All
 
|
 
 


The role of communications in the development of a national innovation system
 
PIIS042473880010494-2-1
DOI10.31857/S042473880010494-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Andrey Fonotov 
Occupation: Professor, Head of Department
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Moscow, Russia
Journal nameEkonomika i matematicheskie metody
EditionVolume 56 Issue 3
Pages35-44
Abstract

In modern conditions, the concept of a quality resource, introduced by Yu.V. Yaremenko, is inextricably linked with high-quality communication, including not only communication channels, but also the rules of interaction between stakeholders. In the short term, one of the main tasks of the national innovation system (NIS) is to ensure high-quality communications between participants in the innovation process, which in developed economies is built around technological platforms (TP). It is shown that TPs are a key system-forming element of national and global innovation systems (GIS). The task of embedding in GIS is relevant for the Russian NIS. The UNCTAD report emphasizes that for NIS integrating into international R&D, new opportunities are opening up for the development of their own scientific, technical and innovative potentials. In the regulation and functioning of GIS, transnational corporations play a decisive role. The scale of modern innovation activity, covering all spheres of society, determines the cooperation of NIS within the GIS, as this is the best way to ensure the competitiveness of not only individual firms, but also national economies, as evidenced by the socio-economic progress of China. Currently, the Russian NIS is partly idle. R&D results do not find a way to business due to inefficient institutions, due to accumulated political and economic barriers and restrictions both at the institutional level – state regulation, intermediary systems (banks, ratings, patents, etc.), and political – bans on technology transfer, sanctions. All this in turn impedes the fruitful interaction between the NIS of Russia and the GIS. Based on the analysis, it is proposed to adjust the goals of the functioning of the Russian NIS by focusing it on work on promising domestic and integration with advanced foreign TPs. The solution to this problem is associated with the construction of effective communications between the NIS and GIS.

 

 

Keywordsnational innovation system, communication, technology platform, global innovation system
Received10.07.2020
Publication date04.09.2020
Number of characters32532
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 644

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Bobylev G., Gorbacheva N., Valieva O., Kravchenko N., Fedorov A., Fursenko N., Halimova S. (2019). Russia is in the mirror of international ratings. Novosibirsk: Parallel' (in Russian).
2. Castells M. (2004). Galaxy Internet: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Ekaterinburg: Faktoriya (in Russian).
3. Dezhina I. (2008). State regulation of science in Russia. Moscow: Magistr (in Russian).
4. Dynkin A., Ivanova N. (2019). Science and innovation in transitional economy. In: Transitional Economy: Aspects, Russian Problems. World Experience. Moscow: Ekonomika (in Russian).
5. Fligstin N. (2013). The architecture of markets. An economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: NRU HSE (in Russian).
6. Freeman C. (1995). The national innovation systems in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19 (1), 5–24.
7. Golichenko O. (2011). The main factors in the development of the national innovation system: lessons for Russia. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
8. Jaremenko Yu.V. (1981). Structural changes in the socialist economy. Moscow: Mysl (in Russian).
9. Kiselev I.P., Kitunin A.A. (2018). High-speed railway transport of China: from the first high-speed lines to the Eurasia megaproject. Transport of the Russian Federation, 1(74), 9–14. (in Russian).
10. Kondrat'ev V. (2011). Corporate innovation: A picture of the future. Direct Investments, 6, 54–58 (in Russian).
11. Kudrin A., Gurvich E. (2014). A new growth model for the Russian economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 4–36 (in Russian).
12. Kuznetsova G. (2015). The main trends in the global foreign direct investment market in 2014. The situation in Russia. National interests: Priorities and security, 42, 40–51 (in Russian).
13. Lundvall B. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive leaning. London: Printer Publishers. NSB (2016). National Science Board. Arlington: National Science Foundation. Science and Engineering Indicators, 4, 45–46.
14. Makarov V., Kleiner G. (2007). Microeconomics of knowledge. Moscow: Ekonomika (in Russian).
15. Mau V. (2004). Catching modernization in modern Russia. Journal of Management: Theory and Practice of, 4, 13–16 (in Russian).
16. McLuhan M. (2004). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Kiev: Nika-Tsentr (in Russian).
17. Philosophy of technology in Germany (1989). Compilation and introduction by Ts.G. Arzakanyan, V.G. Gorokhova. Moscow: Progress (in Russian).
18. Polterovich V. (2009). The problem of creating the national innovation system. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 45, 2, 3–18 (in Russian).
19. Radzhan G. (2013). Fault lines: How hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House (in Russian).
20. Sood A., Tellis G.J. (2005). Technological evolution and Radical innovation. Journal of marketing, 69 (July), Ñ. 152–168.
21. UNCTAD (2005). World Investment Report 2005. (Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R and D: Overview. Transnational Corporations (in Russian).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up