Impact of the concept of “technoscience” on the genesis features of the legal regu-lation of artificial intelligence and robotics technology

 
PIIS102694520019169-6-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520019169-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Managing Director of the AI Regulation Center of PJSC Sberbank, Founder of the Research Center “Robopravo”, senior researcher at the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation,
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 3
Pages108-116
Abstract

The paper is devoted to studying the legal regulation genesis of innovative AI and RT in law. The research suggests comprehending not only the answer to the question why these technologies can be considered as “disruptive” ones for the legal system, but also why this is happening right now, decades after their appearance. It is concluded that AI and RT are closely related to the concept of “technoscience” since due to them we can talk about interdisciplinarity, mutual strengthening of scientific cognition; capitalization; the growing influence of corporations on science; and the logical consequence is the involvement of technoscience in the state policy orbit. At the same time, technoscience brings social and cultural paradigms of scientific research to a new level as it allows us to raise the question of scientists’ attitude towards the consequences of their inventions in a new way. This, in turn, determines a number of the genesis features of AI and RT in law which are justified in the article.

Keywordsartificial intelligence, robot, robotics technology, regulation genesis, legal regulation, technoscience, scientific and technological progress, technology, law.
AcknowledgmentThe article has been made possible by and published under RFBR grant 18-29-16015 dedicated to the comprehensive study of legal and ethical aspects of the development and use of artificial intelligence systems.
Received20.05.2021
Publication date29.03.2022
Number of characters28407
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 437

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alekseev S.S. Collected works issued: in 10 vols. M., 2010. Vol. 6: Ascent to Law (in Russ.).

2. Bakanova E.A. Transformation of science in the information society // Philosophy and culture. 2017. No. 4. P. 80–88 (in Russ.).

3. Baranov P.P. Legal regulation of robotics technology and artificial intelligence in Russia: some approaches to solving the problem // North Caucasian Legal Herald. 2018. No. 1 (in Russ.).

4. Beilin M.V. Nanotechnoscience: between the theoretical and practical purposes of scientific thinking // Scientific Herald of BelSU. Series: Philosophy. Sociology. Law. 2016. Is. 38. No. 24 (245). P. 145–148 (in Russ.).

5. Berdyaev N.A. Man and Machine (the problem of sociology and metaphysics of technology) // Journal “The Way”. No. 38 (for 05.1933). URL: http://www.odinblago.ru/path/38/1 (in Russ.).

6. Bryanik N.V. E. Husserl on the meaning of science in the scope of modern philosophy and science history // Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2017. No. 4. P. 51–60 (in Russ.).

7. Chernyshov I.A. Technoscientific model of modern technical knowledge // Society: philosophy, history, culture. 2018. No. 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tehnonauchnaya-model-sovremennogo-tehnicheskogo-znaniya/viewer (in Russ.).

8. Gadzhiev G.A. Is the robot agent a person? (Search for legal forms for regulating the digital economy) // Russian Law Journal. 2018. No 1. P. 15–30 (in Russ.).

9. Gorokhov V.G. Technology and Science // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2012. Vol. XXXIV. No. 4. P. 5–17 (in Russ.).

10. Gorokhov V.G. Technoscience as a new stage in the development of modern science and technology // Higher education in Russia. 2014. No. 11. P. 37–47 (in Russ.).

11. Husserl E. Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. St. Petersburg, 2004 (in Russ.).

12. Iriskina E. N., Belyakov K. O. Legal aspects of civil liability for causing harm by the actions of a robot as a quasi-subject of civil law relations // Humanitarian Informatics. 2016. No. 10. P. 63–72 (in Russ.).

13. Khabrieva T. Ya., Chernogor N.N. The Law in the conditions of digital reality // Russian Law Journal. 2018. No 1. P. 85–102 (in Russ.).

14. Koshovets О.B., Frolov I.E. Brave new world: On science transformation into technoscience // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2020. Vol. 51. No. 1. P. 20–30 (in Russ.).

15. Kotlyarova V.V. Modern scientific cognition: paradigm of integration // Historical, philosophical, political and law sciences, culturology and study of art. Questions of theory and practice. Tambov, 2015. No. 9 (59): in 2 parts. Part. I. P. 99–102 (in Russ.).

16. Kozhevnikov N.N., Danilova V.S. Ontologic and epistemological aspects of modern philosophy // Vestnik of NEFU. 2012. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 69–75 (in Russ.).

17. Ladygina I.V. Philosophical foundations of robotics technology // Humanitarian Vector. 2016. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 28–35 (in Russ.).

18. Lebedev S.A. Three epistemological paradigms: classical, non-classical and post-non-classical // Herald of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Philosophical Sciences. 2019. No. 2. P. 8–21 (in Russ.).

19. Moiseeva A.P. On the question of the essence of the study of technoscience // Modern problems of science and education. 2015. No. 1 (Part I). URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_25325522_67912728.pdf (in Russ.).

20. Moiseeva A.P., Bakanova E.A. Phenomenon of technoscience // Bulletin of Science of Siberia. 2017. No. 2 (25). P. 45–58 (in Russ.).

21. Nosov S.I. Law and informatization // Lawyer. 2019. No. 4. URL: https://urfac.ru/?p=2369 (in Russ.).

22. Osipov V.E., Vasenkin A.V. System of social and ethical bases of technoscience // Modern technologies. System analysis. Modeling. 2012. No. 4 (36). P. 255–259 (in Russ.).

23. Pisarenko A.P., Ignatenko V.V. To the question of the “inhuman” law: trends and prospects // Herald of the Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics. 2018. No. 1. P. 55–58 (in Russ.).

24. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: how it will change life and prevent people from becoming rich. M., 2016 (in Russ.).

25. Seredkina E.V. Ethical and epistemological aspects of technoscientific knowledge in the context of paradigmatic shift from the homo faber into the homo creator // Humanitarian vector. Series: Philosophy, Cultural Studies. 2016. No. 1. P. 41–45 (in Russ.).

26. Skinner K. Digital Man. The fourth revolution in human history that will affect everyone. M., 2019 (in Russ.).

27. Somenkov S.A. Artificial intelligence: from object to subject? // Herald of Kutafin University. 2019. No. 2 (in Russ.).

28. Varkhotov T.A. Technoscience – science without scientists? // Epistemology & philosophy of science. 2020. Vol. 51. No. 1. P. 32–36 (in Russ.).

29. Vyzhletsov G.P. Scientific rationality in the era of axiological relativism // Herald of St. Petersburg University. Ser. 17. 2015. No. 4. P. 21–26 (in Russ.).

30. Zaporozhets A.M. Legal Aspects of the Innovative Economics of Russia // Scientific forums. 2014’2(1). P. 53–77 (in Russ.).

31. Borgesius F. Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making. URL: https://rm.coe.int/discrimination-artificial-intelligence-and-algorithmic-decision-making/1680925d73

32. Wardle C., Derakhshan H. Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. URL: https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html

33. Yeung K. A study of the implications of advanced digital technologies (including AI systems) for the concept of responsibility within a human rights framework. URL: https://rm.coe.int/draft-study-of-the-implications-of-advanced-digital-technologies-inclu/16808ef255

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up