FORMS OF STATE PARTICIPATION IN CIVIL TURNOVER: THE EXPERIENCE OF RUSSIA, KAZAKHSTAN AND CHINA

 
PIIS160565900026531-8-1
DOI10.12737/S160565900026531-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Process
Affiliation: Siberian Institute of Management - branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Address: Novosibirsk, 630091, Novosibirsk, Derzhavin street, 14, apt. 50
Occupation: associate of professor of Siberian Institute of Management - branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Affiliation: Siberian Institute of Management - branch of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Address: Russia, Novosibirsk, 2-ая Обская, дом 154, квартира 1594
Journal nameJournal of Russian Law
Edition
Abstract

The state becomes an active participant in civil turnover both in Russia and abroad, becoming involved in solving public tasks and providing common benefits by establishing legal entities. Unitary forms of legal entities, previously popular in the field of public property management, have faded into the background compared to corporate entities with state participation, the effectiveness and expediency of which is ambiguous. The question is raised about the formation of general trends in the legal regulation of the mechanism and forms of state participation in civil turnover both in Russia and abroad.

With the help of the formal legal method of studying the norms of legislation and doctrine, the mechanisms and forms of the state's inclusion in civil circulation and the realization of property rights by it are compared. The participation of the state in civil legal relations is investigated indirectly or by special order, excluding the direct participation of state bodies in civil turnover. Special attention is paid to the statuses of state corporations and companies, public law companies that occupy a special place in the mechanism of solving state tasks and, as a rule, do not have economic efficiency.

The analysis of the legislation and practice of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the People's Republic of China as countries with a peculiar approach to regulating the participation of the state in ensuring public interests through the stimulation of private participants in the turnover and the introduction of special forms of organizations is presented. Commercial and non-commercial joint-stock companies are compared, the prospects of introducing such a form of organizations as social and entrepreneurial corporations are evaluated.

The absence of a system of organizational and legal forms of legal entities that meets the modern needs of the state and society and fully ensure the effective management of public property for solving state tasks is substantiated. The prospect of reforming the legal regulation of state participation in the activities of corporations is determined.

Keywordscivil turnover, unitary enterprises, public law companies, social and entrepreneurial corporations, non-profit joint stock company
Acknowledgmentauthors' means
Received05.08.2023
Publication date24.04.2024
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

views: 1

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alekseenko, A. P. Harakternye cherty Grazhdanskogo kodeksa KNR // Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava. - 2021. - №12 (133). [Elektronnyj resurs] URL: >>>> (data obrashcheniya: 20.06.2023).

2. Bazarov, V. B. Publichnye yuridicheskie lica [monografiya] / V. B. Bazarov / nauch. red. L. V. Kuras. – Irkutsk: Izd-vo «Ottisk», 2019. – 160 s.

3. Van Hajczyun'. Zakon «Obshchaya chast' grazhdanskogo prava KNR» i razvitie grazhdanskogo prava Kitaya / Hajczyun' Van // Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya 14. Pravo. - 2018. - №3. [Elektronnyj resurs] URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zakon-obschaya-chast-grazhdanskogo-prava-knr-i-razvitie-grazhdanskogo-prava-kitaya (data obrashcheniya: 20.06.2023).

4. Gutnikov, O.V. Gosudarstvennye organizacii kak sub"ekty korporativnyh otnoshenij: o dopustimosti uchastiya v korporativnyh otnosheniyah unitarnyh yuridicheskih lic // ZHurnal rossijskogo prava. - 2016. - № 7. - S. 44 – 52.

5. Erbahaev, E. A. Novye Osnovnye polozheniya grazhdanskogo prava Kitajskoj Narodnoj Respubliki // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. - 2019. - T. 10. - Vyp. 2. - S. 390—403. URL: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.213 (data obrashcheniya: 20.06.2023).

6. Kirillova, E.A. Formy uchastiya gosudarstva v grazhdanskih pravootnosheniyah / E.A. Kirillova, P.V. Artemova // Social'no-politicheskie nauki. - 2018. - №4. - URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/formy-uchastiya-gosudarstva-v-grazhdanskih-pravootnosheniyah (data obrashcheniya: 26.06.2023).

7. Klimkin, S.I. Osobennosti pravovogo polozheniya nekommercheskih akcionernyh obshchestv /S.I. Klimkin// https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=37732805&pos=6;-108#pos=6;- (data obrashcheniya: 20.06.2023).

8. Kozlova, N.V. Pravosub"ektnost' yuridicheskogo lica. M.: Statut, 2005. – 476 s.

9. Kuznecov, S. Kategoriya «YUridicheskoe lico publichnogo prava» v Rossijskoj yurisprudencii /S. Kuznecov// Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. - 2014. - №6 (92). [Elektronnyj resurs] URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kategoriya-yuridicheskoe-litso-publichnogo-prava-v-rossiyskoy-yurisprudentsii (data obrashcheniya: 20.06.2023)

10. Kurbatov, A.YA. O yuridicheskih licah publichnogo prava / A.YA. Kurbatov // Hozyajstvo i pravo. – 2009. – № 10. – S. 77–85.

11. Manukiyan E. Pribyl' kompanij s gosuchastiem v 2022 godu upala sil'nee, chem u chastnyh // Ros. gazeta. – 2023. – 10 maya.

12. Meshcheryakova, A.A. Osobennosti pravovogo polozheniya yuridicheskih lic Kitaya /A.A. Meshcheryakova // Vestnik CHitGU. – 2011. - №2. – S. 55-59.

13. Sulejmenov, M.K. Modernizaciya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva Respubliki Kazahstan [Elektronnyj resurs] URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=37103691&pos=3;-45#pos=3;- 5&sdoc_params=text%3D%25D0%25BC%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B4%25D0%25B5%25D (data obrashcheniya: 24.06.2023).

14. Suhanov, E. A. O grazhdanskoj pravosub"ektnosti gosudarstvennyh yuridicheskih lic / E. A. Suhanov // ZHurnal rossijskogo prava. – 2018. – № 1(253). – S. 5-15. – DOI 10.12737/art_2018_1_1. – EDN YKWEXA.

15. Timoshenko, V. Publichno-pravovye kompanii – zakat ery goskorporacij? /V. Timoshenko // Garant.ru. – 2016. - 30 sent. URL: https://www.garant.ru/article/930588/ (data obrashcheniya: 24.06.2023)

16. Uskov O.YU. YUridicheskie lica publichnogo prava: ponyatie i vidy // ZHurnal rossijskogo prava. - 2010. - №6 (162). [Elektronnyj resurs] URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/yuridicheskie-litsa-publichnogo-prava-ponyatie-i-vidy (data obrashcheniya: 20.06.2023)

17. CHirkin, V. E. YUridicheskoe lico publichnogo prava / V.E. CHirkin / Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN. - Moskva: NORMA, 2007. - 352 s.

18. SHershenevich, G.F. Izbrannoe. T. 5: Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava / Vstup. slovo, sost.: P.V. Krasheninnikov. – M.: Statut, 2017. – 832 s.

19. YAkovlev, V.F. O Koncepcii razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva Rossijskoj Federacii /V.F. YAkovlev//Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo suda Rossijskoj Federacii. - 2009. - № 11. - S. 6-7.

20. YAstrebov, O. A. YUridicheskoe lico publichnogo prava. Voprosy teorii / O. A. YAstrebov; – Moskva: Nauka, 2010. – ISBN 978-5-02-037629-8. – EDN QRRSDD

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up