Migration Risk as a Global Challenge of Our Time: Russia and Europe

 
PIIS207987840024074-0-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840024074-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Kazan
Affiliation: Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Kazan
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The article provides a comparative analysis of migration risk management processes in European countries and in Russia, based on several case studies. The authors substantiate the risk paradigm as a scientific approach to the research of the migration situation on the territory of the host countries, analyze the concepts in the field of migration risk management, forms of social work with migrants, research strategies in the field of migration, and various methodological areas of work with migrants. The cases of Italy, Israel, Russia are considered (on the example of three subjects of the Russian Federation). There is a similarity of problems generated by migration risks in Russia and Europe. It was revealed that different approaches to migration management are used in different countries of Europe. European countries faced a set of these problems much earlier and began to regulate them earlier. At the same time, even now the measures taken against migrants cannot be considered sufficient and effective. In Russia, there are significant reserves in the development of migration policy, and the unrealized potential for preventing migration risks is high.

Keywordsmigration, migration risk, adaptation, risk prediction
Received18.07.2022
Publication date30.12.2022
Number of characters37545
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 154

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arbatova N. K. Pribytie zaderzhivaetsya // Kommersant.ru. 29 iyunya 2015 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2748082 (data obrascheniya: 19.09.2021).

2. Bek U. Obschestvo riska: na puti k drugomu modernu. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000.

3. Brishpolets K., Babadzhanov A. Migratsionnye riski stran Tsentral'noj Azii: Analiticheskie zapiski. Vyp. 2 (22) (fevral' 2007). Nauchno-koordinatsionnyj sovet po mezhdunarodnym issledovaniyam MGIMO (U) MID Rossii. M., 2007.

4. Luman N. Ponyatie riska // THESIS. 1994. № 5. S. 135—160.

5. Luman N. Sotsial'nye sistemy. Ocherk obschej teorii / per. s nem. Gaziev I. D., red. Golovin N. A. SPb.: Nauka, 2007.

6. Massej D. Sinteticheskaya teoriya mezhdunarodnoj migratsii // Mir v zerkale mezhdunarodnoj migratsii: Nauchnaya seriya: mezhdunarodnaya migratsiya naseleniya: Rossiya i sovremennyj mir / red. Iontsev V. A. 2002. Vyp. 10. S. 131—154.

7. Migratsionnye riski kak faktor vozniknoveniya konfliktov: evrazijskij i evropejskij opyt resheniya. Monografiya / red. Fakhrutdinov R. R., Sakaev V. T., Panchenko O. L. Kazan': Izdatel'stvo Kazanskogo universiteta, 2020.

8. Mozgovaya A. V. Risk v sotsial'nom prostranstve. M.: Izdatel'stvo Instituta sotsiologii RAN, 2001.

9. Nemirovskij V. G., Kudryavtseva V. I. Universumnyj podkhod k dinamike sotsial'nykh sistem: analiz i prognozirovanie. Monografiya. Krasnoyarsk; Minsk: Krasnoyarskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, Belorusskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2003.

10. Otnoshenie vzroslogo naseleniya Krasnoyarskogo kraya k predstavitelyam drugikh natsional'nostej, inostrannym trudovym migrantam i natsional'nomu ehkstremizmu (po rezul'tatam sotsiologicheskikh issledovanij, aprel'—maj 2015 g.) // Informatsionnyj byulleten' po voprosam mezhehtnicheskikh, mezhkonfessional'nykh i migratsionnykh otnoshenij v Krasnoyarskom krae. № 9. Krasnoyarsk: Polikor, 2015.

11. Perspektivy mirovoj urbanizatsii: peresmotr 2018 g. // Organizatsiya Ob'edinennykh Natsij. Departament po ehkonomicheskim i sotsial'nym voprosam. Otdel narodonaseleniya (2018 g.).

12. Praktika vzaimodejstviya sibirskogo regiona v sfere realizatsii gosudarstvennoj natsional'noj politiki: polikul'turnaya obrazovatel'naya platforma Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta. Kollektivnaya monografiya / otv. red. Smolyaninova O. G. Krasnoyarsk: Grotesk, 2016.

13. Ryabova E. L., Bormotova T. M., Radchenko A. F., Suzdaleva T. R. Migratsionnye protsessy sovremennoj Rossii: politicheskoe prognozirovanie v upravlenii. Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Mezhdunarodnyj izdatel'skij tsentr «Ehtnosotsium», 2015.

14. Sakaev V. T. Migratsii v Rossijskoj Federatsii v XXI v.: sotsial'no-politicheskie riski // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2013. T. 155. Kn. 1. S. 214—221.

15. Trufanov D. O., Rafikov R. G. Migratsionnoe prostranstvo regiona i ego deformatsii // Siberian Socium. 2018. T. 2. № 1. S. 97—114.

16. Uezzhat' stali chut' men'she: Volgograd ostalsya gorodom, iz kotorogo begut [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://v1.ru/text/gorod/2019/04/12/66053068/ (data obrascheniya: 25.10.2021).

17. Fahrutdinov R., Panchenko O. Muslim Migrants in the Eurasian Space: Risks of Adaptation and Predictors of Conflicts // ISTORIYA. 2021. Vol. 12. Issue 5 (103). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840015993-1-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840015993-1

18. Shlykova E. V. «Risk» kak faktor intolerantnogo otnosheniya k migrantam // Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie. 2010. № 30 (yanvar'—iyun'). S. 151—180.

19. Yanitskij O. N. Sotsiologiya riska: klyuchevye idei // Mir Rossii. № 1. 2003. S. 3—35.

20. Betz H.-G. The Extremes Win Todayʼs Elections // Centre for Analysis of the Radical Right CARR. 1 February 2020 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.radicalrightanalysis.com/2020/02/01/the-extremes-win-todays-elections/ (data obrascheniya: 25.11.2021).

21. Bilancio demografico nazionale al 31 dicembre 2016. Istat, 2017.

22. Cittadini stranieri: condizioni di salute, fattori di rischio, ricorso alle cure e accessibilità dei servizi sanitari. Ministero della Salute e Istat, 2014.

23. Corak M. “Inequality is the root of social evil,” or Maybe Not? Two Stories about Inequality and Public Policy // Canadian Public Policy. 2016. Vol. 42. Iss. 4. R. 367—414.

24. Gli alunni con cittadinanza non italiana, A. S. 2016/2017. Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, 2018.

25. Gold R., Fetzer Th. Die ökonomischen Ursachen des Populismus. Kiel Institut für Weltwirtschaft. 11.2019 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.ifw-kiel.de/index.php?id=13458&L=1 (data obrascheniya: 21.11.2021).

26. Isin Engin F. Enacting International Citizenship // International Political Sociology: Transversal Lines / ed. Basaran T., Bigo D., Guittet E.-P., Walker R. B. J. L.: Routledge, 2017.

27. Isin Engin F. Performative Citizenship // The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship / ed. Shachar A., Bauböck S., Bloemraad R., Vink I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. R. 500—523.

28. Lin A. R., Fahey Lawrence J., Snow C. E. Teaching urban youth about controversial issues: Pathways to becoming active and informed citizens // Citizenship, Social and Economics Education. 2015. Vol. 14. Is. 2. P. 103—119.

29. Menezes I. Participation experiences and civic concepts, attitudes and engagement: implications for citizenship education projects // European Educational Research Journal. 2003. Vol. 2. Iss. 3. P. 430—445.

30. Pinkett R. D. Bridging the digital divide: socio-cultural constructionism and an asset-based approach to community technology and community building // Paper presented at the 81st Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). New Orleans, 2000.

31. Rosoli G. Un secolo di emigrazione italiana 1876—1976. Roma: Cser, 1978.

32. Timbro Authoritarian Populism Index 2019 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://populismindex.com/report/ (data obrascheniya: 22.11.2021).

33. Villa M., Emmi V., Corradi E. Migranti: la sfida dell’integrazione. ISPI/CESVI. Milano, 2018.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up