European Museums, a Look from the USSR and the Limits of Transnationality in the Mid-1920th

 
PIIS013038640012693-0-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640012693-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 6
Pages78-92
Abstract

The article, in the conceptual framework proposed by transnational history as a methodological approach, analyzes materials related to the reception of Western European museums by Soviet museum workers of the 1920th. The objects of analysis are the reports of O. F. Waldhauer and A. A. Pochinkov on innovations in museum work in Germany and Italy, which were made at a meeting of the Museum section of the State Institute of Art History (Leningrad) in 1925. Based on the idea of the importance of the «close inspections of the “Other”» mechanism for the realization of “links and flows” of transnational history, the author shows what the authors of the reports under review saw exactly. Contextualization of the material in the situation of Soviet museum field in the mid-1920th suggests that their view was largely selective. One of its main tasks was to legitimize their own searches and approaches, which needed support in the face of the state authorities and part of the professional community. No less important was the perception of what was seen as a place of memory, referring to memories and partially compensating for the loss / absence of social capital in the present. The author comes to the conclusion that the "gaze" directed from Soviet Russia at European museums was largely determined by the task of ensuring the interests of the viewer himself. The selectivity of what was seen, which probably had an implicit character and was not always realized by the "observers "themselves, corrected the final"connections and flows". The sensitive component of "peering" was also important, which actualized the emotions and memories of the viewer, bringing to the fore the potential of what was seen as a kind of place of memory. The transformations associated with the process of reception and recoding should be taken into account when analyzing the transnational dimension of any historical phenomenon, including Museum business.

KeywordsTransnational history, museum, Institute of Art History, O. F. Waldhauer, A. A. Pochinkov
AcknowledgmentThe work was supported by the Russian science Foundation; grant № 18-18-00367 "General history in the system of Soviet science, culture and education in 1917-1947".
Received08.09.2020
Publication date07.12.2020
Number of characters48221
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 586

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alekseev A. Yu. Ehllino-skifskoe otdelenie i vystavka 1927 goda // Antichnoe iskusstvo v sovetskom muzeevedenii. L., 1986. S. 59‒66.

2. Belyaev N. S. Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Pochinkov (1877–1955) i ego vklad v razvitie kul'turnoj zhizni Peterburga-Leningrada pervoj poloviny KhKh veka // Pochinkov A. A. Nauchnye raboty. Vospominaniya. Stikhotvoreniya. SPb., 2006. S. 5-15.

3. Zubov V. P. Stradnye gody Rossii. M., 2004.

4. Ismagulova T. D. Pochemu zhe vse-taki «v Ehrmitazhe Pavlovskoj statue oblomali ruki»? (graf Valentin Platonovich Zubov i dvortsovo-parkovyj ansambl' Pavlovska v 1920-e gg.) // Pavlovskie chteniya. Materialy V i VI nauchnykh konferentsij. Pavlovsk. 2003. S. 134‒145.

5. Kyzlasova I. L. Istoriya otechestvennoj nauki ob iskusstve Vizantii i Drevnej Rusi. 1920–1930-e gody. Po materialam arkhivov. M., 2000.

6. Legran B. V. Sotsialisticheskaya rekonstruktsiya Ehrmitazha. L., 1934.

7. Lotman Yu. M. K postroeniyu teorii vzaimodejstviya kul'tur // Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. SPb., 2010. S. 603-614.

8. Mavleev E. V. Val'dgauer. SPb., 2005.

9. Mavleev E. V. Nauchnaya i ehkspozitsionnaya deyatel'nost' O. F. Val'dgauera (opyt tvorcheskogo portreta) // Antichnoe iskusstvo v sovetskom muzeevedenii. L., 1986. S. 35-58.

10. Pochinkov A. A. Puteshestviya po Italii // Pochinkov A. A. Nauchnye raboty. Vospominaniya. Stikhotvoreniya. SPb., 2006. S. 87-96.

11. Rossijskij institut istorii iskusstv v memuarakh. SPb., 2003.

12. Capanzha O. S. Osnovy muzejnoj kommunikatsii. SPb., 2007.

13. Solomakha E. Yu. Prodazhi kartin iz Ehrmitazha na evropejskikh auktsionakh v 1928–1935 gg. // Muzej. Pamyatnik. Nasledie. 2019. № 1 (5). S. 41-60.

14. Farmakovskij M. V. Tekhnika ehkspozitsii v istoriko-bytovykh muzeyakh. L., 1928.

15. Bennett T. The Birth of the Museum: history, theory, politics. London - New York, 1995.

16. Curran K. The Invention of the American Art Museum. From Craft to Kulturgeschichte, 1870–1930. Los Angeles, 2016.

17. Duncan C. Civilizing Rituals: Inside Public Art Museums. London - New York, 1995.

18. Gerasimov I., Glebov S., Mogilner M. Hybridity: Marrism and the Problems of Language of the Imperial Situation // Ab Imperio: Iccledovaniya po novoj impepckoj ictopii i natsionalizmu v poctcovetckom ppoctpanctve. 2016. № 1. R. 27-68.

19. Meyer A., Savoy B. Towards a Transnational History of Museums. An Introduction // The Museum is Open. Towards a Transnational History of Museums 1750–1940 / Eds. A. Meyer, B. Savoy. Berlin - Boston, 2014. R. 9-11.

20. National Museums. New Studies from around the World / Eds. S. J. Knell, P. Aronsson, A. Bugge Amundsen, A. J. Barnes, S. Burch, J. Carter, V. Gosselin, S. A. Hughes, A. Kirwan. London-New York, 2011.

21. The Palgrave Dictionary of Transnational History / Eds. A. Iriye, P.-Y. Saunier. Houndmillse, 2009.

22. Treasures Into Tractors: The Selling of Russia's Cultural Heritage, 1918-1938. Eds. A. Odom, W.R. Salmond. Washington (DC), 2009.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up