All
 
|
 
 


The phenomenology of the judicial (legal) decisions
 
PIIS013207690009668-6-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690009668-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Viktor N. Kornev 
Occupation: Head of Vitruk Department of Constitutional Law of the Russian state University of justice
Affiliation: Russian state University of Justice
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 5
Pages45-54
Abstract

The article deals with the philosophical and legal aspects of the nature of a judicial (legal) decision from the standpoint of phenomenology and philosophy of language. The reasoning is based primarily on the idea of the philosopher Hannah Arend, that mental activity in the world of phenomena is such phenomena of human consciousness as thinking, volition, and judgment. These are three basic types of mental activity. The same human mind thinks, wills and judges, which is directly related to the subject of our study, since the judicial (legal) decision is directly based on such phenomena of the judge's consciousness. Using the works of Kant, Husserl, Hegel, Arendt, Heidegger, Wittgenstein, and Riker, an attempt was made to make a philosophical and legal interpretation of the phenomenon of a (judicial) legal decision.

Keywordsjudicial decision, legal decision, phenomenology, intention, judgment, law, court, rule of law, principle of law, Philosophy of Law, philosophy of language. thinking, willing
Received03.02.2020
Publication date22.06.2020
Number of characters38493
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 839

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Alchurron K.E., Bulygin E.V. Expressive concept of norms // "Normative systems" and other works on the philosophy of law and the logic of norms / K.E. Alchurron, E.V. Bulygin, P. Gerdenfors, D. Makinson; ed. by E.N. Lisanyuk. SPb., 2013. P. 235 (in Russ.).
2. Anisimov S.F. Introduction to axiology. M., 2001 (in Russ.).
3. Arendt H. Life of the mind / transl. from Engl. A.V. Govorunov. M., 2013. P. 64, 72, 114, 513 (in Russ.).
4. Arendt H. Lectures on Kant's political philosophy. SPb., 2011, P. 13 (in Russ.).
5. Bulygin E.V. What is legal positivism? // Jurisprudence. 2011. No. 4. P. 242 (in Russ.).
6. Bunina A.V. The verdict of the court as an act of justice. Its property. Orenburg, 2006 (in Russ.).
7. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical research // Languages as an image of the world. M., SPb., 2003. P. 236 (in Russ.).
8. Gadzhiev G.A. Ontology of law: (a critical study of the legal concept of reality). M., 2013. P. 262, 263 (in Russ.).
9. Hegel G.V F. Science of logic. M., 2005, P. 92 (in Russ.).
10. Groshevoy Yu. M. The essence of judicial decisions in the Soviet criminal process. Kharkiv, 1979 (in Russ.).
11. Husserl E. Ideas for pure phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy. First book / trans. from German A.V. Mikhailov; intro. art. V.A. Kurennoy. M., 2009. P. 262, 273 (in Russ.).
12. Demchenko G.V. Quality of legal norms and nature of imperatives of law // State-legal views of Russian emigration (1920s –1940s): historical and legal essays / ed. by S.I. Mikhalchenko. Bryansk, 2010 (in Russ.).
13. Zagorsky G.I. Resolution of the sentence. Problems of theory and practice. M., 2017 (in Russ.).
14. Ivin A.A. Aksiologiya. M., 2006. P. 19, 21 (in Russ.).
15. Ivin A.A. Bases of logic of estimates. M., 1970. P. 45 (in Russ.).
16. Ivlev Yu. V. Theory and practice of argumentation: Textbook. M., 2009. P. 45 (in Russ.).
17. Kant I. Critique of pure reason / trans. from German N.N. Lossky, verified and ed. by Ts. G. Arzakanyan and M.I. Itkin; note by Ts. G. Arzakanyan. M., 2010. P. 54, 154, 155, 286 (in Russ.).
18. Kant I. Spor of faculties / trans. from German Ts. G. Arzakanyan, I.D. Koptsev, M.I. Levina; ed. by L.A. Kalinnikov. Kaliningrad, 2002. P. 62 (in Russ.).
19. Kelzen G. Pure doctrine of law: collection of translations. Issue 1 / trans. from German S.V. Lezov, Yu. S. Pivovarov; ed. by V.N. Kudryavtsev, N.N. Razumovich. M., 1987. P. 16 (in Russ.).
20. Klenner G. From the law of nature to the nature of law / trans. from German; ed. by B.A. Kurakin; intro. art. L.S. Mamut. M., 1988. P. 238, 250 (in Russ.).
21. Kornev V. N. On the nature of the court decision // Russ. justice. 2014. No. 4. P. 16 - 24 (in Russ.).
22. Lupinskaya P.A. Decisions in criminal proceedings: theory, legislation and practice. 2nd ed., reprint. and add. M., 2010 (in Russ.).
23. Nenovsky N. Law and values / transl. from Bulg.; intro. art. and transl. V.M. Safonov; ed. by V.D. Zorkin. M., 1987 (in Russ.).
24. Riker P. Fair / trans. from French B. Skuratov, P. Hitsky: afterword by E. Schlosser. M., 2005. P. 148 (in Russ.).
25. Sorina G.V. Fundamentals of decision-making. M., 2006 (in Russ.).
26. Syrykh V.M. Logical foundations of the General theory of law: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. M., 2001. P. 316 (in Russ.).
27. Heidegger M. Being and time / trans. from German V.V. Bibikhin. M., 2011. P. 29 (in Russ.).
28. Cherdantsev A.F. Logico-linguistic phenomena in jurisprudence. M., 2012. P. 82 (in Russ.).
29. Hart H.L.A., 1983. Essayin Jurisprudence and Philosophie. Oxford, 1983. P. 18, 19.
30. Kelsen H. Allgemeine Theorieder Normen. Wien, 1979. S. 21, 143, 144.
31. Mahlmann M. Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie. 4. Auflage. Zurich, 2016. S. 311.
32. Riehm T. Abwagungsentscheidungen in der praktischen Rechtsanwendung. München, 2006. S. 16 - 19.
33. Ruthers B. Rechtstheorie. München, 1999. S. 75.
34. Schneider J. Theorie juristischen Entscheidens // Hassamer/Neumann/Saliger (Hrsg.). Einfurung in die Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart. 9. Auflage. C.F. Muller, 2016.
35. Wroblewsky J. Legal Decision and its Justification // Logiqueet Analys. Vol. 14. № 53-54 (1971). P. 410–419.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up