Philosophical and Non-Philosophical Anthropology: Epistemological Privileges and Appropriations (An Introduction)

 
PIIS086954150001473-0-1
DOI10.31857/S086954150001473-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Ural Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Ekaterinburg, 51 Lenina prospekt
Journal nameEtnograficheskoe obozrenie
Edition5
Pages5-12
Abstract

The article introduces a special theme of the issue on the interconnections between social and philosophical anthropology, as well as social anthropology and philosophy more generally. The author examines how references to philosophical anthropology are used for marketing educational programs and textbooks, and promoting scholars. A broad range of related issues is discussed in contributions by T. Shchyttsova, E. Miskova, A. Menshikov, and E. Trubina.

Keywordssocial anthropology, philosophical anthropology, interdisciplinary dialogue, disciplinary knowledge
Received26.12.2018
Publication date26.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 1363

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Demin, M. 2015 Dilemma professii: sovetskie instituty i sovremennaia universitetskaia filosofiia v Rossii [The Dilemma of the Profession: The Soviet Institutions and the Contemporary Philosophy in the Russian Universities]. In Nauki o cheloveke: istoriia distsiplin [The Sciences about the Human: The History of the Disciplines], edited by A. N. Dmitriev and I. M. Savelyeva, 483–508. Moscow: Izdatelskii dom Vyschei schkoly ekonomiki.

2. Dmitriev, A. 2015. Distsiplinarnye poriadki v gumanitarnykh i sotsial’nykh naukakh [The Disciplinary Orders in Humanities and Social Sciences]. In Nauki o cheloveke: istoriia distsiplin [The Sciencesabout the Human: The History of the Disciplines], edited by A. N. Dmitriev and I. M. Savelyeva, 7–39. Moscow: Izdatelskii dom Vyschei schkoly ekonomiki.

3. Gurevich, P., ed. 1988. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoi filosofii: perevody [The Problem of the Human in the Western Philosophy]. Мoscow: Progress.

4. Gurevich, P. 2015. Slovo glavnogo redaktora [The Editor’s Foreword]. Filosofskaia antropologiia 1 (1): 4–5.

5. Heatherington, T., and F. Zerill, ed. 2016. Anthropologists in/of the Neoliberal Academy. Anuac – Journal of National Association Anthropology 5 (1): 41–90.

6. Margolis, J. 2007. Present Doldrums, Pleasant Prospects: Philosophy Early in the New Century. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1): 15–34.

7. Markov, B. 2016. Politicheskaia antropologiia. Uchebnik dlia vuzov [Political Anthropology: A Textbook]. St. Petersburg: Piter.

8. Pershái, A. 2010. Minor Nation. The Alternative Modes of Belarusian Nationalism. East European Politics and Societies 24 (3): 379–398.

9. Sheler, M. 1988. Polozhenie cheloveka v Kosmose [The Human’s Place in the Cosmos]. In Problema cheloveka v zapadnoi filosofii: perevody [The Problem of the Human in the Western Philosophy], edited by P. S. Gurevich, 31–95. Moscow: Progress.

10. Vigh, H.E., and D. B. Sausdal. 2014. From Essence Back to Existence: Anthropology Beyond the Ontological Turn. Anthropological Theory 14 (1): 49–73.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up