Balance private and public interests in the light of international standards and the Russian constitutional law

 
PIIS013207690001513-6-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690001513-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Law Institute, Siberian Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk
Affiliation: Law Institute, Siberian Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Krasnoyarsk
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 9
Pages52-63
Abstract

The paper shows the relationship between private and public interests according to the doctrine of international and constitutional law. Based on the practice of international treaty bodies and courts and constitutional courts form different countries, the authors argue that the boundaries of the public interest must be prescribe by law, in order to avoid unlawful limitations on rights and freedoms. The assessment criteria must have a scientific grounds. The authors suggest to use the proportionality test, assuming that the Russian Constitutional Court may formulate a clear criteria of balancing private and public interests in order to avoid disproportionate restrictions on human rights and freedoms.

Keywordsthe balance, law, a legitimate aim, limitation of rights and freedoms, public interest, proportionality, the private interest
Received26.10.2018
Publication date31.10.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1814

Readers community rating: 5.0 votes 1

1. Arbuzkin A.M. Chelovek, ego prava i svobody yavlyayutsya vysshej tsennost'yu? // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2016. № 2. S. 18–25.

2. Kryazhkova O.N., Rudt Yu.A. Rasstanovka mest slagaemykh v resheniyakh konstitutsionnykh sudov: pochemu summa menyaetsya? // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2015. № 5.

3. Greer S. “Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: a Contribution to the Habermas-Alexy Debate. Cambridge Law Journal and Contributors. Vol. 63. 2004. Issue 2.

4. McHarg A. Reconciling Human Rights and the Public Interest: Conceptual Problems and Doctrinal Uncertainty in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. The Modern Law Review. Vol. 62. 1999. No. 5.

5. Jackson V.C. Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 119. 2005. No. 1.

6. Grégoire C.N. Webber Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. Vol. 23. 2010. Issue 1.

7. Sullivan D. The Public/Private Distinction in International Human Rights Law. Chapter 15 (p.126–134) in Women's Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives by J.S. Peters (ed.), A. Wolper (ed.). Psychology Press, 1995.

8. Tsakyrakis S. Proportionality: An assault on human rights? International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 7 (3). 2009. URL: http://academic.oup.com/icon/article/7/3/468/703178/ProportionalityAn-assault-on-human-rights

9. Madhav Khosla: Proportionality: An assault on human rights? A reply. International Journal of the Constitutional Law. Vol. 8 (2). 2010. P. 298–306. URL: http://academic.oup.com/icon/article/8/2/298/699984/Proportionality-An-assault-on-human-rights-A-reply

10. Dedov D.M. Konflikt interesov. M., 2004.

11. Dzgoeva B.O. Sootnoshenie chastnykh i publichnykh interesov v pravovom regulirovanii reklamy. M., 2013.

12. Kurbatov A.Ya. Sochetanie chastnykh i publichnykh interesov pri pravovom regulirovanii predprinimatel'skoj deyatel'nosti. M., 2001.

13. Mikhajlov S.V. Kategoriya interesa v rossijskom grazhdanskom prave. M., 2002.

14. Sootnoshenie chastnykh i publichnykh interesov v usloviyakh reformirovaniya zakonodatel'stva Rossijskoj Federatsii / pod obsch. red. O.Yu. Bakaevoj. M., 2010; Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo: priroda i vzaimosvyaz' / pod red. L.A. Andreevoj. Novosibirsk, 2014; Yatsenko T.S. Grazhdansko-pravovaya okhrana publichnykh interesov. M., 2016.

15. Golubtsov V.G. Sochetanie publichnykh i chastnykh nachal v regulirovanii veschnykh otnoshenij s uchastiem gosudarstva. 2-e izd. SPb., 2005.

16. Van Dijk P., Hoof G.J.H., van Hoof G.J.H. Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998.

17. Rivers J. Proportionality and variable intensity of Review. The Cambridge Law Journal. Vol. 65. 2006. Issue 1.

18. Morijn J. Balancing Fundamental Rights and Common Market Freedoms in Union Law: Schmidberger and Omega in the Light of the European Constitution. European Law Journal. Vol. 12. 2006. Issue 1.

19. Christoffersen J. Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights, 2009. Series: International Studies in Human Rights (Book 99).

20. Sharnina L.A. Chastnye i publichnye interesy v konstitutsionnom prave // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2005. № 4.

21. The Paris Minimum Standards of Human Rights Norms in a State of Emergency. London, 1989.

22. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Publichnoe pravo. M., 1995.

23. Kryazhkov A.V. Publichnyj interes: ponyatie i vidy // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1999. № 10.

24. Tot'ev K.Yu. Publichnyj interes v pravovoj doktrine i zakonodatel'stve // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2002. № 9.

25. Lansman et al. v. Finland, U.N. GAOR Human Rights Comm., 58th Sess., Communication No. 671/1995 at para. 10.5, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/58/D/671/1995 (1996).

26. Benvinisti E. Margin of appreciation, consensus, and universal standard. International Law and Politics. Vol. 31.

27. Sitdikova R.I. Chastnyj, publichnyj i obschestvennyj interes v avtorskom prave // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2012. № 2.

28. Mazaev V.D. Ponyatie i konstitutsionnye printsipy publichnoj sobstvennosti: ucheb. posobie. M., 2004.

29. Vasil'eva M.I. Publichnye interesy v ehkologicheskom prave. M., 2003.

30. Kabanova I.E. Printsip balansa chastnykh i publichnykh interesov v doktrine i pravoprimenitel'noj praktike // Vlast' zakona. 2016. № 2.

31. Kozlova V.N. Ponyatie publichnykh i chastnykh interesov i ikh sootnoshenie // Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2011. № 7.

32. Kontseptsiya chastnogo i publichnogo prava Rossii / pod red. V.I. Ivanova, Yu.S. Kharitonovoj. M., 2013.

33. Umanskaya V.P. Balans publichnykh i chastnykh interesov v administrativnom prave // Vlast' zakona. 2017. № 1.

34. Schennikova L.V. Grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie: publichnye interesy, obschie pol'zy, dobrye nravy. M., 2015.

35. Gadzhiev G.A. Pravovye pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo suda RF o garantiyakh prava chastnoj sobstvennosti pri prinuditel'nom otchuzhdenii imuschestva dlya gosudarstvennykh nuzhd // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2008. № 1.

36. Matejkovich M.S., Gorbunov V.A. Zakonnyj interes v konstitutsionnom prave Rossijskoj Federatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2006. № 5.

37. Harris D., O'Boyle M., Bates E. and Harris C.B. O’Boyle and Warbick Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. Third ed. Oxford, 2014.

38. Clements L.J, Mole N., Simmons A. European Human Rights. Taking a Case under the Convention. London, 1999.

39. Dzhenis M., Kehj R., Brehdli Eh. Evropejskoe pravo v oblasti prav cheloveka (Praktika i kommentarii) / per s angl. M., 1997.

40. Barak A. Proportionality: constitutional rights and their limitations. Cambridge, U.K.; New York, 2012.

41. Grimm D. Proportionality in Canadian and Germany Constitutional Jurisprudence. University of Toronto Law Journal (2007).

42. Carss-Frisk M. The right to property: A guide to the implementation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe, 2003.

43. Vasil'eva S.V. Otrazhenie publichnykh i chastnykh interesov v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii // Interes v publichnom i chastnom prave: materialy nauch. konf. 21 noyabrya 2002 g. / pod red. Yu.A. Tikhomirova i dr. M., 2002.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up