The Constitution of the Russian Federation and the participation of citizens in the administration of justice

 
PIIS013207690002198-9-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690002198-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: The Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 12
Pages30-43
Abstract

The problems of emergence and development of the Institute of judicial assessors and its various sub-institutions, their status and procedural characteristics, the role and importance in the implementation of justice are considered. The important function of civil society, carried out by judicial assessors, on implementation of public control of judicial activity of professional judges in processes with their participation is designated. The expediency of restoration of the subinstitute of people's assessors by means of its adaptation to today's social and economic realities is proved. Proposals are made to improve the institution of judicial assessors as an important link in the mechanism of domestic justice; it is proposed to develop and adopt a Federal law on judicial assessors.

Keywordscourt assessors – arbitration, jury, people, improvement of the mechanism of judicial power, democracy in the implementation of justice
Publication date22.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 270

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Lur'e I.M. Ocherki drevneegipetskogo prava XVI–X vekov do n.eh. Pamyatniki i issledovaniya. L., 1960. S. 108.

2. Kleandrov M.I. Otvetstvennost' sud'i. M., 2011. S. 86.

3. Chel'tsov-Bebutov M.A. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnoprotsessual'nogo prava: ocherki po istorii suda i ugolovnogo protsessa v rabovladel'cheskikh, feodal'nykh i burzhuaznykh gosudarstvakh. SPb., 1995. S. 97.

4. Bojkov A.D. Tret'ya vlast' v Rossii. Ocherki o pravosudii, zakonnosti i sudebnoj reforme 1990–1996 gg. M., 1997. S. 27.

5. Zhil'tsov S.V. Ukaz. soch. (tsit. po: Vestnik Vremennogo pravitel'stva. 1917. № 19/65; Zhurnal Ministerstva yustitsii. 1917. № 4. S. 189).

6. Kutafin O.E., Lebedev V.M., Semigin G.Yu. Sudebnaya vlast' v Rossii: istoriya, dokumenty: v 6 t. T. 5. M., 2003. S.48.

7. Gorbuz A.K., Krasnov M.A., Mishina E.A., Satarov G.V. Transformatsiya rossijskoj sudebnoj vlasti. Opyt kompleksnogo analiza. SPb., 2010. S. 80.

8. Kleandrov M.I. Status arbitrazhnykh, narodnykh i prisyazhnykh zasedatelej: ucheb. posobie. M., 2000. S. 44; Izvestiya. 1997. 25 iyunya.

9. Alebastrova I.A. Obschestvennyj kontrol' za publichnoj vlast'yu v Rossii: bolezni rosta ili zaderzhki razvitiya // Ross. yurid. zhurnal. 2018. № 2(119). S. 11.

10. Fokov A.P. Pravosudie s uchastiem grazhdan v Rossii // Ross. sud'ya. 2009. № 8.

11. Kovalev N. Narodnoe uchastie v otpravlenii pravosudiya v stranakh SNG: sud prisyazhnykh ili sheffenov? // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2006. № 2 (55). S. 16.

12. Parutto S.V., Smirnov V.V. Prisyazhnye i arbitrazhnye zasedateli: teoriya i praktika. M., 2008.

13. Golovko L.V. Teoreticheskie i sravnitel'no-pravovye podkhody k opredeleniyu modeli uchastiya grazhdan k otpravleniyu pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam // Ross. pravosudie. 2015. № 6. S. 23–32.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up