Optimization of tax payment as a legitimate interest of the taxpayer

 
PIIS013207690005885-5-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690005885-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: North-West Institute (branch) of Kutafin University (MSLA)
Address: Russian Federation, Vologda
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 7
Pages123-131
Abstract

The article deals with the optimization of tax payments through the category of the taxpayer's legal interest, that is, the aspiration permitted by the law in the acquisition (preservation) of tax benefits. The author notes the natural and legal nature of this desire of the taxpayer and distinguishes the phenomenon of optimization from tax evasion as illegal and reprehensible. Opinions of various scientists are investigated, judicial practice is analyzed, examples of tax optimization are given. It is concluded that the purpose of the optimal tax payment is the correct calculation of the tax, that is, the determination of actual amount of the tax liability and the exclusion of overpaid tax.

Keywordstaxpayer, tax authority, legal interest, tax obligation, tax optimization (minimization), actual size of tax liability, tax regime, tax evasion, good faith, justice, fairness
Received15.07.2019
Publication date27.08.2019
Number of characters30699
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1153

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bajrachnyj Yu. N. Razvitie mekhanizma nalogovogo planirovaniya s ispol'zovaniem off-shornyh instrumentov: dis. ... kand. ekon. nauk. M., 2001.

2. Belousov S.A. Zakonodatel'nyj disbalans (doktrina, teoriya, praktika): dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2015. P. 165.

3. Berendts E.N. Russkoe finansovoe pravo: lekcii, chitannye v Imperatorskom uchilishche pravovedeniya. SPb., 1914. P. 50, 51.

4. Britanskij parlament obvinil Amazon, Google i Starbucks v uhode ot uplaty nalogov [El-ektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://www.vedomosti.ru/finance/news/2012/11/13/britanskij_parlament_obvinil_amazon_google_i_starbucks_v (data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2018).

5. Bryzgalin A.V., Bernik V.R., Golovkin A.N. Nalogovaya optimizaciya: principy, metody, rekomendacii, arbitrazhnaya praktika. - M., 2007. P. 8.

6. Vinnickij D.V. Problemy razgranicheniya nalogovogo planirovaniya i dejstvij, napravlen-nyh na uklonenie ot nalogooblozheniya // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2006. ¹ 11. P. 63, 64.

7. Vycherova N.V. Ispolnenie obyazannosti po uplate imushchestvennyh nalogov v Rossijskoj Federacii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2016. P. 74.

8. Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava // Gegel' G. Poln. sobr. soch.: v 14 t. T. VII. M.; L., 1934. P. 144.

9. Godme P.-M. Finansovoe pravo. M., 1978. P. 371, 373.

10. Demin A.V. Neopredelennost' v nalogovom prave i pravovye sredstva ee preodoleniya: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2014. P. 233.

11. Doroshkova A.G. Sluchai pred"yavleniya nalogovymi organami yavno neobosnovannyh pretenzij k nalogoplatel'shchikam mnogochislenny / interv'yuer M. Zavyazochnikova // Nalogoved. 2010. ¹ 12. P. 23 - 32 [Elektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://nalogoved.ru/art/1134 (data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2018).

12. Elinskij A.A. Opyt Velikobritanii i SShA po razgranicheniyu zakonnoj i nezakonnoj min-imizacii nalogov i ego znachenie dlya sovershenstvovaniya rossijskogo zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2006. ¹ 10. P. 140.

13. Efremova O.N. Put' ot nalogovoj optimizacii do nalogovogo prestupleniya (Okonchanie) [Elektronnyj resurs] // Goryachaya liniya buhgaltera. 2008. ¹ 20. Dostup iz SPS “Konsul'tantPlyus” (data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2018).

14. Zadorogin S.I. Pravovoe obespechenie optimizacii nalogooblozheniya v Rossijskoj Fed-eracii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004.

15. Zankin D.B. Razgranichenie nalogovoj optimizacii i nalogovyh pravonarushenij // Vash nalogovyj advokat. 2004. ¹ 2. P. 66.

16. Kvalifikacionnyj spravochnik dolzhnostej rukovoditelej, specialistov i drugih sluzhashchih (utv. postanovleniem Mintruda Rossii ot 21.08.1998 g. ¹ 37) (v red. ot 12.02.2014 g.) // Biblioteka i zakon. Vyp. 23. 2007. ¹ 2; vyp. 25. 2008. ¹ 2.

17. Mihajlova O. Minimizaciya dolzhna byt' zakonnoj [Elektronnyj resurs] // EZh-Yurist. 2004. ¹ 16. Dostup iz SPS “Konsul'tantPlyus” (data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2018).

18. Myshkin B.V. Nalogovaya optimizaciya kak proyavlenie nalogovoj pravosub"ektnosti: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004.

19. Nazarov R.V. Processual'nye osobennosti ispolneniya nalogovoj obyazannosti [Elektronnyj resurs] // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2014. ¹ 3. S. 32 - 37. Dostup iz SPS “Konsul'tantPlyus” (data obrashcheniya: 01.04.2018).

20. Filippova K.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za nalogovye prestupleniya: mezhotraslevye svyazi: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2017. P. 15.

21. Shchekin D.M. Prezumpciya dobrosovestnosti nalogoplatel'shchika // Vash nalogovyj advokat. 2001. ¹ 1. P. 41.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up