All
 
|
 
 


On the directions of improving the mechanism of judicial power in ensuring the fairness of justice
 
PIIS102694520014034-8-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520014034-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Mikhail I. Kleandrov 
Occupation: Chief researcher of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 3
Pages7-23
Abstract

The problems of improving the mechanism of fairer justice are considered. The author is convinced that justice is a feeling, and it is not formalized, it is subjective, and therefore it is impossible to induce (force, etc.) a judge to make more just judicial acts. But it is possible to legislate, organizationally and scientifically (that is, from the outside) to ensure that the judge more fully realizes his sense of justice in the administration of justice. The article examines the problems of selecting candidates for judges who are initially predisposed to commit more just actions; collective intelligence in the judicial process, which provides a fairer justice than that of a single judge; deep specialization throughout the entire vertical of the judicial system, based on the premise that a judge specializing in a narrow category of cases becomes a high-level professional, therefore, the judicial acts rendered by him are more fair

Keywordsmechanism of justice, justice, judge, judicial proceedings
Received12.12.2020
Publication date23.03.2021
Number of characters64593
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 691

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Amosov S.M. To the question of free justice // State and Law. 2020. No. 10. P. 137 (in Russ.).
2. Vas’kovsky E.V. Textbook of civil procedure. M., 2003. P. 431 (in Russ.).
3. Vladykina T.A. Theoretical model of proceedings in criminal cases considered by a court with the participation of jurors: abstract ... Doctor of Law. Yekaterinburg, 2018 (in Russ.).
4. Volkova S.V. Democracy of Athens and the power of Sparta // PLATON. 2017. No. 2. P. 10 - 19 (in Russ.).
5. Voskobitova L.A. Subject area of judicial power and types of legal proceedings // Judicial power and criminal process. 2017. No. 1. P. 59 - 67 (in Russ.).
6. Golovko L.V. Theoretical and comparative legal approaches to determining the model of participation of citizens in the administration of justice in criminal cases // Russ. justice. 2015. No. 6. P. 23–32 (in Russ.).
7. Gorban’ V.S., Savenkov D.A. Judicial System: state and current trends in the development of the system of courts of general jurisdiction in Germany (scientific commentary on the Law of the Federal Republic of Germany "On the Judicial System"). Saratov, 2019. P. 23 (in Russ.).
8. Grebnev R. On the question of the principles of system construction of judicial bodies in the Russian Federation. XXI century. 2016. No. 1 (38). P. 44 - 50 (in Russ.).
9. Gudym V.N. Prospects for the development of specialization of judges in the modern Russian judicial system // Judicial practice of Western Siberia. 2014. No. 4 (20). P. 20 - 26 (in Russ.).
10. Zhiltsov S.V. Legal status of the world court in the period of Russian revolutions (1905 - 1917) // Evolution of Russian and foreign law. To the 80th anniversary of the Department of history of state and law of the Ural state Law University (1936 - 2016): collection of scientific works. Vol. III: Evolution of the Russian state and Law, teachings on the Russian state and law in the works - congratulations of colleagues / ed. be A.S. Smykalin. Ekaterinburg, 2016. P. 390 (in Russ.).
11. Zaikin S. Justice: in search of perfection. New formation of the judicial system // Comparative Constitutional Review. 2014. No. 3 (100). P. 54 - 71; No. 4 (101). P. 118 - 144; No. 5 (102). P. 109 - 129; No. 6 (103). P. 110 - 122 (in Russ.).
12. Zamyshlyaev D.M. Types of court jurisdiction: a comparative legal and historical approach: dis. ... PhD in Law (in Russ.).
13. Karpov N.N. Justice as a characteristic of the object of constitutional and legal relations // Herald of the University of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation. 2019. No. 2 (70). P. 59 - 64 (in Russ.).
14. Kleandrov M.I. On mentoscoping and other absolute proofs in criminal proceedings // State and Law. 2019. No. 9. P. 7–16 (in Russ.).
15. Kleandrov M.I. On the model of radical autonomization of world justice in the Russian Federation // Journal of Russ. law. 2015. No. 3 (219). P. 31 - 42 (in Russ.).
16. Kleandrov M.I. Judicial Corps of Russia: improving the mechanism of formation. M., 2019 (in Russ.).
17. Komorida A. Court with the participation of court assessors: a new system of participation of citizens in the administration of justice // Criminal proceedings. 2012. No. 3 (in Russ.).
18. Korobka E. The appeal overturned almost 90% of the acquittals of district courts rendered with the participation of jurors. 2020. 13 Oct. (in Russ.).
19. Lectorsky V.A. Law may not be contrary to the ideal of justice // Philosophy of Law at the beginning of XXI century through the prism of constitutionalism and constitutional Economics. M., 2010. P. 90–93 (in Russ.).
20. New philosophical encyclopedia: in 4 vols. M., 2001. Vol. 3. P. 622 - 624 (the author - A.A. Guseynov) (in Russ.).
21. Panko N.K. Conscience as a necessary condition for assessing evidence in a criminal case // Judicial power and criminal process. 2016. No. 2. P. 204 - 209 (in Russ.).
22. Prokudina L.A. Institute of Arbitration assessors – unrealized opportunities of the business community // Entrepreneurial Law. 2016. No. 2 (in Russ.).
23. Rawls J. A theory of justice / transl. from English.: V. Tselishchev, V. Karpovich, A. Shevchenko. Novosibirsk, 1995 (in Russ.).
24. Savenkov A.N. Philosophy of Law, legal thinking and global problems of modern civilization // Transformation of the paradigm of law in the civilizational development of mankind: reports of members of the Russian Academy of Sciences / under the general ed. of A.N. Savenkov. M., 2019. P. 9 (in Russ.).
25. Standards of fair justice (international and national practices). M., 2012 (in Russ.).
26. Strelkova Yu. V. Verdict of jurors in criminal proceedings: theoretical foundations and law enforcement practice: abstract ... PhD in Law. M., 2018 (in Russ.).
27. Judicial systems of Europe and Eurasia: scientific and encyclopedic ed.: in 3 vols. / ed. by R.A. Kurbanov and R.A. Gurbanov. M., 2019. Vol. 1. Western and Northern Europe. P. 46, 47, 76; vol. 2. Southern and Eastern Europe. P. 145; vol. 3. Eurasia. P. 341, 342, 367 (Ser. "Judicial systems of the world states") (in Russ.).
28. Trofimova E. The judicial system saved on jurors // Nezavisimaya gazeta. 2020. 27 Nov. (in Russ.).
29. Philosophy of Law. Dictionary / general ed. and comp. V.N. Zhukov. M., 2020. P. 660 (in Russ.).
30. Harari Yu. N. Homo Deus. A brief history of the future / transl. from English by A. Andreeva. M., 2020. P. 377, 378 (in Russ.).
31. Cheltsov-Bebutov M.A. Course of Soviet criminal procedure law: essays on the history of the court and criminal procedure in slave-owning, feudal and bourgeois states. SPb., 1995. P. 97 (in Russ.).
32. Chernenko A.K. Justice as a principle of formation of the legal system // Theoretical problems of the formation of the legal system of Russia. Novosibirsk, 1999. P. 35 - 50 (in Russ.).
33. Chechelnitsky I.V. Justice and law-making. M., 2017 (in Russ.).
34. Shelygin K.V. Applicant for the position of judge in the mirror of psychology // Qualification collegiums of judges: yesterday, today, tomorrow: collection of articles. M., 2012. P. 157 (in Russ.).
35. Yartsev A.A. Discussion around the creation of administrative courts in modern Russia (on the pages of leading legal journals) // Arbitration and civil process. 2012. No. 10 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up