Techno-Humanity and the Anthropology of the Everyday

 
PIIS086954150002452-7-1
DOI10.31857/S086954150002452-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Chief Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 32a Leninsky prospekt, Moscow, 119991, Russia
Journal nameEtnograficheskoe obozrenie
Edition6
Pages54-65
Abstract

Current anthropology of the everyday lacks attention to technical artifacts and constant involvement of our bodies into, or their interactions with, technosphere. The on-going intensification of this involvement with digital and assistive technologies brings with it the imminent transformation of techno-humanity into cyberhumanity. The article describes the main mechanisms (such as extension and incorporation) that fuse the human body and its technical milieu into autonomous assemblages and hybrid entities. Finally, the author discusses the merits and limitations of autoethnography as a research method for the study of phenomenological or lived body.

Keywordscyberhumanity, technosphere, lived body, extension, incorporation, autoethnography
AcknowledgmentThis research was supported by the following institutions and grants: Russian Science Foundation, https://doi.org/10.13039/501100006769 [grant no. 18-18-00082]
Received28.12.2018
Publication date28.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 238

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Manjoo F. We Have Reached Peak Screen. Now Revolution Is in the Air // The New York Times. June 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/27

2. Agamben, G. (2002) 2012. Otkrytoe: chelovek i zhivotnoe [The Open: Man and Animal]. Moscow: RGGU.

3. Arzakanian, Ts.G., and V. G. Gorokhov, eds. 1989. Filosofiia tekhniki v FRG [The Philosophy of Technics]. Moscow: Progress.

4. Bateson, G. (1972) 1987. Steps to Ecology of Mind. London: Jason Aronson Inc.

5. Canguilhem G. Knowledge of Life. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.

6. Ellul, J. 1964. The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books.

7. Gille, B. ed. (1978) 1986. The History of Techniques. Vol. 1. Techniques and Civilizations; Vol. 2. Techniques and Sciences. New York: Gordon & Breach Science Publishers.

8. Habermas, J. 2003. Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie” [Technics and Science as “Ideology”]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

9. Haraway, D. (1985) 2005. Manifest kiborgov: nauka, tekhnologiia i sotsialisticheskii feminizm 1980-kh gg. [Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century]. In Gendernaia teoriia i iskusstvo. Antologiia: 1970–2000 [Gender Theory and Art: An Anthology], edited by L. M. Bredikhina, 322–377. Moscow: ROSSPEN.

10. Heidegger, M. (1949) 1993. Vopros o tekhnike [The Issue of Technics]. In Vremia i bytie. Stat’i i vystupleniia [Time and Being. Articles and Speeches], edited by. V. V. Bibikhina, 211–238. Moscow: Respublika.

11. Ihde, D. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

12. Ihde, D. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technoscience. Albany: SUNY Press.

13. Ingold, T. 1994. Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology. London: Routledge.

14. Lafitte, J. (1932) 1972. Réflexions sur la science des machines [Reflections on the Science of Machines]. Paris: Vrin.

15. Lebedeva, N.D. 2016. Ot fenomenologii tela k izucheniiu form vzaimodeistviia: sotsiologicheskoe prochtenie Germana Shmittsa [From the Body Phenomenology to the Study of Interaction Forms: Sociological Reading of Hermann Schmitz]. Sotsiologiia vlasti 28 (1): 14–34.

16. Lemonnier, P. 1992. Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Ann Arbor: Anthropology Museum.

17. Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1943, 1945. Evolution et techniques. Vol. 1. L’Homme et la matière; Vol. 2. Milieu et techniques [Evolutions and Technics. Vol. 1. Man and Matter; Vol. 2. Environment and Technics]. Paris: Editions Albin Michel.

18. Mauss, M. 1936. Les techniques du corps [Body Techniques]. Journal de Psychologie XXXII (3–4): 271–293.

19. Merleau-Ponty, M. 2006. Vidimoe i nevidimoe [Visible and Invisible]. Minsk: Logvinov.

20. Mumford, L. 1934. Technics and Civilization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

21. Plessner, H. (1928) 1975. Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch: Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie [The Levels of the Organic and Man: An Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

22. Rykin, P.O. 2007. Ot modelei k strategiiam: P’er Burd’e i ego vklad v etnologicheskuiu teoriiu [From Models to Strategies: Pierre Bourdieu and His Contribution to Ethnological Theory]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 4: 3–15.

23. Schmitz, H. 2011. Der Leib [The Body]. Berlin: De Gruyter.

24. Simondon, G. (1958) 2001. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques [On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects]. Paris: Aubier.

25. Stiegler, B. 1994, 1996, 2001. La Technique et le Temps [Technics and Time], 1–3. Paris: Editions Galilée.

26. Stiegler, B. 2015. La société automatique. Vol. 1. L’avenir du travail [Automatic Society. Vol. 1. The Future of Work]. Paris: Fayard.

27. Tishchenko, P.D. 2013. Biovlast’: evristicheskoe prostranstvo kontsepta v antropologii [Biopower: The Concept’s Space in Anthropology]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 6: 102–108.

28. Uexküll, J. von. 1921. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere [Environment and the Inner World of Animals]. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

29. Viner, N. 2007. Chelovek i mashina [Human and Machine]. In Chelovek v tret’em tysiacheletii. Rabochie tetradi gumanitarnogo seminara [Human in the Third Millennium. Working Papers of a Humanities Seminar], edited by A. V. Diakova, 215–221. Kursk: Izdatel’stvo Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up