History through Personality: the Anatomy of one Denunciation

 
PIIS207987840021552-6-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840021552-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch at the RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Ekaterinburg
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

In science, including historical science, there is no single and exhaustive definition of the concept of “personality”. The latter is not infrequently interpreted in close relationship with high morality, as something belonging to an elite culture, loaded with positive connotations. At the same time, a more axiologically neutral interpretation of the individual “as a receptacle of the socio-cultural system of his time” (A. Ya. Gurevich), as “an individual in his social quality” (D. V. Panchenko) is also widely used. It is in this vein that the author of the article analyzes the actions of one of the “ordinary personalities” of the beginning of the 18th century — a small Tula industrialist S. D. Evtifyev. The denunciation he wrote to Senator Prince G. I. Volkonsky in 1712 turns out, despite the small volume, to be an extremely capacious document in content. It does not just reveal the mechanisms of avoiding customs taxation or the details of solving interpersonal conflicts, but allows through the actions of individuals mentioned in the source to reveal the social practices and motivations inherent in the Petrine era.

Keywordspersonality, society, Semyon Evtifeev, Nikita Demidov, Prince Grigory Volkonsky, Senate, customs, customs duties, embezzlement, denunciation
Received31.03.2022
Publication date29.07.2022
Number of characters31109
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 180

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Balkovaya V. G. Organizatsiya tamozhennogo deloproizvodstva v Rossijskoj imperii v XVIII veke // Vestnik Saratovskoj gosudarstvennoj yuridicheskoj akademii. 2012. № 5 (88). S. 17—22.

2. Batkin L. M. K sporam o logiko-istoricheskom opredelenii individual'nosti // Odissej, 1990. S. 59—75.

3. Gavrilov A. K. Traditsionnye istoriko-filologicheskie priemy — neobkhodimoe uslovie novizny // Odissej, 1990. S. 17.

4. Golofast V. B. Mnogoobrazie biograficheskikh povestvovaniya // Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal. 1995. № 1. S. 71—88.

5. Gurevich A. Ya. K chitatelyu // Odissej, 1989. S. 5—10.

6. Gurevich A. Ya. Esche neskol'ko zamechanij k diskussii o lichnosti i individual'nosti v istorii kul'tury // Odissej, 1990. S. 76—89.

7. Kafengauz B. B. Istoriya khozyajstva Demidovykh v XVIII—XIX vv.: Opyt issledovaniya po istorii ural'skoj metallurgii. T. 1.M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1949.

8. Panchenko D. V. Lichnosti svojstvenno nekoe blagorodstvo // Odissej, 1989. S. 18—20.

9. Rashkovskij E. B. Lichnost' kak oblik i kak samostoyan'e // Odissej, 1990. S. 13—14.

10. Repina L. P. Lichnost' i obschestvo, ili istoriya v biografiyakh. Vmesto predisloviya // Istoriya cherez lichnost': Istoricheskaya biografiya segodnya / pod red. L. P. Repinoj. 2-e izd. M.: Kvadriga, 2010. S. 5—16.

11. Serov D. O. Fiskal'skaya sluzhba i prokuratura Rossii v pervoj treti XVIII v. Saarbryuken: Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2012.

12. Siarto I. Bog v detalyakh. Chetyre argumenta v zaschitu mikroistorii // Kazus. Individual'noe i unikal'noe v istorii. M., 2017. S. 301—307.

13. Tendryakova M. V. Esche raz o sotsial'no-istoricheskoj «prarodine» lichnosti // Odissej, 1995. S. 125—139.

14. Fedyukin I. I. Prozhektery: politika shkol'nykh reform v Rossii v pervoj polovine XVIII v. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2020.

15. Yurkin I. N. Demidovy: Stoletie pobed. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2017.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up