All
 
|
 
 


Legacy of the War of 1846—1848 in U.S.—Mexico Relations throughout the Mexican Revolution
 
PIIS013038640003817-6-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640003817-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Alexey Manukhin 
Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation: Institute for Latin American Studies, RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 1
Pages213-222
Abstract

The article examines the impact which the experience of the Mexican war (1846—1848) had on U.S. policy towards Mexico throughout the Revolution, 1910—1917. Great attention is given to psychological stereotypes coming from mid-19th century that had undergone some evolution. It is concluded that a new model of U.S. domineering was established, as compared to the earlier era of conflict.

Keywordsthe United States, Mexico, war, politics, revolution, diplomacy, expansion
Received07.02.2019
Publication date07.02.2019
Number of characters37563
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1534

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Al'perovich M. S., Slezkin L. Yu. Obrazovanie nezavisimykh gosudarstv v Latinskoj Amerike. M., 1966, s. 180.
2. Zorrilla L. G. Historia de las relaciones entre Mexico y los Estados Unidos de America, 1800—1958, t. 1. Mexico, 1965, p. 498—507.
3. Coerver D. M., Hall L. B. Texas and the Mexican Revolution, 1910—1920: A Study in National and State Border Policy. San Antonio, 1984, p. 11—12.
4. Raat D. W. “Revoltosos”. Mexico’s Rebels in the United States, 1903—1923. College Station, 1983, p. 175—199.
5. William Howard Taft Papers (dalee: WHTP), case files, 1904—1913. Microform. Washington (D.C.), 1972, series 6, file 229, p. 30229—30330.
6. Scholes W. V., Scholes M. V. The Foreign Policies of the Taft Administration. Columbia (Minnesota), 1970, p. 90.
7. Noskov V. V. Instituty vlasti i vneshnyaya politika SShA (1901—1913 gg.). SPb., 1993, s. 350.
8. Challener R. Admirals, Generals and American Foreign Policy, 1898—1914. Princeton, 1973, p. 346.
9. Carter W. H. Our Army in San Antonio. — Outlook, v. 99, 1911, p. 972–979.
10. Langley L. D. The Banana Wars: the United States and Intervention in the Caribbean, 1898—1934. Lexington, 1986, p. 105.
11. Wilson W. A History of the American People, v. 2. New York — London, 1902, p. 122.
12. Smith J. H. The American Attitude in the Eve on the War. — The Mexican War: Crisis for American Democracy. Lexington, 1969, p. 10.
13. Harvey G. We Appeal to the President: to Save the Country, to the Save the Pty, to Save Himself. — North American Review, v. 199, 1914, p. 99—101.
14. Connor S. V., Faulk O. B. North America Divided: the Mexican War, 1846—1848. New York, 1971, p. 138—140.
15. Usher R. The Real Mexican Problem. — North American Review, v. 200, 1914, p. 45—52.
16. Min'yar-Beloruchev K. V. SShA v vojne s Meksikoj (1846—1848 gg.): armiya, polkovodtsy, politiki. — Vestnik  Voennogo universiteta, 2010, № 2 (22), s. 59.
17. Collins J. R. Sectionalism and Political Fragmentation. — The Mexican War: Changing Interpretations. Chicago, 1973, p. 70.
18. Sweetman J. The Landing at Vera Cruz. Annapolis, 1968, p. 83.
19. Johannsen R. W. To the Hall of the Montezumas: the Mexican War in the American Imagination. New York and Oxford, 1985, p. 78—79.
20. Lutzker M. A. Can the Peace Movement Prevent War? The U.S. — Mexico Crisis of 1914. — Doves and Diplomats: Foreign Offices and Peace Movements in Europe and America in the 20th Century. Westport — London, 1978, p. 140—142.
21. Ulloa B. La Revolucion interventida: relaciones diplomaticas entre Mexico y los Estados Unidos, 1910—1914. Mexico, 1971, p. 188.
22. Finnegan J. P. Against the Specter of a Dragon: the Campaign for American Military Preparedness, 1914—1917. Westport and London, 1974, p. 154—156.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up