Expansion of the network of state legal bureaus to protect the rights of socially unprotected citizens: for or against?

 
PIIS102694520020483-2-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520020483-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: senior researcher, Civil Law and civil procedure Department
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 6
Pages180-184
Abstract

The article analyzes the arguments of representatives of the legal community against the widespread creation of state legal bureaus in all subjects of the Russian Federation to provide free legal assistance and protect the rights of socially unprotected citizens. The fears mentioned in them are recognized as insignificant. It is concluded that the existence in Russia of a mixed model of legal assistance (lawyer and HUB) has more advantages than the possible negative consequences indicated in the negative arguments given. With this in mind, some proposals were made to improve the legal regulation of the activities of state legal bureaus, increasing the level of protection of their participants.

Keywordsstate legal bureau, protection, rights, socially unprotected citizens, lawyer, free legal assistance, chatbot, responsibility, state control, internet
Received08.02.2022
Publication date20.06.2022
Number of characters18454
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 416

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gorovtsova M. In 2022, the federal state information system “Legal Aid” will appear [Electronic resource]. — Access mode: https://www.garant.ru/news/1463018/ (accessed: 04.02.2022) (in Russ.).

2. Dzotov Ch. A. State legal bureau or advocacy? // Young scientist. 2011. No. 7 (30). Vol. 2. p. 10–15 (in Russ.).

3. Efimovich E., Sobolev S. 6 million Russians under 55 have not recently used the Internet [Electronic resource]. — Access mode: https://www.rbc.ru/newspaper/2020/09/23/5f69e8209a794751dd22b98d (accessed: 01/28/2022) (in Russ.).

4. Zalutskaya I.A. Creation and activity of state legal bureaus // Law enforcement monitoring. 2012. No. 3. P. 14 (in Russ.).

5. Nilus G.N. The system of legal assistance to the poor needs to be improved // Lawyer. 2006. No. 1. P. 11 (in Russ.).

6. Stetsovsky Yu. I. Nationalization of the bar is incompatible with law. Legal nature of advocacy // Lawyer. - 2007. No. 7. P. 8–16 (in Russ.).

7. Trifonova E. The Ministry of Justice takes the first step towards the state advocacy [Electronic resource]. — Access mode: https://www.ng.ru/politics/2021-05-16/3_8148_lawyers.html (accessed: 01.02.2022) (in Russ.).

8. Usoltseva N.A., Usoltsev Yu. M. Chatbot as an element of legal reality // Legal Science. 2020. No. 9 [Electronic resource]. — Access mode: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/chat-bot-kak-element-pravovoy-realnosti (accessed: 28.01.2022). (in Russ.).

9. Rhudy R. Description and Analysis of Legal Aid Models // Legal Aid Models for Latin America [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: http://www.gsdrc. org/go/display/document/legacyid/452 (accessed: 08.02.2022).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up