All
 
|
 
 


On the impact of foreign socio-entrepreneurial experience on the transformation of the legal model of corporate governance in the digital age
 
PIIS013207690007192-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690007192-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Alexey Barkov 
Affiliation:
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (RANEPA)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 10
Pages112-120
Abstract

Attention is drawn to the demand in the foreign theory and practice of socio-entrepreneurial experience of legalization mission-oriented corporations, effectively providing in the digital age, the interests of not only its shareholders, but also a wide range of stakeholders, contributing to the increase of not only shareholder value, but also competitive advantages in solving social, environmental, scientific and other socially significant problems. The thesis that the use of the term "corporate governance 2.0" in the semantic connection with the concepts of "corporate social responsibility 2.0", "Internet 2.0", "digital technologies", "mission-oriented Corporation", "social entrepreneurship" should be considered as evidence of rethinking scientific approaches in the era of digital transformation. In order to optimize the transition in Russia to the models of corporate governance version 2.0 and 3.0, based on foreign experience, the proposed legal instrument is legalization, the mission of the oriented Corporation on the model of the North American social company "Benefit corporation". 

Keywordswelfare state, social entrepreneurship, legislation on social and solidary economy
AcknowledgmentThe article is based on the results of research carried out within the framework of the state task of the RANEPA under the President of the Russian Federation on the research work "Legalization of social entrepreneurship in Russia and abroad: trends and prospects of development"
Received15.10.2019
Publication date02.12.2019
Number of characters27438
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 942

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. 50 companies in the field of artificial intelligence, which should be monitored [Electronic resource] - Access mode: URL: https://vc.ru/future/24386-50-ai-companies  (accessed: 28.02.2019) (in Russ.).
2. Kanaeva O.A. Social policy of Russian companies 2.0: a new version for sustainable development // Problems of modern economy. 2014. No. 2(50). P. 132–137 (in Russ.).
3. Milovidov V.D. Corporate governance 2.0: evolution of the system of corporate relations in the information society.problems of national strategy. 2017. No. 4 (43). P. 171–198 (in Russ.).
4. Talapina E.V. Law and digitization: new challenges and prospects // Journal of the Russian law. 2018. No. 2. P. 5–17 (in Russ.).
5. Tambovtsev V.L. Strategic theory of the firm: state and possible development // Russian journal of management. Vol. 8. 2010. No. 1. P. 5 - 40 (in Russ.).
6. Abgasskandal [Electronic resource] – Access mode: URL: //https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abgasskandal  (accessed: 22.02.2019).
7. Blair M.M. and Stout Lynn A. A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review. Vol. 85. 1999. No. 2. P. 248 - 328. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=425500  or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.425500  (accessed: 28.02.2019).
8. Cooney K. Mission control: Examining the institutionalization of new legal forms of social enterprise in different strategic action fields // In: Gidron B. and Hasenfeld Y. (eds.) Social Enterprise: An Organizational Perspective. Hampshire, England, 2012 (äàòà îáðàùåíèÿ: 23.02.2019).
9. Dees J.G. The meaning of social entrepreneurship // Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship / Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business. 2001 (revised vers.) [Electronic resource] – Access mode: URL: http://www.caseatduke.org  / documents / dees_sedef.pdf, p. 14 (accessed: 28.02.2019).
10. Levillain K. Les entreprises a mission: Formes, modele et implications d’un engagement collectif. These de doctorat en Sciences de gestion. Paris, 2017. P. 307 [Electronic resource] – Access mode: URL: http://www.theses.fr/2015ENMP0010  (accessed: 23.02.2019).
11. Rasche A. Collaborative Governance 2.0 // Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society. Vol. 10(4). 2010. Sept. P. 500–511.
12. Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance and Gee and Co Ltd. London, 1992. Dec.
13. Subramanian G. Corporate Governance 2.0 // Harvard Business Review. Vol. 93. 2015. ¹ 3. P. 96–105.
14. Visser W. CSR 2.0 as a New Metaphor (ÊÑÎ 2.0, êàê íîâàÿ ìåòàôîðà [Electronic resource] – Access mode: URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-40874-8_4  (accessed: 15.03.2019).
15. Visser W. CSR 2.0: Reinventing Corporate Social Responsibility for the 21st Century (CSR 2.0: ïåðåîñìûñëåíèå êîðïîðàòèâíîé ñîöèàëüíîé îòâåòñòâåííîñòè â 21 âåêå) [Electronic resource] – Access mode: URL: https://www.managementexchange.com/hack/csr-20-reinventing-corporate-social-responsibility-21st-century  (accessed: 15.03.2019).
16. Visser W. The Age of Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business (Ýïîõà îòâåòñòâåííîñòè: ÊÑÎ 2.0 è íîâàÿ ÄÍÊ áèçíåñà). London, 2011.
17. Visser W. CSR 2.0: The new era of corporate sustainability and responsibility // CSR International Inspiration Series. 2008. ¹ 1. P. 1, 2.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up