The flagship of economic, mathematical and computer modeling: 60 years in line

 
PIIS042473880027042-5-1
DOI10.31857/S042473880027042-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Deputy Scientific Adviser
Affiliation:
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, RAS
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, State University of Management
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation
Journal nameEkonomika i matematicheskie metody
EditionVolume 59 No. 3
Pages5-20
Abstract

Main directions and evolution routes of the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute (CEMI) as a leader of domestic economic science in the development and application of economic-mathematical and information-computer models of socio-economic processes and systems were analyzed in the paper. The connection of modeling with such components of the economy as economic theory, economic policy, economic management and economic practice were clarified. It was shown that the economic and mathematical model plays an indispensable role in the integration and systematization of knowledge in the field of economic theory and economic practice. A generalized scheme and the sequence of modeling stages based on the concept of a model as a homomorphic image of a real object in the field of ontology (“the world of things”), ideology (“the world of ideas”), epistemology (“the world of knowledge”) and praxeology (“the world of creation”), were proposed. The evolution of the main components of modeling which had significantly changed over the past 60 years the ideas about the object, subject, goals, apparatus and empirical basis of modeling, were traced. The experience accumulated at CEMI RAS in this area allows us to propose the concept of evidence-based modeling, similar to the ideology of evidence-based medicine, evidence-based policy, evidence-based forecasting, aimed at qualitatively improving the validity and reliability of modeling results for applying in economic theory and practice. The main principles of evidence-based modeling that have to play the role of standards for evidence-based modeling were formulated. The modeling process was considered as an analogue of an innovative project, where every independent stage (likewise the entire project) should be carried out according to these standards. A list of the most important, in our opinion, pioneer works of CEMI RAS in the field of economic-mathematical and computer modeling, which determine significant directions for the further development of this field of science, were given.

 

Keywordseconomic and mathematical modeling, computer modeling, modeling stages, evidence-based modeling, homomorphism, Central Economics and Mathematics Institute (CEMI).
Received09.08.2023
Publication date19.09.2023
Number of characters47431
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 165

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Blanchard O.J. (2017). Macroeconomics. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson. 576 p.

2. Bolotin V.V. (1984). Random vibrations of elastic systems. Heidelberg: Springer. 468 p.

3. Brandt S. (2014). Data analysis: Statistical and computational methods for scientists and engineers. 4th ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 523 p.

4. Cho S. (2018). Fourier transform and its applications using Microsoft EXCEL®. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool. 123 p.

5. Cooley T.F., Prescott E.C. (1995). Economic growth and business cycles. In: Frontiers of business cycle research. T.F. Cooley (ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1–38.

6. Golosov M., Menzio G. (2020). Agency business cycles. Theoretical Economics, 15 (1), 123–158.

7. Karmalita V. (2020). Stochastic dynamics of economic cycles. Berlin: De Gruyter. 106 p.

8. Karmalita V.A. (2022). Predicting the trajectory of economic cycles. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 58 (2), 140–144.

9. Karmalita V.A. (2023). Recovering the actual trajectory of economic cycles. Economics and mathematical methods, 59 (2), 19–25.

10. Kehoe P.J., Midrigan V., Pastorino E. (2018). Evolution of modern business cycle models: Accounting for the great recession. Economic Perspectives, 32 (3), 141–166.

11. Korotaev A.V., Tsirel S.V. (2010). Spectral analysis of world GDP dynamics: Kondratieff waves, Kuznets swings, Juglar and Kitchin cycles in global economic development, and the 2008–2009 economic crisis. Structure and Dynamics, 4 (1), 3–57.

12. Kydland F., Prescott E. (1982). Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 50 (6), 1345–1370.

13. Pavleino M.A., Romadanov V.M. (2007). Spectral transforms in MATLAB®. St.-Petersburg: SPbSU. 160 p. (in Russian).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up