All
 
|
 
 


Integrity as a category of public law and its consideration in the implementation of state control and supervision
 
PIIS102694520010713-5-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520010713-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Saniyat Agamagomedova 
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of state and legal disciplines of Penza state University
Affiliation: Penza State University
Address: Russian Federation, Penza, St. Kulakova, 2- 251
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 7
Pages124-131
Abstract

The article examines the features of using the category of integrity in the regulation and law enforcement practice of state control and supervision bodies. Based on the content analysis of administrative-procedural and program-strategic support for the reform of control and Supervisory activities, a conclusion is made about the specifics of applying the category of integrity in the public legal sphere. The author defines qualitatively new values of the category of conscientiousness when used in order to ensure control and Supervisory activities: conscientiousness as a criterion for differentiating controlled persons; as a tool for additional protection of a controlled person; as a vector of control and Supervisory activities. The author also studies the peculiarities of applying the category of good faith in public law, related to its broad content and differentiation depending on the subject of public legal relations.

Keywordsintegrity, state control and supervision, controlled persons, public law, reform of control and Supervisory activities, state, public authority, integrity, prevention, conscientious behavior
Received26.08.2019
Publication date07.08.2020
Number of characters31734
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 812

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Ageshkina N.A. Comment to the Federal law of July 24, 2007 No. 209-FZ "On the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the Russian Federation" (article by article) / ed. by T.A. Guseva // "ConsultantPlus". 2016 (in Russ.).
2. Arapov N.A. Binding consequences of the principle of maintaining citizens trust in the law and the actions of the state in the Russian Constitutional Law // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2014. No. 10. P. 3–6 (in Russ.).
3. Astakhova M.A. Principles of protection of the rights of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs in the implementation of state control (supervision) and municipal control // Lawyer. 2017. No. 15. P. 14–18 (in Russ.).
4. Bartsits I.N. Reform of public administration in Russia: a legal aspect. M., 2008. P. 37 (in Russ.).
5. Berger K.P., Arnts T. The principle of good faith in English commercial contract law. Review of current English judicial practice // Bulletin of Civil Law. 2016. No. 3. P. 234–269 (in Russ.).
6. Vaypan V.A., Egorova M.A. The significance of the principles of business law in the legal regulation of trade activities // Journal of business and corporate law. 2018. No. 1. P. 9 - 14 (in Russ.).
7. Vishnevsky A.A. The principle of good faith in foreign banking law: approaches to the problem // Law. 2017. No. 12. P. 177–186 (in Russ.).
8. Galendeev T. FCS: "We are already ahead of the customs authorities of the European Union". URL: http://www.np-srv.ru/news/tatyana-golendeeva-fts-my-uge-operedili-tamogennye-organy-evropeyskogo-soyuza.html  (accessed: 30.07.2019) (in Russ.).
9. Dal V.I. Explanatory dictionary of the living great Russian language: in 4 vols. Vol. I. M., 1998. P. 1104, 1105 (in Russ.).
10. Ivanov A.A. Problems of public law in Russia: a view from the side // Herald of economic justice of the Russian Federation. 2017. No. 2. P. 46 - 59 (in Russ.).
11. Nam K.V. History of the development of the principle of good faith (Treu und Glauben) in the period from 1900 to 1945 // Herald of economic justice of the Russian Federation. 2018. No. 6. P. 63–97 (in Russ.).
12. Nam K.V. Development of the principle of good faith (Treu und Glauben). Present stage. Internal taxonomy // Herald of economic justice of the Russian Federation. 2018. No. 7. P. 83 - 114 (in Russ.).
13. Ozhegov S.I., Shvedova N. Yu. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. 4th ed., add. M., 2010. P. 169 (in Russ.).
14. Support for small and medium-sized businesses in Saint Petersburg. URL: http://www.kvantex.ru/consult/flexa/nalprav.htm  (accessed: 30.07.2019) (in Russ.).
15. Using a single digit. Customs automates relations with participants of foreign economic activity. URL: https://rg.ru/2017/10/03/reg-ufo/krymskaia-tamozhnia-avtomatiziruet-vzaimootnosheniia-s-uchastnikami-ved.html  (accessed: 30.07.2019) (in Russ.).
16. Sklovsky K.I. Application of the law and the principle of good faith // Herald of economic justice of the Russian Federation. 2018. No. 2. P. 94 - 118 (in Russ.).
17. Stakhov A.I. On the ratio of non-judicial and judicial procedures for the application of administrative and legal coercion in the works of Professor Yuri Solovyov // Administrative Law and process. 2018. No. 7. P. 35-41 (in Russ.).
18. Suleimenov M.K. Application of the principle of good faith in the branches of private and public law // Law and state. 2015. No. 2 (67). P. 31–38 (in Russ.).
19. Theory of state and law: a course of lectures / ed. by N.I. Matuzov and A.V. Malko. 2nd ed., reprint. and add. M., 2004. P. 277, 280 (in Russ.).
20. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Administrative discretion and law // Journal of Russ. law. 2000. No. 4. P. 70–79 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up