The Cassock Does Not a Monk Make. Or Does It? Fake and Real Monks from the Orthodox East in the Russian Empire (19th — Early 20th Сentury)

 
Title (other)Казак — не монах. Но так ли это? Мнимые и настоящие монахи с Православного Востока в Российской империи (XIX—XX вв.)
PIIS207987840025202-1-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840025202-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Southern Connecticut State University
Address: USA, New Heaven
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

Monastic tonsure of citizens of the Russian Empire abroad became a particularly complex issue during the latter half of the nineteenth century, when Mt. Athos became a favorite destination of those interested in assuming the monastic habit outside the empire. The Russian authorities sought to control and regulate such tonsures by establishing procedures for checking their validity, and by ruling out automatic recognition of them in the empire. Individuals who were tonsured as monks abroad manipulated or tried to manipulate such regulations in order to facilitate travel back and forth from the Russian Empire for their own purposes. The result was that the real and apparent ambiguities that such rules allowed for were exploited by both state authorities and by real or fake monks themselves. The essay seeks to offer some perspectives on this phenomenon by focusing on four cases preserved in archival records.

KeywordsMount Athos, St. Panteleimon Monastery, monasticism, fake monks, tonsures abroad
Received12.01.2023
Publication date10.04.2023
Number of characters26353
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 126

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gerd L. Russkij Afon. M.: Indrik, 2010.

2. Kosheleva O. E. «Bez pasportov i s vorovskimi pashportu» ili mozhno li obmanut' gosudarstvennyj kontrol'? // Obman kak povsednevnaya praktika. Individual'nye i kollektivnye strategii povedeniya: kollektivnaya monografiya / pod red. O. I. Togoevoj i O. E. Koshelevoj. M.: IVI RAN, 2016. C. 323—348.

3. Chernukha V. G. Pasport v Rossii. 1719—1917 gg. SPb: Liki Rossii, 2007.

4. Shkarovskij M. V. Moskovskoe podvor'e // Istoriya Russkogo Svyato-Panteleimonova monastyrya na Afone s 1735 do 1912 g. T. 5. Svyataya Gora Afon, 2015. C. 570—578.

5. Chrissidis N. The Perils of Pious Practices: Alms Collection for the Holy Sepulcher in Late Imperial Russia // Strategii obmana v obschestvakh Srednikh vekov i Novogo vremeni. Sbornik statej / pod red. O. I. Togoevoj i O. E. Koshelevoj. M.: IVI RAN, 2017. C. 240—255.

6. Fennell N. The Russians on Athos. Oxford; N. Y.: Peter Lang, 2001.

7. Franklin S. Printing and Social Control in Russia 1: Passports // Russian History. 2010. T. 37 (3). P. 208—237.

8. Kenworthy S. M. Debating the Theology of the Name in Post-Soviet Russia: Metropolitan Ilarion Alfeev and Sergei Khoruzhii // Orthodox Paradoxes: Heterogeneities and Complexities in Contemporary Russian Orthodoxy / ed. by K. Tolstaya. Leiden: Brill, 2014. P. 250—264.

9. Kenworthy S. M. Archbishop Nikon (Rozhdestvenskii) and Pavel Florenskii on Spiritual Experience, Theology, and the Name-Glorifiers Dispute // Thinking Orthodox in Modern Russia: Culture, History, Context / ed. by P. L. Michelson and J. D. Kornblatt. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2014. P. 85—107.

10. Kennworthy S. M. The Mobilization of Piety: Monasticism and the Great War in Russia, 1914—1916 // Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. 2004. Bd. 52 (3). S. 388—401.

11. Papastathis Ch. He eidike nomike metacheirise ton Hagioriton. Thessaloniki: AFOI Kyriakide, 1988.

12. Smith A. K. For the common good and their own well-being: Social Estates in Imperial Russia. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2015.

13. Vovchenko D. Ignoring nationalism? Religious, corporate, material, regional and dynastic options on Mt Athos, 1839—1912 // Nations and Nationalism. 2021. No. 1. P. 1—17.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up