Prosecutor in the court debate of the parties in the criminal process of the Russian Empire

 
PIIS102694520023539-3-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520023539-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Lawyer of the Donetsk Regional Bar Association
Affiliation: Donetsk Regional Bar Association
Address: Donetsk, 13 Shakespeare str.,
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 6
Pages169-177
Abstract

The article analyzes the legal status and the actual role of the prosecutor in the judicial debate of the parties in the criminal process of the Russian Empire. The overall result of the consideration of the criminal case largely depends on this part of the trial. And the study of historical experience is necessary for a better understanding and solution of the problems of modern criminal procedure, which is based on many principles established by the judicial reform of 1864. The judicial debates were a manifestation of the new principle of adversarial in criminal process. In their accusatory speeches, the prosecutors often not only went beyond the established limits of the debate, but also did not comply with moral requirements in relation to defendants and defenders. In some cases, there were conflicts between prosecutors and defense lawyers in the trial, and the most gross violations of the rules of conduct by the parties of the debate led to the cancellation of the verdicts by the Governing Senate. At the initial stage after the judicial and military-judicial reforms, the prosecutors in court were correct and unbiased. However, in the 1880s, the tendency of their accusatory bias increased, mainly in political cases

Keywordsjudicial reform, adversarial, court, prosecutor, defender, jurors, judicial investigation, court debate, accusatory speech, Governing Senate
Received08.12.2022
Publication date30.06.2023
Number of characters32048
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 167

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gradovsky G. More about the Prosecutor’s Office // Judicial gaz. 1883. No. 19. P. 5 (in Russ.).

2. Ivanenko L.G. Accusatory speech // Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1914. No. 2. P. 52 - 54, 57, 59–61 (in Russ.).

3. Kazantsev S.M. History of the Tsarist Prosecutor's Office. SPb., 1993. P. 164 (in Russ.).

4. Kalinkin Yu. A. Criminal proceedings in the district courts of the Russian Empire. M., 2009. P. 132 (in Russ.).

5. Kozlinina E.I. For half a century. 1862 - 1912.: memoirs, essays and characteristics. M., 1913. P. 132, 133, 163, 164, 177 - 179, 285, 286, 331, 332, 351, 352, 386, 400 (in Russ.).

6. Koni A.F. Course of criminal proceedings. M., 2011. P. 159 (in Russ.).

7. Koni A.F. Moral principles in criminal proceedings // Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1902. No. 1. P. 29, 30 (in Russ.).

8. Koni A.F. Collected works: in 8 vols, 1967. Vol. 1. P. 351, 352; vol. 2. P. 59, 312; vol. 4. S. 61, 124 - 129, 134, 135, 144, 158, 159, 163, 189 - 191, 193 - 195 (in Russ.).

9. Koni A.F. Judicial speeches. 4th ed. St. Petersburg, 1905. P. 34 (in Russ.).

10. Koni A.F. Participation of the prosecutor in the final debate on the judicial investigation. (Commentary to Articles 738 - 740 U. U. S.) // Bulletin of Law. 1915. No. 20. P. 603 (in Russ.).

11. Levenstim A. Speech of the state prosecutor in the criminal court. Etude. SPb., 1894. P. 1, 3, 98 (in Russ.).

12. N.N.O. From the notes of the juror // Historical Bulletin. 1898. Vol. 74. P. 201, 202 (in Russ.).

13. Nikitin V. Petersburg jury trial (observations and impressions of a juror) // Domestic notes. 1871. No. 5 - 6. Ed. I. S. 380, 385 (in Russ.).

14. Revolutionary journalism of the seventies. The first appendix to the collections “State Crimes in Russia”, ed. by B. Bazilevsky. Paris, 1905. P. 471, 474 (in Russ.).

15. Speeches of prosecutors of the Russian Empire / V.V. Lavrov, N.M. Ivanova, A.V. Eremin, G.K. Zhukov, N.V. Kulik. SPb., 2020. P. 18. URL: https://www.procuror.spb.ru/izdanija/300years2.pdf (in Russ.).

16. Skripitsyn V.A. The defendants (From the memoirs of the defender). St. Petersburg, 1890. P. 157, 158 (in Russ.).

17. Sobolevsky V.A. Justice and legal order in the military. St. Petersburg, 1882. P. 306 (in Russ.).

18. Spassky P.L. On criminal proceedings in district courts. Practical guide. Simbirsk, 1882. P. 167, 169 (in Russ.).

19. Tager A.S. Tsarist Russia and the Beilis case. 2nd ed. / with a preface by A.V. Lunacharsky. M., 1934. P. 233, 234, 278 (in Russ.).

20. Telesnitsky V. On the question of the weakness of the prosecution, compared with the defense, in our district courts // Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. 1888. No. 5. P. 54 (in Russ.).

21. Troitsky N.A. Madness of the brave. Russian revolutionaries and the punitive policy of tsarism. 1866–1882. M., 1978. P. 22, 78, 189, 190, 192, 251 (in Russ.).

22. The military-judicial Statute, clarified and supplemented by the motives that served as its basis and caused its subsequent changes / comp. N. Martynov. 6th ed. St. Petersburg, 1894. P. 277 (in Russ.).

23. Shveykovsky P.A. Military-judicial Statute (St. Military. Post. 1869, book XXIV. ed. 4). St. Petersburg, 1914. P. XXXIII, 690 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up