Frustrated Alliance: The United States and the Pacific Pact, 1949-1951

 
PIIS013038640008191-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640008191-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 1
Pages127-146
Abstract

An important component of the United States’ foreign policy after World War II was the creation of regional security arrangements in many parts of the world. Much has been written about the establishment of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as a key element in the U.S. strategy of containment of the Soviet power during the Cold War. But why was there no NATO in the East Asia? This paper examines the rise and fall of the initiative to create a Pacific Pact in 1949-1951. It was originally proposed by President E. Quirino of the Philiphines as a military alliance of all anti-Communist Asian countries headed by the USA. The United States at first expressed disinterest in the Pacific pact proposals fearing the participation of South Korea and Taiwan but later offered its own plan, which than had been rejected. This analysis reveals that US policymakers were not in fact unwilling to form a multilateral military alliance in the Pacific until at least the early 1950s. An examination of why American Pacific pact proposal failed helps clarify the origins of the several security treaties which than shaped so-called San Francisco System. This paper also explains why the final postwar U.S. security arrangements in the Asia- Pacific region did not take a NATO-type multilateral alliance form.

KeywordsPacific Pact, Cold War, U. S. foreign policy, Asia-Pacific region, E. Quirino, J. F. Dulles
Received13.03.2020
Publication date13.03.2020
Number of characters63599
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 932

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Vorontsov V. B. Tikhookeanskaya politika SShA 1941—1950. M., 1967.

2. Istoriya diplomatii. T. 3. Diplomatiya na pervom ehtape obschego krizisa kapitalisticheskoj sistemy. Pod red. A. A. Gromyko i dr., izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. M., 1965.

3. Levtonova Yu. O. Istoriya Filippin. Kratkij ocherk. M., 1979.

4. Malakhovskij K. V. Istoriya Avstralii. M., 1980.

5. Molodyakov V. Eh, Molodyakova Eh. V., Markar'yan S. B. Istoriya Yaponii. KhKh vek. M., 2007. Utkin A. I. SShA Yaponiya: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. M., 1990.

6. Acharya A. Why Is There No NATO in Asia? The Normative Origins of Asian Multilateralism. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. Working Paper № 05-05. p. 1-54. - https://wcfia.harvard. edu/files/wcfia/files/1049_why_no_asian_nato_final.pdf (data obrascheniya 25.10.2019).

7. Barclay G. St. J. Australia Looks to America: The Wartime Relationship, 1939-1942. — Pacific Historical Review, 1977, № 3, r. 251-271.

8. Buszynski Leszek. SEATO: The Failure of an Alliance Strategy. Singapore, 1983.

9. Calder K. E. Pacific Defense: Arms, Energy, and America’s Future in Asia. New York, 1996.

10. Cha V. D. Power-play: Origins of the U. S. Alliance System in Asia. - International Security, 2009/10, № 3, p. 158-196.

11. Crabb Cecil. The Elephants and the Grass: A Study of Non-Alignment. New York, 1967.

12. Dulles John Foster. War or Peace. New York, 1950.

13. Gaddis John L. The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War. New York, 1987.

14. Hemmer Ch., Peter J. Katzenstein. Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism. - International Organization, Summer 2002, p. 575-607.

15. Hogan Ashley. Moving in Open Daylight: Doc Evatt, an Australian at the United Nations. Sydney, 2008.

16. Junghyun Park. Frustrated Alignment! The Pacific Pact Proposals from 1949 to 1954 and South Korea-Taiwan Relations. - International Journal of Asian Studies, 2015, № 2, p. 217-238.

17. Kai He Huiyun Feng. Why is there no NATO in Asia? Revisited: Prospect Theory, Balance of Threat, and US Alliance Strategies. - European Journal of International Relations, June 2012, p. 227-250.

18. Kelly Andrew. ANZUS and the Early Cold War: Strategy and Diplomacy between Australia, New Zealand and the United States, 1945-1956. Cambridge (UK), 2018.

19. Kennan George F. Memoirs, 1950-1963. New York, 1972.

20. Mabon D. W. Elusive Agreements: The Pacific Pact Proposals of 1949-1951. - Pacific Historical Review, May 1988, p. 147-177.

21. McIntyre W. David. Background to the ANZUS Pact: Policy-Making, Strategy and Diplomacy, 1945-55. New York, 1995.

22. Meyer Milton W. A Diplomatic History of the Philippine Republic. Hawaii, 1965.

23. Nester W. R. The Reverse Course, 1947-1952. - Power across the Pacific: A Diplomatic History of American Relations with Japan. London, 1996, p. 224-260.

24. Oliver Robert T. Syngman Rhee and American Involvement in Korea, 1942-1960: A Personal Narrative. Seoul, 1978.

25. Ovendale R. Britain and the Cold War in Asia. - The Foreign Policy of the British Labour Governments, 1945-1951. Ed. by Ritchie Ovendale. Leicester, 1984.

26. Ovendale R. The English - Speaking Alliance: Britain, the United States, the Dominions and the Cold War, 1945-1951. London, 1985.

27. Press-Barnathan G. Organizing the World: The United States and Regional Cooperation in Asia and Europe (Studies in International Relations), 1st Edition. New York, 2003.

28. Schonberger H. B. Aftermath of War: Americans and the Remaking of Japan, 1945-1952. Kent (Ohio), 1989.

29. Thompson S. The United States and Southeast Asian Regionalism: Collective Security and Economic Development, 1945-1975. New York, 2019.

30. Walt S. M. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, 1987.

31. Welfield J. An Empire in Eclipse: Japan in the Postwar American Alliance System. London, 1988.

32. Zhihua Sh. Sino-Soviet Relations and the Origins of the Korean War: Stalin’s Strategic Goals in the Far East. - Journal of Cold War Studies, 2000, № 2, p. 45-51.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up