Situational norms in Civil Law

 
PIIS013207690004860-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690004860-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
Address: Russian Federation
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 5
Pages54-67
Abstract

Dispositive norms in modern civil law are a logical continuation of the constitutional principles of a market economy, its "backbone." Imperative norms of civil law, in turn, in the conditions of economic instability, the lack of developed economic institutions are called upon to establish a reasonable framework of behavior for the participants of civil turnover, to protect the obviously weak side from imposing unprofitable contractual terms on it in the situation of impossibility to choose a counterparty, to give stability to civil turnover. At the same time, the legislator, when establishing in any issue a dispositive or imperative order, may not take into account his injustice for some particular situations. Undoubtedly, the difficulty of achieving fairness of the legal norm in relation to all circumstances is one of the most important issues of legal science and practice. On the basis of the conducted review of judicial practice, the author shows the variability of the nature (mandatory prescriptions) of certain legal norms, depending on the factual circumstances accompanying their application against the background of the inappropriateness of referring them to imperative or dispositive norms. In this regard, a proposal has been made on the need to identify situational norms - legal norms, the mandatory nature of their prescriptions is variable, and dependent on the accompanying factual circumstances. From the standpoint of logic, situational norms are a concept that intersects with the concepts of "dispositive norms" and "imperative norms", but not the latter. In the context of the foreign experience shown, situational norms are regarded by the author as a result of judicial lawmaking.

Keywordsdispositive norms, mandatory norms, judicial lawmaking, situational norms, public interest
Received22.04.2019
Publication date21.05.2019
Number of characters52603
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1416

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avak'yan S.A. Konstituciya Rossii: priroda, evolyuciya, sovremennost'. M., 1997. S.°206–209.

2. Aleksi R. Ponyatie i dejstvitel'nost' prava (otvet yuridicheskomu pozitivizmu) (Alexy R. Begriff und Geltung des Rechts) / per. s nem. A. Laptev, F. Kal'shojer; pred., sost. V. Bergmann; nauch. red. T. Yakovleva. M., 2011. S. 8, 9, 88.

3. Anishina V.I. Pravovaya priroda aktov sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2006. ¹ 10. S. 128.

4. Boshno S.V. Norma prava: ponyatiya, svojstva, klassifikaciya i struktura // Pravo i sov-remennye gosudarstva. 2014. ¹ 4. S. 55.

5. Bruno Leoni. Svoboda i zakon / per. s angl. V. Koshkina; pod red. A. Kuryaeva. M., 2008. S. 206.

6. Vitryanskij V.V. Reforma rossijskogo grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva: promezhu-tochnye itogi. M., 2016. S. 280.

7. Volos A.A. Principy obyazatel'stvennogo prava / pod red. E.V. Vavilina. M., 2016. S.°68.

8. Vseobshchij grazhdanskij kodeks Avstrii ot 01.06.1811 g. (Allgemeines burgerliches Gesetzbuch) / per. s nem. S.S. Maslov. M., 2011. S. 3.

9. Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie Germanii ot 18.08.1896 g.: Vvodnyj zakon k Grazhdanskomu ulozheniyu (Burgerliches Gesetzbuch Deutschlands mit Einfuhrungsgesetz) / per. s nem.; vved., sost. V. Bergmann; nauch. red. T.F. Yakovleva. 4-e izd., pererab. M., 2015. (Ser. “Germanskie i evropejskie zakony”). S. 39, 59.

10. Evstigneev E.A. Imperativnye i dispozitivnye normy v dogovornom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2016.

11. Evstigneev E.A. Imperativnye i dispozitivnye normy v dogovornom prave: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2015. S. 26, 27, 81.

12. Egorov A. O prezumpcii imperativnosti ili dispozitivnosti norm dogovornogo prava [Elektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: URL: http://www.rapsinews.ru/judicial_analyst/20120521/263223383.html#ixzz4egJEHu5V (data obrashcheniya: 25.04.2017).

13. Egorov A.M. Sudebnye akty v pravovoj sisteme Rossijskoj Federacii: teoretiko-pravovoj analiz: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2011. S. 6.

14. Zhgulev A.A. Dobrosovestnost' pri ispolnenii obyazatel'stva. M., 2011. S. 37.

15. Zamechaniya o nedostatkah dejstvuyushchih grazhdanskih zakonov. SPb., 1891. S. 3 - 5.

16. Zahvataev V.N. Kodeks Napoleona. M., 2012. S. 239, 240.

17. Karapetov A.G., Fetisova E.M. Praktika primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami po-stanovleniya Plenuma VAS RF ot 14.03.2014 g. ¹ 16 «O svobode dogovora» // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya. 2015. ¹ 12. S.°145 - 191.

18. Kornev A.V. Tolkovanie prava v kontekste razlichnyh tipov pravoponimaniya // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2016. ¹ 8 (236). S. 33, 34.

19. Kot A.A. Svoboda dogovora v grazhdanskom prave Ukrainy // Svoboda dogovora: sb. st. / ruk. avt. kol. i otv. red. M.A. Rozhkova. M., 2016. S. 64, 65.

20. Lipen' S.V. Idei pravotvorchestva i pravorealizacii v politiko-pravovoj mysli Rossii XIX – nachala XX v.: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2013. S. 18.

21. Lopatin V.N. Konstitucionnaya zakonnost' i problemy normotvorchestva v Rossii // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2005. ¹ 5. S. 3 - 13.

22. Montesk'yo Sh. L. O duhe zakonov [Elektronnyj resurs] – Rezhim dostupa: URL: https://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Monteskye_O%20dukhe.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 20.04.2017).

23. Omel'chenko O.A. Rimskoe pravo: ucheb. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M., 2011. S. 17.

24. Petrunin A.M. Uchenie o seredine – osnova nauchnoj filosofii // Novye idei v filosofii. 2007. ¹°16. S. 307.

25. Pokrovskij I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. Pg., 1917. S. 8–10, 80–82, 309.

26. Pokrovskij I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. 7-e izd., stereot. M., 2016. S. 14.

27. Sadikov O.N. Imperativnye i dispozitivnye normy v grazhdanskom prave // Yuridicheskij mir. 2001. ¹ 7. S. 4 - 9.

28. Sootnoshenie imperativnyh i dispozitivnyh nachal v korporativnom prave: sb. st. / pod red. I.S. Shitkinoj. M., 2017. S. 4.

29. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: ucheb. posobie / V.I. Vlasov, G.B. Vlasova, S.V. Deni-senko. 4-e izd. Rostov n/D., 2015. S. 201.

30. Cherednichenko S.P. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo: sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledova-nie: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2005. S. 24.

31. Erlih O. Osnovopolozhenie sociologii prava / per. s nem. M.V. Antonova; pod red. V.G. Grafskogo, Yu.I.°Grevcova. SPb., 2011. S. 406, 543, 544.

32. Errera K.M. Sravnitel'noe pravo i social'nye nauki. Nekotorye zamechaniya ob Ed-uarde Lambere // Vestnik Universiteta im. O.E. Kutafina. 2015. ¹ 5. S. 13 - 20.

33. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika: ucheb. posobie po podgotovke zakonoproektov i inyh nor-mativnyh pravovyh aktov organami ispolnitel'noj vlasti / pod. red. T.Ya. Hab-rievoj, N.A.°Vlasenko. M., 2010. S. 61, 62.

34. Yacenko T.S. Grazhdansko-pravovaya zashchita publichnyh interesov / pod nauch. red. V.S. Ema. M., 2016. S. 174.

35. Hayek F.A. The Political Ideal of the Rule of Law (Cairo: Fiftieth Anniversary Com-mem-oration Lectures, National Bank of Egypt, 1955). P. 36.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up