METHODOLOGICAL INDIVIDUALISM AND LEGAL REGULATION OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

 
PIIS102694520028567-4-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520028567-4
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Business and Corporate Law, Deputy Head of the Department of Business and Corporate Law
Affiliation: Russian state University of Justice
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

An adequate and flexible impact of law on the economy is impossible without differentiation of legal regulation. At the same time, the legal regime for the activities of persons must be determined by their individual economic characteristics. The philosophical basis for constructing such legal regulation, which could consider the economic characteristics of individuals, is methodological individualism. Within the framework of methodological individualism, it is assumed that the study of social processes should begin with the study of the behavior of individual individuals. In addition, legal influence on society (in particular, on the economy) is possible only through legal influence on the behavior of individuals engaged in economic activity. From the standpoint of methodological individualism, many problems of law can be rethought. In particular, the article examines the functional approach to the construction of legal norms, thanks to which the hypotheses of norms take into account economic characteristics that can individualize participants in economic activity; arguments are made in favor of the fact that the subject of legal regulation is (economic) activity; the use of deontic operators in legal norms and the classical definition of the concept of legal status are criticized; provides a new look at the theory of legal facts.

Keywordsmethodological individualism, social institutions, economic activity, economic characteristics, legal regulation, legal regime, differentiation, deontic operators, legal status, legal facts.
Received16.11.2023
Number of characters40041
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

1. Ben-Shahar O., Porat A. Personalized Law: Different Rules for Different People. Oxford University Press, 2021. 244 p.

2. Udéhn L. The Changing Face of Methodological Individualism // Annual Review of Sociology. 2002. № 28. P. 479-507.

3. Załuski W. Game Theory in Jurisprudence. Copernicus Center Press, 2013. 353 p.

4. Andreev V.K. Yuridicheskie litsa kak sub'ekty ehkonomicheskoj deyatel'nosti // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2016. № 5. S. 35-44.

5. Bentam I. Vvedenie v osnovaniya nravstvennosti i zakonodatel'stva. M.: Rossijskaya politicheskaya ehntsiklopediya (ROSSPEhN), 1998. 415 s.

6. Bratus' S.N. O roli sovetskogo prava v razvitii proizvodstvennykh otnoshenij. M.: Znanie, 1954. 24 s.

7. Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: Per. s nem. / Sost., obsch. red. i poslesl. Yu. N. Davydova; Predisl. P.P. Gajdenko. M.: Progress, 1990. 808 s.

8. Vlasenko N.A. Individualizatsiya kak zakonomernost' razvitiya sovremennogo rossijskogo zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2015. № 12. S. 11-17.

9. Karapetov A.G. Ehkonomicheskij analiz prava. M.: Statut, 2016. 528 s.

10. Kirpichev A.E. Predprinimatel'skie obyazatel'stva sub'ektov publichnogo sektora ehkonomiki: Dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2018. 499 s.

11. Kulakov V.V. Slozhnye obyazatel'stva v grazhdanskom prave: Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. M. RAP, 2011. 42 s.

12. Kurbatov A.Ya. Predprinimatel'skoe pravo: problemy teorii i pravoprimeneniya: monografiya. M.: Yustitsinform, 2022. 244 s.

13. Laptev V.V. Predprinimatel'skoe (khozyajstvennoe) pravo i real'nyj sektor ehkonomiki. M.: Infotropik Media, 2010. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».

14. Makkaj I. Pravo i ehkonomika dlya kontinental'noj pravovoj traditsii / per. s angl. pod nauch. red. D. Raskova. M.: Izdatel'skij dom «Delo» RANKhiGS, 2019. 624 s.

15. Mizes L. fon. Chelovecheskaya deyatel'nost': traktat po ehkonomicheskoj teorii / per. s 3-go ispr. angl. izd. A.V. Kuryaeva. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium, 2005. 878 s.

16. Momdzhyan K.Kh. K voprosu o konstruirovanii sotsial'noj real'nosti // Filosofskij zhurnal / Philosophy Journal. 2021. T. 14. № 4. S. 38–52.

17. Odintsova M.I. Ehkonomika prava: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Yurajt, 2020. 345 s.

18. Panin S.D. Teoriya prinyatiya reshenij i raspoznavanie obrazov. Kurs lektsij: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Izdatel'stvo MPU im. N.Eh. Baumana, 2017. 239 s.

19. Pravovoe regulirovanie ehkonomicheskoj deyatel'nosti: edinstvo i differentsiatsiya: monografiya / otv. red. I.V. Ershova, A.A. Mokhov. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2019. 464 s.

20. Prokof'ev A.V. Obosnovanie morali i obosnovanie utilitarizma v ehtike Ieremii Bentama // Filosofskij zhurnal. 2023.T. 16. № 1. S. 5–20.

21. Ryskel'dieva L.T. O deontologii, dolzhenstvovanii i ehstetizme // Filosofskij zhurnal. 2022. T. 15. № 1. S. 147–160.

22. Tolstoj Yu.K. K teorii pravootnosheniya // Izbrannye trudy o sobstvennosti i pravootnosheniyakh / sost. i vstup. stat'i A. A. Ivanova. Izd. 2-e, dopolnennoe. M.: Izdatel'skaya gruppa «Zakon», 2022. 1038 s.

23. Tri poezdki Il'i Muromtsa // Russkie byliny. Vyp. 1. Bogatyri kievskie. M.: Tovarischestvo tipografii A.I. Mamontova, 1904. 149 s.

24. Foss A.Eh. Suschnost' matematiki. Per. s nem. Izd. 3-e. M.: Knizhnyj dom «LIBRIKOM», 2009. 117 s.

25. Khajek F. Individualizm i ehkonomicheskij poryadok / per. s angl. O.A. Dmitrievoj pod red. R.I. Kapelyushnikova. M.; Chelyabinsk: Sotsium, 2016. 424 s.

26. Shastitko A.E., Tutov L.A. Zametki o metodologicheskom individualizme v ehkonomicheskikh issledovaniyakh: est' li granitsy primeneniya? // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ehkonomika. 2023. № 1. S. 3-21.

27. Ehlias N. Obschestvo individov / Per. s nem. M.: Praksis, 2001. 336 s.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up