbat. Chapter 9:12. HTML: https://www.sefaria.org/Peninei_Halakhah%2C_Shabbat.9.12.5?ven-Peninei_Halakhah,_English_ed._Yeshivat_Har_Bracha&lang-bi&with-Shulchan%20Arukh,%20Orach%20Chayim&lang2-en (access date: 01.05.2021).

25. Memoirs: David Ben-Gurion / compiled by Th.R. Branstein. Cleveland, 1970.

26. Mendel Y., Ranta R. From the Arab Other to the Israeli Self: Palestinian Culture in the Making of Israeli National Identity. Abingdon, 2016.

27. Palestine Mandate. Volume 50: debated on Wednesday 21 June 1922. HTML: https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/1922-06-21/debates/4a00f5d1-4cca-41fd-8d0b-2ab961c1e70e/PalestineMandate (access date: 01.05.2021).

28. Palestine Papers 1917–1922. Seeds of Conflict / compiled and annotated by D. Ingrams. London, 1972.

29. Palestine. Correspondence with the Palestine Arab Delegation and the Zionist Organisation. London, 1922.

30. Peleg Y. Orientalism and the Hebrew Imagination. Ithaca, 2005.

31. Penslar D.J. Is Zionism a Colonial Movement? // Colonialism and the Jews / eds E.B. Katz, L.M. Leff, M.S. Mandel. Bloomington, 2017. P. 275–300.

32. Reuveni Y. Mimshal ha-mandat be-E”I 1920–1948: Nituakh histori-medini [The Administration of Palestine under the British Mandate 1920–1948: An Institutional Analysis] Ramat Gan, 1993. (In Hebrew)

33. Said E.W. Orientalism. New York, 1979.

34. Samman M. Trans-Colonial Urban Space in Palestine: Politics and Development. Abingdon, 2013.

35. Samuel H. An Interim Report of the Civil Administration of Palestine, during the period 1st July, 1920–30th June, 1921. 30 July 1921. HTML: https://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/349B02280A930813052565E90048ED1C (access date: 01.05.2021).

36. Sanbar E. The Invention of the Holy Land // A History of Jewish-Muslim Relations: From the Origins to the Present Day / eds A. Meddeb, B. Stora; translated from French by J.M. Todd, M.B. Smith. Princeton, 2013. P. 292–296.

37. Schmidt D.W. Partners Together in this Great Enterprise: The Role of Christian Zionism in the Foreign Policies of Britain and America in the XX Century. Jerusalem, 2011.

38. Storrs R. The Memoirs of Sir Ronald Storrs. New York, 1937.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up