Agnosticism can not be in the base of fair trial

 
PIIS013207690002188-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690002188-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: The Faculty of Law of the Southern Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 11
Pages126-129
Abstract

The article is devoted to the theoretical and cognitive bases of the criminal process. The truth of knowledge about the circumstances of committed or alleged offense is an indispensable condition for the performance of the appointment of a criminal trial, its fairness. 

Keywordscognition of objective reality, rational and reasonable in cognition, legal guarantees of establishing the truth in the case
Publication date11.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1282

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Pobedkin A.V. Teoriya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo dokazyvaniya: ne dopustit' revizii // Sovremennye problemy dokazyvaniya i prinyatiya reshenij v ugolovnom protsesse. Sotsial'nye tekhnologii i pravovye instituty. M., 2016. S. 360–365.

2. Lazareva V.A. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom protsesse. M., 2012. S. 27, 40.

3. Tulenkov D.P. Poznavatel'naya deyatel'nost' pri proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedatelej: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2017. S. 7.

4. Sokol V.Yu. Krizis otechestvennoj kriminalistiki. Krasnodar, 2017. S. 77, 161, 162 i dr.

5. Pashin S.A. Problemy dokazatel'stvennogo prava // Sudebnaya reforma: yuridicheskij professionalizm i problemy yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya. Diskussii. M., 1995. S. 312.

6. Voskobitova L.A. Filosofskie aspekty problem poznaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Filosofskie nauki. 2013. № 12. S. 21–30.

7. Chel'tsov-Bebutov M.A. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava. T. 1. M., 1957. S. 85.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up