Fractals in structure of a legal and administrative discourse

Features of the sociopolitical argument in the conditions of an administrative management style are considered. It is shown, that in this case the argument role grows with the aggravation of administrative problems, when preservation of stability of normative system as a whole demands local infringements of some norms. The hypothesis is stated, that the mechanism of management realised in Russia mismatches features of national culture. Recursive character of an administrative discourse is underlined. Analogies are made with the features of legal argumentation, considered in the works of D. Kennedy and J. Balkin.

Keywords

scheme of argumentation, normative system, management errors, counterargument, national character, recursion, fractal

Received

16.10.2019

Publication date

02.12.2019

Number of characters

25480

Cite

GOST	Gaydamakin A. Fractals in structure of a legal and administrative discourse // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2019. – Issue 10 C. 181-187 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S013207690007200-2-1 (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013207690007200-2
MLA	Gaydamakin, Andrey "Fractals in structure of a legal and administrative discourse." Gosudarstvo i pravo 10 (2019):181-187. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690007200-2
APA	Gaydamakin A. (2019). Fractals in structure of a legal and administrative discourse. Gosudarstvo i pravo (10), pp.181-187 DOI: 10.31857/S013207690007200-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1020

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gaydamakin A.A. Wesley Hofeld and analytical jurisprudence // Pravovedenie. 2012. No. 3. P. 189202 (in Russ.).

2. Code of laws // Encyclopedic dictionary of F.A. Brockhaus and I.A. Efron. SPb., 1890 - 1907. URL: www.vehi.net/brokgauz (accessed: 16.08.2018) (in Russ.).

3. Hofstede G. Hofstede Model in context: parameters of quantitative characteristics of cultures // Language, communication and social environment. 2014. No. 12. P. 23 (in Russ.).

4. Balkin J.M. Hohfeldian Semiotics // Miami univ.: law review. 1990. V. 44. P. 1119 - 1142.

5. Balkin J.M. The Crystalline Structure of Legal Thought // Rutgers law review, 1986. V. 39. ¹ 1. P. 2 - 103.

6. Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J, Minkov M. Cultures and Organizations. Software of Mind / McGraw-Hill eBooks. 2010. P. 192. URL: http://www.testrain.info/download/Software%20of%20mind.pdf (accessed: 16.08.2018).

7. Horii T., Jin Y., Levitt R.E. Impact of Multiple Normative Systems on Organization Performance of International Joint Ventures // Proceedings of the Symposium on Normative Multi-agent Systems, 1215 April, 2005. P. 62.

8. Kennedy D. A Semiotics of Legal Argument // Collected courses of the Academy of European Law, V. III. Book 2. P. 309 - 365.