Ecstasy and Exodus in the Interpretation of Philo of Alexandria and Lev Shestov

The biblical tradition of Exodus and the philosophical tradition of ecstasy seem both incompatible and identical. The Greek “ecstasy” (ἔκστασις — “going out of oneself”) suggests possession, sacred madness, poetic or philosophical inspiration. In Plato and Plotinus, ecstasy belongs to the spiritual elite and is universal. On the contrary, the Exodus in the Bible is performed by a whole people — Israel. Ecstasy takes place outside of time, while Exodus belongs to meta-history. Yet there is certain commonality between these two ideas. Both ecstasy and Exodus imply an escape, a flight either from earthly things to heavenly or from bondage to freedom. Based on this commonality, Philo of Alexandria combined ecstasy with Exodus into a single discourse, using Greek colonial language. In the terms of ecstasy, he considered himself to be a citizen of a heavenly city. On Earth, he is just a foreigner striving for personal inspiration, for coming back to his fatherland, to the heaven. In the terms of Exodus, however, he is a colonist on Earth, a citizen of an earthly city, Alexandria. Alexandria is the fatherland of Alexandrian Jews, while Jerusalem is their metropolis. In the hour of trouble, he cares about his fellow citizens, the Jews. His ultimate goal is not the release of the spirit of its bodily prison, but the release of Israel from slavery. He hates the enemies of Israel, and cherishes the hope of revenge. By combining both concepts, Philo still did not overcome the conflict between them. His consciousness remains torn between Jewish and Hellenic, native and universal, human and superhuman. These contradictions were fully manifested in the mind of another «Alexandrian», the Russian philosopher with Jewish roots, Lev Shestov.

Keywords

Exodus, ecstasy, Plato, Plotinus, Philo of Alexandria, Lev Shestov, Erwin Goodenough

Received

01.08.2022

Publication date

15.12.2022

Number of characters

41027

Cite

GOST	Kovelman A. Ecstasy and Exodus in the Interpretation of Philo of Alexandria and Lev Shestov // ISTORIYA – 2022. – V. 13. – Issue 11 (121) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://history.jes.su/S207987840023161-6-1 (circulation date: 18.05.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840023161-6
MLA	Kovelman, Arkady "Ecstasy and Exodus in the Interpretation of Philo of Alexandria and Lev Shestov." ISTORIYA 13.11 (121) (2022) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840023161-6
APA	Kovelman A. (2022). Ecstasy and Exodus in the Interpretation of Philo of Alexandria and Lev Shestov. ISTORIYA 13(11 (121)) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840023161-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 226

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Averintsev S. S. Poehtika rannevizantijskoj literatury. M., 1977.

2. Akhutin A. V. Odinokij myslitel' // Shestov L. I. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M., 1993. S. 3—14.

3. Baranova-Shestova N. Zhizn' L'va Shestova: po perepiske i vospominaniyam sovremennikov: v 2-kh t. P., 1983.

4. Baryshnikov A. A Cognitive History of Roman Britain: New Opportunities? // ISTORIYA. 2021. Vol. 12. Is. 8 (106). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840016462-7-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016462-7

5. Berdyaev N. A. Russkaya ideya. SPb., 2008.

6. Budanova V. The Cognitive Map of Barbarity: Term, Notion, Innovative Essence // ISTORIYA. 2021. Vol. 12. Is. 8 (106). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840016978-4-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016978-4

7. Gegel' G. V. F. Ehstetika. T. 1—4 / per. V. A. Modestova i B. G. Stolpnera. SPb., 2013.

8. Kovel'man A. B., Gershovich U. Sokrytoe i yavlennoe v Talmude. Ocherk nefilosofskogo myshleniya na iskhode antichnosti. M., 2016.

9. Platon. Sochineniya: v 4 t. / pod red. A. F. Loseva i V. F. Asmusa. SPb., 2007.

10. Filon Aleksandrijskij. Tolkovaniya Vetkhogo Zaveta. M., 2000.

11. Chakovskaya L. S. Ehrvin Gudenaf: istoriya nauchnogo odinochestva // Materialy devyatoj ezhegodnoj mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii po iudaike. V 2-kh ch. M., 2002. Ch. 2. S. 355—366.

12. Shestov L. I. Sochineniya v 2-kh tomakh / pod red. A. V. Akhutina. M., 1993. (Prilozhenie k zhurnalu «Voprosy filosofii»).

13. Shestov L. I. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. Tomsk, 1996.

14. Adorno Th. W. Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt am Main, 1973.

15. Bloch R. Leaving Home: Philo of Alexandria on the Exodus // Israel’s Exodus in Transdisciplinary Perspective – Text, Archaeology, Culture, and Geoscience / ed. by Th. E. Levy, Th. Schneider, W.H.C. Propp. N. Y., 2015. P. 357—364.

16. Corpus Papyrorum Judaicarum / eds. V. Tcherikover, A. Fuks. Vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass., 1960.

17. Goodenough E. R. The Politics of Philo Judaeus: Practice and Theory. New Haven; L., 1938.

18. Goodenough E. R. By Light, Light: The Mystic Gospel of Hellenistic Judaism. Amsterdam, 1969.

19. Hofmann K. Poetry after Auschwitz – Adorno’s Dictum // German Life and Letters. 2005. Bd. 58, 2. S. 192—194.

20. Mattes E. B. Myth for Moderns: Erwin Ramsdell Goodenough and Religious Studies in America, 1938—1955. Lanham, Md., 1997.

21. Pearce S. Jerusalem as “Mother-City” in the Writings of Philo of Alexandria // Negotiating Diaspora: Jewish Strategies in the Roman Empire / ed. by J. M. G. Barclay. (Library of Second Temple Studies, 45). N. Y., 2004. P. 19–37.

22. Seland T. “Colony” and “Metropolis” in Philo. Examples of Mimicry and Hybridity in Philo’s writing back from the Empire? // Études platoniciennes. 2010. Vol. 7. (Philon d’Alexandrie). P. 11—33.