Effectiveness of Grant Support for Russian Socially-Oriented Non-Profit Organizations (the Case of the Presidential Grants Fundation)

Publication type Article
Status Published
Occupation: Vice-rector for strategic communications
Affiliation: Kostroma State University
Address: Russian Federation, Kostroma
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 9

The article analyzes grant distribution system of the Presidential Grants Foundation, the leading grant operator in Russia. The article is based on a study of over 12.000 grant applications of the winners of the 2017-2020 Foundation's competition. The author views nonprofit organizations as effective actors in the social service market and the Presidential Grants Foundation policies as an impulse to their development and also as a social mechanism overcoming «market failures». The key content of the article is a description and an analysis of dysfunctional practices in the Foundation activity and grant distribution. In author's opinion, aforesaid dysfunctional practices tend to turn into factors that hinder development of the nonprofit sector. First, there is an uneven grant distribution among the regions of the Russian Federation, as well as a disparity in the amount of grants allocated by the Foundation. Second, inadequate evaluation system of grant applications does not allow to reasonably differentiate grant applications by their content, uniqueness, and social impact. Third, an unintended repetition of negative mechanisms in the Foundation's activity discourages non-profit organizations from additional fund-raising for their activity and also from diversifying their financial sources. It is concluded that the grant policy of the Presidential Grants Foundation is discrete, does not follow a unified logic, and is not based on a systematic analysis of the dynamic changes within organizations of the «third» sector.

Keywordssocially-oriented non-profit organizations, Presidential grants Fund, grant, dysfunctions
Publication date21.09.2020
Number of characters34004
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1127

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Мартынов М.Ю. Социально-ориентированные некоммерческие предприятия – обретение легитимности? // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 10. C. 83–93. [Martynov M.Y. (2019) Socially oriented non-profit organizations – acquiring legitimacy? Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No.10: 83–93. (In Russ.)]

2. Мерсиянова И.В., Иванова Н.В. Партнерство государства и благотворительных фондов как стратегия повышения ресурсной обеспеченности некоммерческих организаций // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2018. № 1. С. 29–46 [Mersiyanova I.V., Ivanova N.V. (2018) Partnership of the state and charitable foundations as a strategy for increasing the resources of non-profit organizations. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya [Public Administration Issues]. No. 1: 29–46. (In Russ.)]

3. Смирнов В.А. Проектная деятельность российских некоммерческих организаций: ключевые проблемы и противоречия // Социологические исследования. 2016. № 2. С. 62–69 [Smirnov V.A. (2016) Project activity of Russian non-profit organizations: key problems and contradictions. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 62–69. (In Russ.)]

4. Суслова С.В. Некоммерческие производители на региональных квазирынках социальных услуг // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2014. № 3. C. 72–89. [Suslova S.V. (2014) Nonprofit providers on regional social service quasi-market. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i municipal'nogo upravleniya [Public Administration Issues]. No. 3: 72–89. (In Russ.)]

5. Andreoni J., Payne A. (2011) Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities. Journal of Public Economics. No. 95 (Iss. 5–6): 334–343.

6. Becchetti L., Bruni L., Zamagni S. (2020) The Microeconomics of Wellbeing and Sustainability. Recasting the Economic Process. Academic Press.

7. Eikenberry A., Kluver J. (2004) The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review. No. 64: 132–140.

8. Horne C., Johnson J., Van Slyke D.M. (2005). Do charitable donors know enough–and care enough–about government subsidies to affect private giving to nonprofit organizations? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. No. 34 (1): 136–149.

9. Kitchen H. (2005) Delivering Local/Municipal Services. In: Public Services Delivery. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.

10. Rose-Ackerman S. (2004) Governance and Corruption. In: B. Lomborg, (ed.), Global Crises, Global Solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11. Salamon L.M., Hems L.C., Chinnock K. (2000) The Nonprofit Sector: For What and for Whom? Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, No. 37: 35–99.

12. Sokolowski S.W. (2013) Effects of Government Support of Nonprofit Institutions on Aggregate Private Philanthropy: Evidence from 40 Countries. Voluntas. No. 24: 359–381.

Система Orphus