All
 
|
 
 


Strong Wrath vs Strong Personality, Or Once Again About the Quarrel Between Achilles and Agamemnon
 
PIIS207987840026005-4-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840026005-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Victoria Pichugina 
Affiliation:
Higher School of Economics
Institute for Strategy of Education Development of the Russian Academy of Education
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

Episodes from “The Iliad” concerning the conflict between Agamemnon and Achilles are analyzed. Their quarrel and its results can be metaphorically defined as a model of wrath, with its lessons being given and learned not only by the participants themselves, but also by the witnesses. With the word “wrath” the poem begins and it is repeatedly presented in it, followed by different epithets. “The Iliad” is a work that justifies or at least explains why strong personalities are subject to intense wrath, since the wrath of gods and people leading the Trojan campaign. In the first part of the article, this conflict is viewed as wrath quarrel with a transition to personalities, where Achilles chooses between the power of words and the power of arms in favor of the latter. On the one hand, everything obtained in the devastated cities is divided among the leaders in fairness, and on the other hand, Chryseis and Briseis taken as concubines upset the balance of justice between Achilles and Agamemnon. The second part of the article analyzes the consequences of the quarrel between Agamemnon and Achilles, with suppression of wrath giving them opportunities for personal growth. The third part of the article discusses the origins of Achilles’ wrath behaviour, which are determined by excessive closeness with his mother and make it possible to contrast wrath in the family and wrath in the city.

KeywordsHomer, Iliad, Achilles, Agamemnon, wrath, city, lessons of wrath, school of wrath, strong personality
AcknowledgmentThe study was carried out with a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 18-78-10001).
Received13.03.2023
Publication date30.06.2023
Number of characters38896
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 113

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Mikhajlin V., Ksenofontov A. Vybor Akhilla // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2004. № 4 (68). S. 59—62.
2. Pichugina V. K., Zhirnova A. S. Vizual'nost' i narrativnost' v antichnoj traditsii ob Akhillese: unikal'nyj proekt aristokraticheskogo obrazovaniya // Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika. 2021. T. 1. № 4 (77). S. 30—44.
3. Avery H. C. Achilles’ third father // Hermes. 1998. Bd. 126. H. 4. R. 389—397.
4. Considine R. The etymology of μῆνις // Studies in Honour of T. B. L. Webster / ed. J. H. Betts, J. T. Hooker, J. R. Green. Vol. I. Bristol, 1986. R. 53—64.
5. Finlay R. Patroklos, Achilleus, and Peleus: Fathers and sons in the “Iliad” // The Classical World. 1980. Vol. 73. No. 5. R. 267—273.
6. Greene T. The Descent from Heaven: A Study in Epic Continuity. New Haven; L., 1963.
7. Gregory J. Cheiron’s way: youthful education in Homer and Tragedy. Oxford, 2019.
8. Gregory J. Sophocles and education // Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Sophocles / ed. A. Markantonatos. Leiden; Boston, 2012. R. 515—535.
9. Hammer D. Who shall readily obey? Authority and politics in the “Iliad” // Phoenix. 1997. Vol. 51. No. 1. R. 1—24.
10. Hanson A. E. Your mother nursed you with bile: anger in babies and small children // Yale Classical Studies. 2003. Vol. 32. R. 185—207.
11. Harris W. V. Restraining Rage: the ideology of anger control in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, 2000.
12. Held G. F. Phoenix, Agamemnon and Achilleus: Parable and Paradeigmata // The Classical Quarterly. 1987. Vol. 37. No. 2. P. 245—261.
13. Hobbs A. Plato and the Hero: Courage, Manliness and the Impersonal Good. Cambridge, 2000.
14. Jones M. Performing paideia: public and private masculinity in Chariton // Narrating Desire: Eros, Sex, and Gender in the Ancient Novel / ed. Futre Pinheiro M., Skinner M., Zeitlin F. I. B.; Boston, 2012. R. 89—104.
15. Mackie C. J. Achilles’ Teachers: Chiron and Phoenix in the “Iliad” // Greece & Rome. 1997. Vol. 44. No. 1. R. 1—10.
16. Michelakis P. Achilles in Greek Tragedy. Cambridge, 2002.
17. Mills S. Achilles, Patroclus and parental care in some Homeric similes // Greece & Rome. 2000. Vol. 47. No. 1. R. 3—18.
18. Montanari F. The failed embassy: Achilles in the Iliad // The Winnowing Oar — New Perspectives in Homeric Studies (Studies in Honor of Antonios Rengakos) / ed. C. Tsagalis, A. Markantonatos. B.; Boston, 2017. R. 43—55.
19. Redfield J. M. The proem to the Iliad: Homer’s art // Classical Philology. 1979. Vol. 74. No. 2. R. 95—110.
20. Rosner J. A. The Speech of Phoenix: “Iliad” 9.434—605 // Phoenix. 1976. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 314—327.
21. Scodel R. The autobiography of Phoenix: “Iliad” 9.444—95 // The American Journal of Philology. 1982. Vol. 103. No. 2. P. 128—136.
22. Van Nortwick T. Imagining Men: Ideals of Masculinity in Ancient Greek Culture. Westport, 2008.
23. Whitman C. H. Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, 1958.
24. Wilson D. F. Ransom, Revenge, and Heroic Identity in the Iliad. Cambridge, 2002.
25. Zanker G. The Heart of Achilles: Characterization and Personal Ethics in the Iliad. ‎Michigan, 1997.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up