All
 
|
 
 


Formation of New Life Strategies of the Nomadic Kazakhs the Imperial Frontier of the 19th — Early 20th Century
 
PIIS207987840004313-3-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840004313-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Svetlana Kovalskaya 
Affiliation: Gumilyov Eurasian National University
Address: Kazahstan, Nur-Sultan
Sergey Lyubichankovskiy
Affiliation:
Orenburg State Pedagogical University
Samara Federal Research Scientific Center RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Orenburg
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The article will analyze the process of the formation of new, different from traditional, life strategies of Kazakh nomads of the imperial frontier zone of the 19th — early 20th centuries based on the analysis of various sources, as well as works and studies devoted to characterizing the specifics of the existence of nomadic forms of management. We studied materials 175 of the Fund of the State Archive of the Orenburg Region, as well as Temporary Provisions on Management in the Steppe Regions of the Orenburg and West Siberian Governor-Generals and Materials on Kyrgyz Land Use published from 1896 to 1915. In addition, certain works of Kazakh literature were drawn, which are unique historical sources. The article is based on the analysis of various historical sources, as well as works and studies devoted to the characteristics of the existence of nomadic forms of management and formation the new types of life strategy. A critical approach to various historical sources allowed us to compare the diverse factual material, reconstruct the transformation, and change in the self-awareness of yesterday's nomads Nomads maximally inscribed in nature and the surrounding landscape retained their identity through the realization of a pastoral way of life and mentality. The gradual, ever more active manifestation of the new logic of development proposed by the Russian Empire, which is alien to nomads, made the Kazakhs develop new mechanisms for survival and self-realization in the proposed circumstances, adapting to them as much as possible. The Kazakh elite of the turn of the 19th — 20th centuries tried to give answers to the classical questions of the intelligentsia: who is to blame and what to do? It was necessary to determine in the further perspective of life: to preserve nomadism, to seek other substitute forms of semi-nomadic forms, or gradually to move to a sedentary life. The specificity of the frontier territory was manifested in the fact that nomadic Kazakhs were actively involved in the process of transforming everyday life and, in order to protect their lands from increasing competition of peasants, learned to rely not only on their own resources, but also to find support in local authorities.

Keywordsnomadic Kazakhs, nomadism, nomads, imperative of behavior, life strategy, acculturation, frontier
Received16.10.2020
Publication date27.12.2021
Number of characters39679
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 247

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Adzhigali S. Kul'turno-istoricheskie innovatsii v traditsionnoj sisteme skotovodcheskogo poseleniya serediny XIX v. (k voprosu o genezise statsionarnykh kystau) // Kul'tura kochevnikov na rubezhe vekov (XIX—XX vv., XX—XXI vv): problemy genezisa i transformatsii. Almaty, 1995. S. 133—152.
2. Bekmakhanova N. E. Mnogonatsional'noe naselenie Kazakhstana i Kirgizii v ehpokhu razvitiya kapitalizma (60-e g. XIX v. — 1917 v.). M.: Nauka, 1986. S. 102.
3. Bykov A. Yu. Rossiya i Kazakhstan (XVII—XIXvv.) // Tyurkologicheskij sbornik, 2002. Rossiya i tyurkskij mir. M., 2003. S. 51—118.
4. Vasil'ev D. V., Lyubichankovskij S. V. Kazakhi i russkie: bytovaya akkul'turatsiya v XIX v. // Voprosy istorii. 2018. № 3. S. 151—165. i dr.
5. Golovnyov A. V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti Severnoj Evrazii). Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN; «Volot», 2009.
6. Dzhampeisova Zh. M. Pastbischnaya territoriya i ee ob'ekty (na primere rassmotreniya tsennostnogo znacheniya zemel'nykh resursov kazakhov Atbasarskogo uezda v kontse XIX v.) // Vestnik Evrazijskogo gumanitarnogo instituta. № 1-2. 2014. S. 48—53.
7. Dzhundzhuzov S. V., Lyubichankovskij S. V. Missionerskaya deyatel'nost' Nikodima Lenkeevicha v Kalmytskom khanstve (1725—1734 gg.) // Novyj istoricheskij vestnik. 2017. № 3. S. 172—191.
8. Delyoz Zh., Gvattari F. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; M.: Astrel', 2010.
9. Kekil'baev A. Pleyady sozvezdie nadezhd. Roman. Perevod s kazakhskogo. Almaty: Zhazushy, 2009.
10. Koval'skaya S. I. Istoriya Kazakhstana. 1731—1916 gg. Astana: ENU im. L. N. Gumileva, 2003. S. 15.
11. Kovalskaya S., Lyubichankovskiy S. Orthodox Churches of Akmola County at the Turn of the 19th — 20th Centuries and Their Accultural Impact on the Development of the Kazakh Steppe // ISTORIYA. 2019. Vol. 10. Issue 1 (75). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002552-6-1/  DOI: 10.18254/S0002552-6-1
12. Kochevniki. Ehstetika. Poznanie mira traditsionnym kazakhskim iskusstvom. Almaty: Gylym, 1993. S. 3.
13. Lyubichankovskij S. V. Politika akkul'turatsii v usloviyakh razrusheniya imperii: kazus volostnogo zemstva // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2017. № 50. S. 31—37.
14. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu, sobrannye i razrabotannye ehkspeditsiej po issledovaniyu stepnykh oblastej / pod. red. Scherbina F. Akmolinskaya oblast'. Kokchetavskij uezd. T. I. Voronezh, 1898.
15. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu. T. II. Akmolinskaya oblast'. Atbasarskij uezd. Voronezh, 1902. S. 534.
16. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu. T. IV. Semipalatinskaya oblast'. Pavlodarskij uezd. Voronezh, 1903. S. 762.
17. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu. T. V. Turgajskaya oblast'. Kustanajskij uezd. Voronezh, 1903. S. 537.
18. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu. T. III. Akmolinskaya oblast'. Akmolinskij uezd. Ch. 1. SPb., 1907. S. 735.
19. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu v Syrdar'inskoj oblasti. Chimkentskij uezd. T. 1. Tashkent, 1908. S. 643.
20. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu. T. III. Akmolinskaya oblast'. Akmolinskij uezd. Ch. 1. SPb., 1907. S. 735; Ch. ІІ. Chernigov, 1909. S. 928.
21. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu. T. 2. Vyp. 1. Chimkentskij uezd. Tashkent, 1910. S. 277.
22. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu. T. 2. Vyp. 2. Chimkentskij uezd. Tablitsy. Tashkent, 1910.
23. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu, sobrannye i razrabotannye Statisticheskoj partiej Turgajsko – Ural'skogo pereselencheskogo rajona. Turgajskij uezd. Orenburg, 1911.
24. Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol'zovaniyu rajona reki Chu i nizov'ev reki Talasa Chernyaevskogo i Aulieatinskogo uezdov Syr–Dar'inskoj oblasti.  Tashkent: Tipo – Litografiya V. M. Il'ina, 1915.
25. Markov G. E. Kochevniki Azii: struktura khozyajstva i obschestvennoj organizatsii. M.: MGU, 1976.
26. Martin V. Zakon i obychaj v Stepi: kazakhi Srednego zhuza i Rossijskij kolonializm v XIX v. Almaty: Sanat, 2009.
27. Masanov N. Eh. Kochevaya tsivilizatsiya kazakhov. Almaty: «Sotsinvest»; M.: «Gorizont», 1995.
28. Nurlanova K. Simvolika mira v traditsionnom iskusstve kazakhov // Kochevniki. Ehstetika. Poznanie mira traditsionnym kazakhskim iskusstvom. Almaty: Gylym, 1993. S. 208—261.
29. Nurlanova K. Sh. Chelovek i mir: kazakhskaya natsional'naya ideya. Almaty: Қarzhy-Қarazhat, 1994.
30. Poehty pyati vekov. Kazakhskaya poehziya XV — nachala XX vv. Almaty: Zhazushy, 1993.
31. Rakhimbekova A. K. Opyt ehtnokul'turnogo vzaimodejstviya krest'yan-pereselentsev i kazakhov v povsednevnoj zhizni pri obustrojstve zhilischa krest'yan-pereselentsev (vtoraya polovina XIX v.) // Rossiya pod vlast'yu Romanovykh: k 400-letiyu votsareniya: Sb.mat-lov Vseros. nauchno-prakt. konf. / otv. red. Kurseeva O. A. Sterlitamak: Sterlitamakskij filial BashGU, 2013. S. 132—135.
32. Sejdimbek A. Mir kazakhov. Ehtnoul'turologicheskoe pereosmyslenie. Astana: Foliant, 2012. S. 285.
33. Tarikh-i-Rashidi» M. Kh. Dulati o poezdke Said-khana k kazakham Kasym-khana // Materialy po istorii kazakhskikh khanstv v XV—XVIII vv. Alma-Ata: Nauka KazSSR, 1969. S. 225–226.
34. Tilman M. Antropologiya dvizheniya: puti i kommunikatsii // Ural'skij istoricheskij vestnik. 2012. № 12. S. 15—19.
35. Tojnbi A. Postizhenie istorii. M.: Progress, 1991.
36. Tolybekov S. E. Kochevoe obschestvo kazakhov v XVIII — nachale XX vv. Alma-Ata: Izdatel'stvo Nauka Kazakhskoj SSR, 1971. S. 495—594.
37. Ushakin S. Vvedenie k forumu priglashennogo redaktora. O lyudyakh puti: nomadizm segodnya // Ab-Imperio. 2012. № 2. S. 53—82.
38. Khazanov A. Kochevniki i vneshnij mir. Izd. 3-e, dop. Almaty: Dajk-Press, 2002.
39. Ehtkind A. Vnutrennyaya kolonizatsiya. Imperskij opyt Rossii. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. S. 183—188.
40. Yankovskij M. K. Ocherk kolonizatsii Akmolinskoj gubernii // Statisticheskij vestnik. Orenburg, 1924. № 3. S. 71—72.


41. Dmitriev V. V., Lyubichankovskiy S. V. The Southern Periphery of the Russian Empire and a Problem of Colonialism (on materials of National Policy of Russia in Relation to the Crimean Tatars at the end of XVIII — the beginning of the 20th century) // Bylye Gody. 2017. Vol. 45. Is. 3. P. 1010—1024.
42. Dzhundzhuzov S., Lyubichankovskiy S.  Kalmyks of Southern Ural in the 18th – early 20th century: Problems of Assimilation, Acculturation and Preservation of Ethnic Identity // Bylye Gody. 2017. Vol. 46. Is. 4. P. 1194—1206.
43. Guha R. Dominance without Hehegomony. History and Power in Colonial India. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997. 
44. Kendirbaeva G. “We are children of Alash”. The Kazakh intelligentsia at the beginning of the 20th century in search of national identity and prospects of the cultural survival of the Kazakh people // Central Asian Survey. 1999. № 18 (1). R. 5—36.
45. Morrison A. Russian Rule in Samarkand, 1868—1910: A Comparison with British India. Oxford; N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2008. 
46. Rottier P. The Kazakness of sedentarization: promoting progress as tradition in response to the land problem// Central Asian Survey. March, 2003. № 22 (1). P. 67—81.
47. Virginia M.  Law and custon in the Steppe. The Kazakh of the Middle Horde and Russian colonialism in the nineteenth century. Richmond, 2001. R. 35—47

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up