Soviet Atlantis: the Harappan Civilization in Soviet Oriental Studies in the 1920s and 1950s (to the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization)

Bukharin, Mikhail

doi:10.18254/S207987840024493-1

Home

ISTORIYA

Issue 2 (124)

Soviet Atlantis: the Harappan Civilization in Soviet Oriental Studies in the 1920s and 1950s (to the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization)

Annotation
Reviews
References

Soviet Atlantis: the Harappan Civilization in Soviet Oriental Studies in the 1920s and 1950s (to the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization)

PII

S207987840024493-1-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840024493-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Mikhail Bukharin

Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

ISTORIYA

Edition

Abstract

In the 1920s, intensive excavations were carried out in the Indus Valley. The formed the foundation for the study of the Harappan (Indus Valley) civilization. Information about the progress of the work also reached the USSR, but for a long time Soviet orientalists could only state the importance of excavations, unable to independently interpret their results. In the late 1930s, interest in the fate of the Harappan civilization in Soviet science increased sharply due to the aggressive policy of Germany. Soviet orientalists saw certain parallels between the actions of Germany and the Aryans, who invaded India and destroyed the Dravidian culture of Harappa in the eyes of Soviet orientalists. The Academy of Sciences of the USSR and the Council of People’s Commissars of the USSR allocated funds for the purchase of three articles by the Czechoslovak scientist B. Hrozny, with description of decipherment of Harappan inscriptions. This decipherment would provide the key to understanding the sense of the inscriptions and postulating “correct” conclusions. World Oriental studies did not accept the conclusions of B. Hrozny, but in the USSR his work found active support. It was the active introduction into the scientific circulation of these excavations in the Indus Valley that led to the final inclusion of India and China in the sphere of research on the history of the Ancient Orient. Interest in the conclusions of Hrozny was largely fueled by the independence of India (1947) and the proclamation of the republic (1950). In this regard, V. V. Struve is making a decisive attempt, based on the secondary interpretation of the excavations’ data of J. Marshall and E. Mackay, as well as a critical analysis of B. Hrozny’s approach to decipherment of Harappan inscriptions, to reconstruct the social type of the Harappan civilization, equalizing it typologically with the already known societies of the Ancient Orient. Struve’s conclusions are not based on the interpretation of the sources themselves, but on typological comparisons, that is, on conclusions made earlier about civilizations of the Middle East on the basis of the “correct” — class — approach, which in themselves were largely erroneous. By the mid-1950s the rhetoric of works on the history of the Harappan civilization is significantly softened. The main driver of interest in Soviet oriental studies of the 1920s — 1950s to the history of the Harappan civilization were changes in the situation in the world before and after World War II. Soviet orientalists created their own Harappa as an ideal ancient society, associating it in certain aspects with the USSR.

Keywords

ancient Orient, Harappa, Mohenjo-daro, archaeology, historiography, oriental studies, Soviet science

Received

14.11.2022

Publication date

15.03.2023

Number of characters

111248

Cite

GOST	Bukharin M. Soviet Atlantis: the Harappan Civilization in Soviet Oriental Studies in the 1920s and 1950s (to the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization) // ISTORIYA – 2023. – V. 14. – Issue 2 (124) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://history.jes.su/S207987840024493-1-1 (circulation date: 03.05.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840024493-1
MLA	Bukharin, Mikhail "Soviet Atlantis: the Harappan Civilization in Soviet Oriental Studies in the 1920s and 1950s (to the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization)." ISTORIYA 14.2 (124) (2023) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840024493-1
APA	Bukharin M. (2023). Soviet Atlantis: the Harappan Civilization in Soviet Oriental Studies in the 1920s and 1950s (to the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Indus Valley Civilization). ISTORIYA 14(2 (124)) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840024493-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 465

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avdiev V. I. Istoriya drevnego Vostoka. M.: OGIZ, 1948.

2. Avdiev V. I. Predislovie // Chajld G. Drevnejshij Vostok v svete novykh raskopok / red. Avdiev V. I. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoj literatury, 1956. S. 5—18.

3. Anan'ev V. G., Bukharin M. D. «Imena, kotorye nikogda ne budut zabyty…». Rossijskoe vostokovedenie v perepiske V. V. Bartol'da, N. Ya. Marra i S. F. Ol'denburga. M.: Varfolomeev A. D., 2020.

4. Anan'ev V. G., Bukharin M. D., Sapanzha O. S. «Nam nado stroit' zanovo ves' mir istorii iskusstv»: leningradskoe istoricheskoe iskusstvoznanie v diskussiyakh 1930-kh gg. M.: «Indrik», 2021.

5. Bogaevskij B. L. Vostok i Zapad v ikh drevnejshikh svyazyakh (po povodu novejshikh otkrytij v Indii) // Novyj Vostok. 1926. № 12. S. 214—229.

6. Bogaevskij B. L. Krit i Mikeny (ehgejskaya kul'tura). M.; L.: Vsemirnaya literatura, 1924.

7. Bogaevskij B. L. Orudiya proizvodstva i domashnie zhivotnye Tripol'ya. L.: Sotsehkgiz. Leningradskoe otdelenie, 1937.

8. Bokschanin A. «Vestnik drevnej istorii» № 1 i 2 za 1940 g. Institut istorii Akademii nauk SSSR // Istoricheskij zhurnal. 1941. № 1. S. 129—135.

9. Bongard-Levin G. M. Izobrazhenie khranilischa dlya zerna na pechatyakh Mokhendzho-Daro i Kharappy // Sovetskoe vostokovedenie. 1957. № 6. S. 119—123.

10. Bongard-Levin G. M. Istoriya i kul'tura Indii i Pakistana. Osnovnye ehtapy istorii. Drevnie kul'tury (istoriko-arkheologicheskij ocherk) // Narody Azii Yuzhnoj Azii. Indiya, Pakistan, Nepal, Sikkim, Butan, Tsejlon i Mal'divskie ostrova. M.: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1963. S. 51—99.

11. Borozdina T. V. Raskopki v Chankhu-Daro // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1946. № 1. S. 115—116.

12. Bukharin M. D. K istorii izucheniya buddijskogo iskusstva v SSSR v 1920-e gg. // Muzej-Pamyatnik-Nasledie. 2022 (v pechati).

13. V. A. Voprosy istorii na yubilejnoj sessii AN SSSR // Voprosy istorii. 1945. № 1. S. 149—151.

14. V. A. Sessiya po voprosam istorii Indii v Akademii nauk SSSR // Voprosy istorii. 1947. № 10. S. 147—153.

15. Vigasin A. A., Karpyuk S. G. Neizdannaya i zabytaya: «Istoriya kul'tury» 1941 g. // Kharkіvs'kij іstorіografіchnij zbіrnik. 2015. Vip. 14. S. 77—92.

16. Groznyj B. Ob odnoj interesnoj «khettskoj» ieroglificheskoj nadpisi // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1938. № 1. S. 23—30.

17. Groznyj B. Protoindijskie pis'mena i ikh rasshifrovka // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1940. № 2. S. 15—35.

18. Groznyj F. V pyati sovetskikh respublikakh // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1937. № 1. S. 14—24.

19. Dunaevskaya I. M., Reder D. G. Bedrzhikh Groznyj // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1953. № 3. S. 224—225.

20. Zakharov A. A. Doistoricheskaya tsivilizatsiya Indii // Novyj Vostok. 1928. № 22. S. 329—330.

21. Zakharov A. A. Novejshie raskopki v Zapadnoj Indii // Novyj Vostok. 1926. № 13—14. S. 458—460.

22. Zakharov A. A. Ehgejskij mir v svete novejshikh issledovanij. Petrograd: Sabashnikovy, 1924.

23. Zolotarev A. Indiya. IV. Arkheologiya Indii // Bol'shaya sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya. 1937. T. 28. S. 233—234.

24. Il'in G. F. Drevnejshaya Indiya // Vsemirnaya istoriya. V 10 t. T. I / otv. red. Frantsev Yu. P. M.: Glavnoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury, 1955. S. 422—434.

25. Il'in G. F. Novye perevodnye raboty po istorii drevnej Indii // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1952. № 2. S. 169—173.

26. Istoriya drevnego mira. Uchebnik dlya 5—6 klassov srednej shkoly / red. Mishulin A. V. M.: Gosudarstvennoe nauchno-pedagogicheskoe izdatel'stvo narkomprosa RSFSR, 1943.

27. Istoriya drevnego mira. Uchebnik dlya uchitel'skikh institutov / red. D'yakov V. N., Nikol'skij N. M. M.: Gosudarstvennoe uchebno-pedagogicheskoe izdatel'stvo ministerstva prosvescheniya RSFSR, 1952.

28. Karpyuk S. G., Krikh S. B. Istoriya drevnosti vo «Vsemirnoj istorii» // «Sovetskaya drevnost'»: lyudi, uchrezhdeniya, knigi i nauka o drevnosti v SSSR / otv. red. Karpyuk S. G. M.: IVI RAN, 2022. S. 56—124.

29. Karpyuk S. G., Kulishova O. V. Predvoennaya drevnyaya istoriya: S. A. Zhebelev i sovetsko-germanskie nauchnye svyazi v 1939—1941 gg. // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 2018. № 78 / 1. S. 389—404.

30. Korostovtsev M. A. Istoriya drevnego mira za 25 let // Dvadtsat' pyat' let istoricheskoj nauki v SSSR / red. Volgin V. P., Tarle E. V., Pankratova A. M. M.; L.: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk, 1942. S. 189—209.

31. Ladynin I. A. Ponyatie «Drevnij Vostok» v otechestvennoj istoriografii KhKh v. // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 2019. № 79 (3). S. 772—796.

32. Lemann-Gaupt K. F. Uspekhi izucheniya drevnej istorii za poslednie 50 let // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1937. № 1. S. 39—65.

33. Lur'e I., Lyapunova K., Mat'ev M., Piotrovskij B., Flittner N. Ocherki po istorii tekhniki Drevnego Vostoka / otv. red. Struve V. V. M.; L.: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1940.

34. Lyudi i sud'by. Bibliograficheskij slovar' vostokovedov-zhertv politicheskogo terrora v sovetskij period (1917—1991 gg.) / Vasil'kov Ya. V., Sorokina M. Yu. SPb.: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, 2003.

35. Makkej Eh. Drevnejshaya kul'tura doliny Inda. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoj literatury, 1951.

36. Mervart A. M. Grammatika tamil'skogo razgovornogo yazyka. L.: Izdanie Leningradskogo Vostochnogo Instituta imeni A. S. Enukidze, 1929.

37. Minaev I. P. Novye fakty otnositel'no svyazi drevnej Indii s Zapadom // Zhurnal ministerstva narodnogo prosvescheniya. 1870. CXLX. C. 225—239.

38. Mishulin A. V. Antichnaya Indiya // Bor'ba klassov. 1934. № 9. S. 58—65.

39. Mishulin A. V. K voprosu o rabstve na Vostoke // Struve V. V. Istoriya drevnego Vostoka. Kratkij kurs. M.: OGIZ. SOTsEhKIZ, 1934. S. 3—14.

40. Mishulin A. V. Otkrytie drevnejshej tsivilizatsii v doline Inda // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1938. № 1. S. 121—123.

41. Mokhendzho-Daro // Bol'shaya sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya. 1938. T. 40. S. 511.

42. Mokhendzho-Daro // Bol'shaya sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya. M., 1954. T. 28. S. 461.

43. Nikiforov D. N. Al'bom po drevnej istorii / red. Mishulin A. V. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1948.

44. Nikiforov D. N. Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo k tablitsam al'boma po drevnej istorii. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1948.

45. Osipov A. M. Kratkij ocherk istorii Indii do X v. M.: Izdanie MGU, 1948.

46. Problemy marksistskogo izucheniya drevnej istorii (peredovaya) // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1939. № 3. S. 3—10.

47. Razrabotka drevnej istorii v sovetskoj nauke // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1947. № 3. S. 3—17.

48. Rerikh Yu. N. Indologiya v Rossii // Rerikh Yu. Tibet i Tsentral'naya Aziya: Stat'i, lektsii, perevody / nauch. red. Vorob'eva-Desyatovskaya M. I. Samara: Izdatel'skij dom «Agni», 1999. C. 173—199.

49. Rubinshtejn R. I. Samyj drevnij gorod v Indii // Drevnij Vostok. Kniga dlya chteniya / red. Struve V. V. M.: Uchpedgiz, 1953. S. 192—195.

50. Snegirev I. L. Drevnejshaya Indiya v svete poslednikh arkheologicheskikh raskopok // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1940. № 2. S. 155—168.

51. Snegirev I. L. Drevnij Vostok. Atlas po drevnej istorii Egipta, Perednej Azii, Indii i Kitaya / red. Struve V. V. L.: Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo. Leningradskoe otdelenie, 1937.

52. Strelkov A. S. Doistoricheskaya kul'tura Srednego Vostoka v III—II tysyacheletii do n. eh. — Mokhendzho Daro i Kharappa (po povodu knigi: Sir John Marshall. Mohenjo Daro and the Indus Civilisation. L., 1931) // Sovetskaya Ehtnografiya. 1935. № 3. S. 96—107.

53. Struve V. V. Arijskaya problema // Sovetskaya ehtnografiya. 1947. Sbornik statej. VI—VII. S. 117—124.

54. Struve V. V. Deshifrovka protoindijskikh pis'men // Vestnik Akademii nauk SSSR. 1947. № 8. S. 51—58.

55. Struve V. V. Izuchenie istorii Drevnego Vostoka v SSSR za period 1917—1937 gg. // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1938. № 1. S. 13—22.

56. Struve V. V. Istoriya drevnego Vostoka. Kratkij kurs. M.: OGIZ. SOTsEhKIZ, 1934.

57. Struve V. V. Istoriya drevnego Vostoka. L.: OGIZ, 1941.

58. Struve V. V. Predislovie // Vulli L. Ur khaldeev. M.: «Izdatel'stvo vostochnoj literatury», 1961. S. 5—11.

59. Struve V. V. Predislovie // Makkej Eh. Drevnejshaya kul'tura doliny Inda. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoj literatury, 1951. S. 5—26.

60. Struve V. V. Problemy istorii Drevnego Vostoka v sovetskoj istoriografii // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1947. № 3. S. 17—42.

61. Struve V. V. Protoindijskie nadpisi // Obschee sobranie Akademii nauk SSSR 10—13 iyunya 1947 g. Doklady / otv. red. Vavilov S. I. M.; L.: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1948. S. 111—121.

62. Tolstov S. P. Drevnij Khorezm. Opyt istoriko-arkheologicheskogo issledovaniya. M.: MGU, 1948.

63. Tolstov S. P. Novye materialy po istorii kul'tury drevnego Khorezma (predvaritel'nye itogi rabot Khorezmskoj arkheologicheskoj ehkspeditsii Instituta istorii material'noj kul'tury Akademii Nauk SSSR 1940 g.) // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1946. № 1. S. 60—101.

64. Turaev B. A. Istoriya drevnego Vostoka / red. Struve V. V., Snegirev I. L. Tret'e izdanie stereotipnoe. T. I. L.: OGIZ, 1936.

65. Tyulyaev S. Arkheologicheskie otkrytiya v Indii // Istoricheskij zhurnal. 1941. № 1. S. 79—89.

66. Tyulyaev S. Drevnee iskusstvo Indii // Iskusstvo. 1955. № 6. S. 49—55.

67. Tyulyaev S. I. Arkhitektura Indii M.: Izdatel'stvo Vsesoyuznoj Akademii arkhitektury, 1939.

68. Kharappa // Bol'shaya sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya. M., 1957. T. 46. S. 70.

69. Sholpo N. A. Indiya // Istoriya kul'tury. T. I. M., 1941. S. 221—233 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://histrf.ru/read/articles/istoriia-kul-tury-tom-i

70. Sholpo N. A. K probleme «arijskogo zavoevaniya» drevnej Indii // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1939. № 3. S. 40—48.

71. Ehrman V. G. Izuchenie drevnej Indii v Leningrade // Uchenye zapiski Instituta vostokovedeniya. 1960. T. 25. S. 150—161.

72. Bongard-Levin G. M., Lardinois R., Vigasin A. A. Correspondance orientalistes entre Paris et Saint-Pétersbourg (1887—1935). Sylvain Lévi, Alfred Foucher, Émile Senart et Paul Pelliot. Lettres adressées à Sergej F. Ol’denburg, Fedor I. Ščerbatskoj, Vasilij M. Alekseev, Vasilij V. Radlov et Fridrich Rozenberg. P., 2002. Mémoirs de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. XXVI.

73. Brunswig R. H. jr. A Comprehensive Bibliography of the Indus Civilization and Related Subjects and Areas // Asian Perspectives. 1973. Vol. 16. No. 1. R. 75—111.

74. Hrozny B. Inschriften und Kultur der Proto-Inder von Mohenjo-Daro und Harappa (ca. 2490—2100 v. Chr.). I (Mit 10 Tafeln) // Archiv orientální. 1941. XII. S. 192—259.

75. Hrozny B. Inschriften und Kultur der Proto-Inder von Mohenjo-Daro und Harappa (ca. 2490—2100 v. Chr.). II (Mit 19 Tafeln). Ein Entzifferungsversuch // Archiv Orientalni 1942. XIII. S. 1—102.

76. Hrozný B. Ueber die Aelteste Völkerwanderung und über das Problem der proto-indischen Zivilisation: ein Versuch, die proto-indischen Inschriften von Mohendscho-Daro zu entziffern. Prag: Orientalisches Institut, 1939.

77. Mackay T. J. H. Die Induskultur. Leipzig: F. U. Brockhaus, 1938.

78. Mackay T. J. H. Early Indus Civilization. L.: Clay and Sons, Ltd., 1935.

79. Marshall J. Mohenjo-Daro and the Indus Civilization. Being an Official Account of Archaeological Excavations at Mohenjo-Daro Carried out by the Government of India between the Years 1922 and 1927. Vol. I—V. L., 1931.

80. Ort-Geuthner G. Le déchiffrement par M. Hrozný des hiéroglyphes proto-indiens // Syria. 1940. T. 21. Fasc. 3 / 4. P. 241—246.

81. The Soviet Decipherment of the Indus Valley Script. Translation and Critique / ed. Zide A. R., Zvelebil K. V. Hague; P.: Mouton, 1976. Janua Linguarum. Series Practica. Vol. 156.