Religious Freedom and Criminal Law Practice in US Supreme Court Decisions

 
PIIS013207690009243-9-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690009243-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor at the Department of Criminal Law, Penza state University
Affiliation: Penza state University
Address: Russian Federation, Penza
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 4
Pages147-155
Abstract

The article examines the constitutional foundations and law enforcement practice of the Supreme Court in the interaction of religion and the criminal law system in the United States, analyzes the main directions of development of judicial practice in this area, as well as the most significant judicial doctrines and precedents of the United States Supreme Court on religious issues in criminal law. The article explores the features of the practice of applying by the Supreme Court of the United States such constitutional clauses as the “ban on the establishment of religion”, the provision of “freedom of religion” and “equal protection based on law”.

Keywordsreligion, US Supreme Court, Criminal Law, constitutional principle of equality
AcknowledgmentThis article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No. 19-011-00559-A, "State, Law and Religion in the USA: Legislation and Law Enforcement Practice"
Received29.10.2019
Publication date11.06.2020
Number of characters32011
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 859

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avakyan S.A. Freedom of religion as a constitutional and legal institution // Herald of Mosk. University. 1999. No. 1. P. 22 (in Russ.).

2. Bakhmetev P.V. Assessment of the norms on responsibility for crimes against freedom of conscience and religion in the context of their comparative analysis // Society and law. 2016. No. 3 (57). P. 94 (in Russ.).

3. Bakhmetev P.V. Criminal law guarantees of freedom of conscience and religion: domestic experience and international standards: abstract ... PhD in Law. Krasnodar, 2017. P. 3 (in Russ.).

4. Ermakova T.N., Petukhov K. V. Criminal-legal protection of freedom of conscience and belief in Russia and abroad // Herald of Vyatka state humanitarian University. 2015. No. 3. P. 71 (in Russ.).

5. Malakhov V.S., Lanchakov D.E. The Russian state in the sphere of religious, or national characteristics of secularism // World of Russia. Vol. 28. 2019. No. 4. P. 50–52 (in Russ.).

6. Martyshin O.V. Two laws on religious associations // State and Law. 2015. No. 2. P. 60 (in Russ.).

7. America’s Changing Religious Landscape, May 12, 2015. URL: http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape (accessed: 25.07.2016).

8. Bussey B.W. The Legal Revolution Against the Place of Religion: The Case of Trinity Western University Law School. Brigham Young University Law Review. 2016. P. 1137 - 1139.

9. Chambers, M.M. The colleges and the courts. Faculty and staff before the bench. Danville (Ill.): “The interstate”, 1973. P. 115, 116.

10. Cohen, C.L., Numbers, R.L. (ed.) (2013) Gods in America: religious pluralism in the United States. Oxford. P. 50, 51.

11. Connor, Ph. Nearly half of refugees entering the U.S. this year are Muslim, August 16, 2016. URL: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/08/16/nearly-half-of-refugees-entering-the-u-s-this-year-are-muslim

12. Faith on the Hill. The religious composition of the 116th Congress. January 3, 2019. URL: https://www.pewforum.org/2019/01/03/faith-on-the-hill-116/

13. Fisher L. (2016) Congress: protecting individual rights. Lawrence, Kansas, 2016. P. 146, 147.

14. Fowler, R.B. (2014) Religion and politics in America: faith, culture, and strategic choices. Boulder, Colorado. P. 83.

15. Hall, K.L. (ed.) Conscience and belief: The Supreme Court and Religion. New York, 2000. P. 191 - 268.

16. Institutional aid. Federal support to colleges and universities. A rep. and recommendations by the Carnegie commission on higher education. N.Y., 1972. P. 271 - 288.

17. Kaplin, W.A., Lee, B.A. The Law of Higher Education. San Francisco, 2007. P. 676.

18. McWhirter, D.A. The Separation of Church and State. Phoenix, 1994. P. 109, 113, 114, 140.

19. Ravishankar K. The Establishment Clause Hydra: The Lemon Test in the Circuit Courts // University of Dayton Law Review. 2016. Vol. 41. № 2. P. 301.

20. Saamer A. Is History Repeating Itself? Sentencing Young American Muslims in the War on Terror // Yale Law Journal. Vol. 126. 2017. P. 1520 - 1576.

21. Sahar F. Aziz A Muslim Registry: The Precursor to Internment? // BYU Law Review. 2017. № 4. P. 782.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up