The Problem of Muhajirism in the Context of the Ottoman Migration Policy

 
PIIS207987840019580-7-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840019580-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation:
Lobachevsky University
Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod; Moscow
Affiliation: Lobachevsky University
Address: Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod
Affiliation: Lobachevsky University
Address: Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The article examines the historical context of muhajirism. The authors analyze the etymology of the term muhajir, which has no direct equivalent in Russian or other European languages. In the context of Islamic civilization, this term is used as a designation for “refugees” and related concepts. The authors investigate this phenomenon from the point of view of the policy of the Ottoman government regarding the resettlement of Muslims from Russia and attempts to incorporate them into the population of the Empire in the context of general legislation on citizenship. Particular attention is paid to the Ottoman legislation on the status of muhajirs, which over time provided immigration privileges and subsidies, as well as a way of expressing people’s social identification. The conclusion drawn in this article is that the concept of muhajirism is quite complex and has a rich religious heritage.

KeywordsMuhajirs, Ottoman Empire, hijra, migration, refugees, North Caucasus
AcknowledgmentThe research was completed under the RSCF grant No. 20-18-00374 performed on the basis of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod.
Received06.02.2022
Publication date29.07.2022
Number of characters23485
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 171

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Konventsiya i protokol o statuse bezhentsa ot 28 iyulya 1951 g. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://normativ.kontur.ru/document?moduleId=1&documentId=12646

2. Crews R. D. For Prophet and Tsar: Islam and Empire in Russia and Central Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.

3. Conditions arrêtées par le Gouvernement Impérial au sujet de la colonisation en Turquie (25 February 1857) // Législation Ottomane / ed. Aristarchi Bey G. Istanbul: Frères Nicolaïdes, 1873—1888. P. 16—19.

4. Dündar F. İttihat ve Terakki’nin Müslümanları İskan Politikası (1913—1918). Istanbul: İletişim, 2001.

5. Foreign Jihadis Change Face of Syrian Civil War // The Guardian. 25 December 2014.

6. Gould R. Hijra Before ISIS // The Montréal Review. May 2015.

7. Hanley W. Identifying with Nationality: Europeans, Ottomans, and Egyptians in Alexandria. N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 2017.

8. Hoerder D. Cultures in contact: World migrations in the second millennium. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002.

9. Kasaba R. A Moveable Empire: Ottoman Nomads, Migrants, and Refugees. Seattle, WA: Washington University Press, 1999.

10. Karpat K. H. Millets and Nationality: The Roots of the Incongruity of Nation and State in the Post-Ottoman Era // Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Empire / ed. Braude B., Lewis B. N. Y.: Holmes & Meier Publishers, 1982.

11. Karpat K. H. Ottoman Population, 1830—1914: Demographic and Social Characteristics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.

12. Karpat K. H. The Status of the Muslim Under European Rule: The Eviction and Settlement of the Çerkes // Studies on Ottoman Social and Political History: Selected Articles and Essays / ed. Karpat K. H. Leiden: Brill, 2002.

13. Kemper M. The Daghestani Legal Discourse on the Imamate // Central Asian Survey. 2002. Vol. 21 (3). P. 265—278.

14. Khaled Abou El Fadl. Islamic Law and Muslim Minorities: The Juristic Discourse on Muslim Minorities from the Second / Eighth to the Eleventh / Seventeenth Centuries // Islamic Law and Society. 1994. Vol. 1. No. 2. R. 141—187.

15. Lucassen L. Towards a comparative history of migration and membership in Southeast Europe // Ethnologia Balkanica. 2009. No. 3. R. 21—22.

16. Mazower M. Salonica, city of ghosts: Christians, muslims and jews, 1430—1950. L.: HarperCollins, 2004.

17. Richards J. J. Mohajir Subnationalism and the Mohajir Qaumi Movement in Sindh Province, Pakistan. Ph. D. dissertation. University of Cambridge, 1994.

18. Zamindar V. F.-Y. The Long Partition and the Making of Modern South Asia: Refugees, Boundaries, Histories. N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 2010.

19. Zhemukhov S. The Birth of Modern Circassian Nationalism // Nationalities Papers. 2012. Vol. 40. No. 4. P. 503—524.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up