Towards the theory of general economic equilibrium

 
PIIS042473880020012-2-1
DOI10.31857/S042473880020012-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Principal Scientific Researcher
Affiliation: Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences (CEMI RAS)
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation
Journal nameEkonomika i matematicheskie metody
EditionVolume 58 Issue 3
Pages19-27
Abstract

The paper proposes a model of general economic equilibrium, when some firms can influence prices by their actions. Their primitives (that is, the description of production, distribution, and consumption) of the proposed model are the same as those of the Arrow–Debreu model. The difference lies in the behavior of oligopolistic firms: it is assumed that they (as in the original Cournot model) assign their production plans. The main innovation is the description of the decision-making process on production plans by oligopolistic firms. In previous models, it was assumed that oligopolistic firms seek to maximize profits at current prices. Here, a more natural assumption is made that oligopolistic firms make decisions about production plans through a vote of shareholders. It is shown how the Arrow–Debreu model can be modified to account for this circumstance. The concept of Condorcet–Cournot–Walras equilibrium is introduced, combining the ideas of these three classics. The question of the existence of equilibria is discussed. A simplified version of the model is also considered, in which each firm is owned by one agent. The simplification is that there is no need to turn to the voting.

KeywordsArrow-Debreu model, Cournot equilibrium, oligopoly, voting, Condorcet winner, profit maximization.
Received07.03.2022
Publication date22.09.2022
Number of characters32376
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 219

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Azar J. (2012). A new look at oligopoly: Implicit collusion through portfolio diversification. A dissertation presented to the faculty of Princeton University.

2. Azar J., Vives X. (2021). General equilibrium oligopoly and ownership structure. Econometrica, 89, 999–1048.

3. Bejan C. (2008). The objective of a privately owned firm under imperfect competition. Economic Theory 37, 99–118.

4. Blaug M. (2003). The formalist revolution of the 1950s. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25, 2, 145–156.

5. Bonnisseau J.-M., Florig M. (2005). Non-existence of duopoly equilibria: A simple numerical ex-ample. Journal of Economics, 85, 1, 65–75.

6. Cournot A. (1963). Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth. Home-wood (Illinois): Irwin. Originally published in 1838. Translated from the French “Recherchés sur les principles mathématiques de la théorie des richesses”, Paris.

7. Crez H., Tvede M. (2020). Corporate self-regulation of imperfect competition. Working paper. School of Economics of University of East Anglia, 1, 1–25.

8. Dierker E., Dierker H., Grodal B. (2000). Objectives of an imperfectly competitive firms: A sur-plus approach. Vienna Economics Paper 0007. University of Vienna, Department of Economics.

9. Gabszewich J.J., Vial J-P. (1972). Oligopoly ‘a la Cournot’ in a general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 381–400.

10. Gabszewicz J., Thisse J.-F. (2000). Microeconomic theories of imperfect competition. In: Cahiers d’Economie Politique, 37. Qu’a-t-on appris sur la concurrence imparfaite depuis Cournot?, 47–99.

11. Gabszewicz J.J. (2013). Introduction. In: ‘Recherchés économiques de Louvain’, 79, 4, 5–13.

12. Miller A.D. (2021). Voting in corporations. Theoretical Economics, 16, 101–128.

13. Móczár J. (2020). The Arrow-Debreu model of general equilibrium and Kornai’s critique in the light of neoclassical economics. Journal of Banking, Finance and Sustainable Development, 1, 42–68.

14. Negishi T. (1961). Monopolistic competition and general equilibrium. Rev. Econ. Studies, 28, 3, 196–201.

15. Vorob’ev N.N. (1970). The present state of the theory of games. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 25, 2, 77–136 (in Russian).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up