Computer testing of a non-parametric partial equilibrium model prototype

 
PIIS042473880025862-7-1
DOI10.31857/S042473880025862-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Leading Researcher
Affiliation:
Laboratory of financial and industrial integration mechanisms
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of Russian Academy of Science
Address: Moscow, Nakhimovsky prospekt, 47
Journal nameEkonomika i matematicheskie metody
EditionVolume 59 No. 2
Pages100-111
Abstract

On the basis of non-parametric formulations of the production program problem (previously known) and the consumer choice problem (new), a computable partial equilibrium model with a non-parametric representation of both supply and demand is proposed. In this model the problems of the producer and the consumer are represented by simultaneous inequalities of the dual problems pair. This converts the problem of finding an equilibrium to minimizing the differences between objective functions in each pair, summarized over producers and consumers. Such a problem, however, may have multiple local optima. Computer tests on artificial data sets confirmed that inserting such “technical” constraints into a computable model, that are always valid in an equilibrium, can effectively direct the search for a solution using the CONOPT4 procedure to the global optimum (to which the sought equilibrium corresponds). In all 36 tests carried out, equilibrium solutions were found on the first try. The result obtained is of significant importance for the creation of tools used at the sectoral level in managing the unstable economic dynamics that are characteristic of periods of change in systems of dominant technologies. Such tools will make better use of the information in the original empirical data.

Keywordspartial equilibrium, computable model, nonparametric production frontier, nonparametric consumption frontier, first duality theorem, computer-aided testing.
Received02.06.2023
Publication date30.06.2023
Number of characters29782
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 132

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Akaev A.A., Sadovnichiy V.A. (2016). A closed dynamic model to describe and calculate the Kondratiev long wave of economic development. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 86 (10), 883–896. DOI: 10.7868/S0869587316100029 (in Russian).

2. Britz W., Witzke P. (eds.) (2014). CAPRI model documentation 2014. Bonn: Institute for Food and Resource Economics, University of Bonn. 277 p.

3. Brown A., Deaton A. (1972). Surveys in applied economics: models of consumer behavior. The Economic Journal, 82, 328, 1145–1236.

4. Chantreuil F., Hanrahan K., Leeuwen M. van (2012). The future of EU agricultural markets by AGMEMOD. Dordrecht: Springer. XVI, 128 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2291-0

5. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

6. Dementiev V.E. (2021). The model of interference of long waves of economic development. Com-puter Research and Modeling, 13 (3), 649–663. DOI: 10.20537/2076-7633-2021-13-3-649-663 (in Russian).

7. Dementiev V.E., Evsukov S.G., Ustyuzhanina E.V. (2020). The importance of a strategic ap-proach to pricing in markets for network goods. Journal of the New Economic Association, 46 (2), 57–71. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2020-46-2-3 (in Russian).

8. Drud A. (1992). CONOPT — a large-scale GRG code. ORSA Journal on Computing, 6, 207–216.

9. Drud A. (2023). CONOPT4. GAMS – Documentation. GAMS Development Corp., 1547–1581.

10. Ermolieva T., Havlík P., Ermoliev Yu., Mosnier A., Obersteiner M., Leclère D., Khabarov N., Valin H., Reuter W. (2016). Integrated management of land use systems under systemic risks and security targets: A stochastic global biosphere management model. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67, 3, 584–601. DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12173

11. Farrell M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 3, 253–290.

12. Fock A., Weingarten P., Wahl O., Prokopiev M. (2000). Russia's bilateral agricultural trade: First results of a partial equilibrium analysis. Russia's Agro-food sector: Towards truly functioning markets / P. Wehrheim et al. (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishing, 271–197.

13. Goldberger A.S., Gamaletsos T. (1970). A cross-country comparison of consumer expenditure patterns. European Economic Review, 1, 357–400. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921 (70)90020-6

14. Gstach D. (1998). Another approach to data envelopment analysis in noisy environments: DEA+. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9, 2, 161–176. DOI: 10.1023/A:1018312801700

15. Houthakker H.S. (1965). New evidence on demand elasticities. Econometrica, 33, 277–288.

16. Huppmann D. (2013). Endogenous shifts in OPEC market power — a Stackelberg oligopoly with fringe. DIW Discussion Papers, 1313. Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research. 26 p.

17. Just R.E. (2011). Behavior, robustness, and sufficient statistics in welfare measurement. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 3, 33–70. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-040709-135125

18. Kiselev S., Strokov A., Belugin A. (2016). Projections of Russia’s agricultural development under the conditions of climate change. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 5, 548–556. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700716050063

19. Kiselev S.V., Romashkin R.A., Belugin A.Yu. (2022). Russia’s agri-food exports until 2030: Pro-jection from a partial equilibrium model. Journal of the New Economic Association, 56 (4), 69–90 (in Russian).

20. Lee J. D., Hwang S., Kim T. Y. (2005). The measurement of consumption efficiency considering the discrete choice of consumers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23, 65–83. DOI: 10.1007/s11123-004-8548-y

21. Matsumoto M., Nishimura T. (1998). Mersenne twister: A 623-dimensionnally equidistributed uniform pseudorandom number generator. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 8 (1), 3–30. DOI: 10.1145/272991.272995

22. Pollak R.A. (1977). Price dependent preferences. The American Economic Review, 67, 2, 64–75.

23. Polterovich V.M. (1990). Economic equilibrium and economic mechanism. Moscow: Nauka. 256 p. (in Russian).

24. Prokopiev M.G. (2015). Classification and methodical aspects of developing models of partial balance. Regional'nye Problemy Preobrazovaniya Ekonomiki, 6 (56), 88–95; 7 (57), 83–91 (in Russian).

25. Ruhnau O., Bucksteeg M., Ritter D., Schmitz R., Böttger D., Koch M., Pöstges A., Wied-mann M., Hirth L. (2022). Why electricity market models yield different results: Carbon pricing in a model-comparison experiment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153. Paper 111701. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111701

26. Savvidis G., Siala K., Weissbart C., Schmidt L., Borggrefe F., Kumar S., Pittel K., Madlener R., Hufendiek K. (2019). The gap between energy policy challenges and model capabilities. Energy Policy, 125, 503–520. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.033

27. Svetlov N.M. (2002). Towards a new conception of value. Moscow: MSKhA (in Russian).

28. Svetlov N.M. (2019). Non-parametric production frontier in a computable partial equilibrium model. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 55 (4), 104–116. DOI: 10.31857/S042473880006779-5 (in Russian).

29. Svetlov N.M. (2019a). Non-parametric production frontier models: Experience of agricultural ap-plications. Vestnik CEMI, 1, 5. DOI: 10.33276/S265838870004477-7 (in Russian).

30. Svetlov N.M., Buts' V.I., Karachevskaya E.V., Len'kova R.K., Red'ko D.V., Svetlova G.N., Shafranskaya I.V., Shafranskiy I.N. (2020). The use of mathematical methods in the man-agement of agro-industrial complex in Belarus and Russia. Moscow: CEMI RAS. DOI: 10.33276/978-5-8211-0782-4 (in Russian).

31. Svetlov N.M., Shishkina E.A. (2019). An innovative partial equilibrium model applied to the anal-ysis of effects of climate change. International Agricultural Journal, 5, 58–60. DOI: 10.24411/2587-6740-2019-11587 (in Russian).

32. Svetlov N.M., Siptits S.O., Romanenko I.A., Evdokimova N.E. (2019). The effect of climate change on the location of branches of agriculture in Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 30, 4, 406–418. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700719040154

33. Thompson R.G., Langemeier L.N., Lee C., Lee E., Thrall R.M. (1990). The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 93–108.

34. Zemtsov S.M., Filiptsov A.M. (2009). Calibration of cost and profit functions in partial equili-brium model BEL-ASIM: A theoretical aspect. Vestnik of Polotsk State University. Part D. Economic and Legal Sciences, 4, 52–58 (in Russian).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up