Inventions created by artificial intelligence software: problems of law enforcement

 
PIIS102694520017527-0-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520017527-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of legal regulation of economic activity of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Affiliation: Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIsuue 11
Pages90-99
Abstract

The article analyzes the issue of determining the author and patent holder of an invention created by artificial intelligence software. The problem of determining the authorship of objects of patent law created by artificial intelligence is considered from two sides: the definition of the author of an individual under the guidance and control of which artificial intelligence has achieved a patentable result, and the recognition of the status of the inventor for the artificial intelligence itself due to the creative nature of the inventive process.

It is proved that the definition of the behavior of artificial intelligence by setting the problem and giving the necessary instructions for its solution leads to the recognition of the person giving such instructions as the inventor of the result, and artificial intelligence makes only a means to achieve the result.

It is concluded that in order to recognize the author of artificial intelligence software as the inventor of the result developed by such artificial intelligence, it is not enough for the author to take an indirect part by "training" artificial intelligence algorithms and determining the identified errors in their work. The unpredictability and non-obviousness of the decision-making process by artificial intelligence for the programmer does not allow him to recognize the inventor of the results created by the software.

At this stage of the development of artificial intelligence technology, the process of creating an invention by artificial intelligence is proposed to be considered as a revision of the parameters and characteristics existing in this field of technology, and the implementation of a choice from certain categories.

Keywordsinvention, scientific and technical results, exclusive right, artificial intelligence, user, author, patent holder, specialist, inventive level
Received23.04.2021
Publication date03.12.2021
Number of characters35106
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 457

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bliznets I.A., Leontiev K.B. Copyright and related rights: studies / ed. by I.A. Gemini. M., 2019. P. 143 (in Russ.).

2. Vitko V. Analysis of scientific ideas about the author and the rights to the results of artificial intelligence // Copyright and related rights. 2019. No. 2. P. 5 - 20; No. 3. P. 5 - 22 (in Russ.).

3. Ponomareva D.V., Barabashev A.G. Patent protection of scientific results and artificial intelligence: problems and challenges // Law and the digital economy. 2020. No. 3. P. 36 - 43 (in Russ.).

4. Safin R.R., Maskin K.A., Povarov Yu. S. Legal regulation of copyright objects created using the “neural network” // Legal regulation of intellectual property and innovation activity: collection of articles of scientific methodical seminar. M., 2018. P. 157 (in Russ.).

5. Trofimenko A.V. Intangible objects in civil legal relations. Saratov, 2004 (in Russ.).

6. Kharitonova Yu. S., Savina V.S. Artificial intelligence technology and Law: Challenges of modernity // Herald of the Perm University. Legal sciences. 2020. No. 3. P. 524–549 (in Russ.).

7. Abbott R. The Artificial Inventor Project // WIPO Magazine. 2019. No. (6). P. 8 - 13.

8. Aubin Camille. Intelligence artificielle et brevets // Cahiers de Propriété Intellectuelle. 2018. No. 30 (3). P. 947 - 984.

9. Crowne Emir. Payment of Patent Maintenance Fees Merely Mechanical // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2009. No. 4 (8). P. 529 - 532.

10. Sugimoto C.R., Ekbia H.R., Mattioli M. Big Data Is Not a Monolith. MIT Press, 2016. P.º187 - 198.

11. World Economic Forum. Artificial Intelligence Collides with Patent Law. White Paper for the Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, avril 2018. Р. 6. URL: WEF_48540_WP_End_of_Innovation_Protecting_Patent_Law.pdf (weforum.org) (accessed: 21.04.2021).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up