Model of rank recognition reflection of the enemy in the tasks of countering

Basic mathematical decision models based on the decision of some tasks of optimization in the assumption of rationality of participants. Actors seek to anticipate the opponent's choice of interaction and choose the best response to it. Within mathematical logic, this task is a task recognition with presence of classifying signs to determine the rank of the reflection of participants during the conflict. In this paper, we consider a mathematical model based on apparatus of mathematical logic for determining the rank of reflection of the enemy in the tasks of countering.

Keywords

mathematical model, mathematical logic, objective recognition, classification task, necessary conditions, sufficient conditions, reflective analysis, rank of reflection

Received

26.09.2018

Publication date

04.10.2018

Number of characters

629

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Karjukin V., Chausov F. Model of rank recognition reflection of the enemy in the tasks of countering // Matematicheskoe modelirovanie – 2018. – V. 30. – Number 8 C. 89-106 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/mmod/s207987840000202-1-2-en (circulation date: 04.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023408790001176-7
MLA	Karjukin, V., Chausov, F. "Model of rank recognition reflection of the enemy in the tasks of countering." Matematicheskoe modelirovanie 30.8 (2018):89-106. DOI: 10.31857/S023408790001176-7
APA	Karjukin V., Chausov F. (2018). Model of rank recognition reflection of the enemy in the tasks of countering. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie 30(8), pp.89-106 DOI: 10.31857/S023408790001176-7

Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Matematicheskie metody raspoznavaniia obrazov. Doklady 9-i Vserossiiskoi konferentsii. – M.: RAN, 1999, 271 s.

2. A.L. Gorelik, V.A. Skripnik. Metody raspoznovaniia. Uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Vysshaia shkola, 1977, 303 s.

3. F.S. Chausov. Refleksivnyi podkhod v upravlencheskoi deiatelnosti. – SPb.: SPbVMPi, 2008, 286 s.

4. V.A. Lefevr, G.L. Smolian. Algebra konflikta. – M.: Znanie, 1968 s.

5. D.A. Novikov, A.G. Chkhartishvili. Refleksivnyi igry. – M. SINTEG, 2003, 203 s.

6. T.A. Taran. Otobrazhenie printsipov refleksivnogo upravleniia v modeliakh refleksivnogo vybora // Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie, 2002, t.2, №1, s.104-118.

7. Iu.B. Germeier. Igry s neprotivopolozhnimi interesami. – M.: Nauka, 1976, 327 s.

8. V.V. Kariukin, F.S. Chausov. Refleksivnye aspekty matematicheskikh modelei priniatiia reshenii // Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie. Sb. Mater. IX Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma “Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie”, 2013, t.13, №1-2, s.70-73.

9. V.V. Kariukin, F.S. Chausov. Refleksivnyi analiz bimatrichnykh igr kak reshenie zadachi vybora v modeliach protivodeistviia // Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie, 2010, t.10, №1-2, s.80-92.

10. V.V. Kariukin, F.S. Chausov. Aksiomaticheskii podkhod k obosnovaniiu algoritma priniatiia resheniia v probleme refleksivnogo vybora // Refleksivnye protsessy i upravlenie. Sb. Mater. X Mezhd. simpoziuma, 2015, t.15, №1-2, s. 48-52.

11. G. Gamov, M. Stern. Puzzle Math. – N.Y.: Viking Press, 1958.

12. V.I. Danilov. Lektsii po teorii igr. – M.: Rossiiskaia ekonomich. shkola, 2002, 140 s.